Page 1 of 1

Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 4:55 am
by ChazzleDazzle
Not sure when we last talked about Kaman, but JA Adande on ESPN is making sounds that the Clips would much rather deal him than Camby, but that they'd want good return, not just expirings.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/stor ... dup-090218

Miller+McCants+Bos 1st
for
Kaman and Jason Hart?

Hell, with his foot problem, it might take throwing in Thornton to make it happen

Miller+Smith+Bos 1st+Utah 1st
for
Kaman and Thornton?

Just thinking out loud here...

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:04 am
by revprodeji
When you can get a dally or chandler for th exp, there is no reason to add value for Kaman.

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:08 am
by ChazzleDazzle
I totally agree on Chandler. Kaman's offensive upside makes him worth a bit more than Dally, to me.

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:08 am
by Krapinsky
I'm not a big fan of Thornton but from the Clippers persepctive he isn't exactly a throw in. Also, no interest in Kaman. As Rev alluded, Daly and Chandler are better fits.

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:19 am
by revprodeji
Better fits and better value.

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:36 am
by TheFranchise21
I don't want anything to do with Kaman's fragile body or his nasty contract.

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:44 am
by kandiking
Why would we need Kaman when we have Cardinal?

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 5:59 am
by revprodeji
TheFranchise21 wrote:I don't want anything to do with Kaman's fragile body or his nasty contract.


hehe...hehe...cavemen dont do it for you?

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:03 am
by southern wolf
When asked about the prospects that the Wolves will make a trade by the deadline, Kevin McHale told Jerry Zgoda, “Not great, probably not. But who knows.”


Let's hope that Stack isn't telling him something.

Re: Kaman

Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:21 am
by GopherIt!
I like the Caveman but he is not worth his contract.