Giving Mayo the Loyala treatment

Devilzsidewalk · Post #1 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:43 am

when Loyala played Davidson, coach Patsos resorted to the very petty tactic of double teaming Stephen Curry everywhere just to keep him from scoring even though that left his team playing 3 on 4 every possession and they got blown out by 30

I propose McHale adopt the Loyala technique against OJ Mayo so he can say "see? I told you."

McHale - 1, Mayo Fanboys - 0

HL Slamdunk · Post #2 » by **HL Slamdunk** » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:34 pm

I don't know if teams are able to impose a Loyola v. Curry defense. There would be just too many other mismatches and wide-open shots for other players if we were to double team Mayo the whole time. It would definitely give McHale a sort of mental edge, but I don't think the Wolves, at this point in the season with the record they have, should be going for moral victories. This game is one that the Wolves can legitimately win, and they need to go for the win.

If Mayo gets really hot, then I could see constantly doubling him for a good period of time, but other than that, I think they should play their normal defense, but hopefully with some improved perimeter defense.

john2jer · Post #3 » by **john2jer** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 2:46 am

HL Slamdunk wrote:I don't know if teams are able to impose a Loyola v. Curry defense. There would be just too many other mismatches and wide-open shots for other players if we were to double team Mayo the whole time. It would definitely give McHale a sort of mental edge, but I don't think the Wolves, at this point in the season with the record they have, should be going for moral victories. This game is one that the Wolves can legitimately win, and they need to go for the win.

If Mayo gets really hot, then I could see constantly doubling him for a good period of time, but other than that, I think they should play their normal defense, but hopefully with some improved perimeter defense.

I think you missed the point. It's a great idea and we should go with it. In fact, they should have Love trap him in the far corner and not let him run up the floor. Then after the game we can scream how Love shut down Mayo. I LOVE IT!

HL Slamdunk · Post #4 » by **HL Slamdunk** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:02 am

john2jer wrote:
HL Slamdunk wrote:I don't know if teams are able to impose a Loyola v. Curry defense. There would be just too many other mismatches and wide-open shots for other players if we were to double team Mayo the whole time. It would definitely give McHale a sort of mental edge, but I don't think the Wolves, at this point in the season with the record they have, should be going for moral victories. This game is one that the Wolves can legitimately win, and they need to go for the win.

If Mayo gets really hot, then I could see constantly doubling him for a good period of time, but other than that, I think they should play their normal defense, but hopefully with some improved perimeter defense.

I think you missed the point. It's a great idea and we should go with it. In fact, they should have Love trap him in the far corner and not let him run up the floor. Then after the game we can scream how Love shut down Mayo. I LOVE IT!

Yeah that would be pretty sweet. I did get the point, but I just basically tried to state why the Wolves probably won't run it. I would run it if I were the coach. This would give us a one-up on Mayo.

theGreatRC · Post #5 » by **theGreatRC** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:29 pm

I hope Mayo goes off for 63 points and Love get his usual 2/10 game.

PeeDee · Post #6 » by **PeeDee** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:49 pm

mandurugo · Post #7 » by **mandurugo** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:07 pm

Speaking of Love, is Jim Peterson right about him hitting the "rookie wall" already? That was his explanation for his limited minutes that last few games. So he hit the wall after 20-25 games... if true, very discouraging since he wasn't playing extensive minutes to begin with. I blame Devilsidewalk for endlessly campaigning for this tub of goo and then never giving up on him.

HL Slamdunk · Post #8 » by **HL Slamdunk** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 3:46 pm

I wonder if part of the reason he hit the rookie wall so early was because his confidence was almost at nothing, which in my opinion is from poor coaching by Wittman. Wittman wouldn't give Love much of a chance because he has something against rookies, and then when Love would get one of his few chances, he would screw something up (missed shots, getting stuffed, missed free throws, dumb fouls, etc.). This just absolutely put love in a really deep hole.

Devilzsidewalk · Post #9 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:28 pm

mandurugo wrote:Speaking of Love, is Jim Peterson right about him hitting the "rookie wall" already? That was his explanation for his limited minutes that last few games. So he hit the wall after 20-25 games... if true, very discouraging since he wasn't playing extensive minutes to begin with. I blame Devilsidewalk for endlessly campaigning for this tub of goo and then never giving up on him.

he'll win your heart yet

SSUBluesman · Post #10 » by **SSUBluesman** » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:57 pm

I hope Mayo goes off for 63 points and Love get his usual 2/10 game.

That's only if Love can get more than his recent 8 mpg, allowing him to put up enough bricks and giving Mayo tons of easy looks inside (yea, I know Mayo doesn't go inside much, but it fits).

I'll be impressed if Love can actually accumulate more baskets than fouls.