ImageImageImage

Mike Miller by the numbers

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,817
And1: 1,104
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#1 » by cpfsf » Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:35 pm

Stats before the season ending injury to big Al
9 PPG 5.7 RPG 3.7 APG
.47 FG% .34 3P%

Stats after the injury (5 games)
13.8 PPG 6.6 RPG 5.8 APG
.54 FG% .43 3P%

Stats last year
16.4 PPG 6.7 RPG 3.4 APG
.5 FG% .43 3P%

My view is as long as Big Al is down, Miller is going to step up and have stats which are going to compare pretty well to his numbers last season and will certainly do what we expected of him before the Mayo-Love trade. It certainly won't hurt IF we want to deal him for someone else next year.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,253
And1: 14,635
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#2 » by shrink » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:08 pm

Interesting numbers .. thanks for putting that together cpfsf.

I think these people that rip on Miller miss the fact that he is an excellent all-around player, and expected a volume-three-point shooting stereoype.
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#3 » by casey » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:21 pm

I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games he's only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#4 » by john2jer » Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:29 pm

Are you discriminating against crack addicts?
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#5 » by 4ho5ive » Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:56 pm

Did I miss the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#6 » by casey » Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:57 pm

There's one at 6 too.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 48,470
And1: 14,332
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#7 » by Calinks » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:02 am

casey wrote:I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games he's only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.


Pretty much sums up my thoughts exactly.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#8 » by Devilzsidewalk » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:56 am

casey wrote:I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games hes only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.


=omg oden is so great

=another typical blazer nut hugger post from casey
Image
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 48,470
And1: 14,332
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#9 » by Calinks » Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:59 am

OMGWTF, Devilz=John Forbes Nash from A Beautiful Mind!
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,681
And1: 1,929
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#10 » by Krapinsky » Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:24 am

Devilzsidewalk wrote:
casey wrote:I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games hes only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.


=omg oden is so great

=another typical blazer nut hugger post from casey


Probably the funniest thing I've ever read
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#11 » by casey » Tue Feb 24, 2009 1:29 am

Devilzsidewalk wrote:
casey wrote:I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games hes only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.


=omg oden is so great

=another typical blazer nut hugger post from casey

Touché.

You 1, Me 0.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#12 » by Devilzsidewalk » Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:31 am

actually, I'm also the guy who cut you off on I 94 yesterday, then flipped you the bird while speeding away laughing

me 2, you 0

but come to think of it, I bet you're the one who took the last Vine tomato cluster at Rainbow yesterday when you know that I don't eat that Roma tomato garbage.

Me 2, you 1. I'm onto your psychological attacks bud
Image
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#13 » by 4ho5ive » Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:30 am

oh dear god...
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,322
And1: 24,142
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#14 » by GopherIt! » Tue Feb 24, 2009 10:49 am

Beautiful Mind??? I think Devilz may have just cracked the Da Vinci Code.


casey wrote:I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games he's only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.


six 6 six
poRtland
illuminati
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#15 » by john2jer » Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:34 pm

GopherIt! wrote:Beautiful Mind??? I think Devilz may have just cracked the Da Vinci Code.


casey wrote:I would hardly call it excellent, unless you're comparing it to the rest of this team. I expected a volume scorer, relatively speaking (as past years would suggest). Somewhere near the 18.5ppg he put up two years ago. Yet in 46 games he's only scored more than that twice. Twice. I expected more 20 points games out of him than Rodney Carney, Ryan Gomes, Kevin Love, Rashad McCants, Craig Smith, and Sebastian Telfair combined. Yet he doesn't have more than any one of those players individually. Anybody saying he sucks obviously isn't paying attention, because he's very valuable in some aspects. But anybody saying he's played up to expectations either had amazingly low expectations or has developed an addiction to crack.


six 6 six
poRtland
illuminati


This thread has put me in tears from laughter. Hilarious.

Still not sure what casey has against crack addicts, though.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#16 » by casey » Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:02 pm

I'm surprised it's taken you guys this long to figure out I type in code.


As far as crack goes. Yeah, right> Freak man, you really want me to defend that position?
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#17 » by casey » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 pm

casey wrote:As far as crack goes. Yeah, right> Freak man, you really want me to defend that position?

Really, nobody?
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
Frozen316
Pro Prospect
Posts: 806
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 07, 2006
Location: Here
Contact:

Re: Mike Miller by the numbers 

Post#18 » by Frozen316 » Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:21 pm

Drugs and alcohol are fail

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves