Page 1 of 3
A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:17 am
by Klomp
My thoughts are that we will look to trade for a vet SF this offseason. Who are some realistic possibilities?
ATL - Williams S&T
CHA - Wallace
CLE - James
DAL - Howard
DET - Prince
DEN - Anthony
MEM - Gay
NO - Posey
OKC - Green
WAS - Butler
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:30 am
by Basti
I think Posey would be the easiest one to get but I doubt he'll fit considering age and lack of talent (relatively)
I'm sure everyone could be had for the right price except for James obviously and to a lesser degree Anthony
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:34 am
by 4ho5ive
klomp44 wrote:My thoughts are that we will look to trade for a vet SF this offseason. Who are some realistic possibilities?
ATL - Williams S&T
CHA - Wallace
CLE - James
DAL - Howard
DET - Prince
DEN - Anthony
MEM - Gay
NO - Posey
OKC - Green
WAS - Butler

Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:36 am
by Klomp
I was trying to be sneaky. Obviously, it didn't work.
No one thinks we could get James for Miller and Cardinal?
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:46 am
by Basti
klomp44 wrote:I was trying to be sneaky. Obviously, it didn't work.
No one thinks we could get James for Miller and Cardinal?
that's overpaying for this scrub
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:49 am
by revprodeji
funny we make these threads at the same time Klomp. Surprised you did not mention Smith as a possibility.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 12:56 am
by Klomp
While a tweener, I consider him a PF more than SF.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:03 am
by Basti
from what I've seen and read Josh Smith is a PF suited in a SF body so I'm not sure if he'd fit well here.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:07 am
by B Calrissian
the_incredible_basti wrote:from what I've seen and read Josh Smith is a PF suited in a SF body so I'm not sure if he'd fit well here.
He could act as the third big man in the rotation and play the rest of his minutes at sf. I think he is a good fit.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:11 am
by revprodeji
He is a SF, he only plays PF because of who is on atlanta's roster.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:13 am
by Klomp
What would it take to get him? I think I'd even include Foye in a deal, but not sure its necessary.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:23 am
by revprodeji
I think he can be an AK-type SF. I think he only plays PF for atlanta because of the other SF's.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:24 am
by Basti
klomp44 wrote:What would it take to get him? I think I'd even include Foye in a deal, but not sure its necessary.
Foye should be considered as a filler in a deal involving Josh Smith
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:27 am
by Klomp
the_incredible_basti wrote:klomp44 wrote:What would it take to get him? I think I'd even include Foye in a deal, but not sure its necessary.
Foye should be considered as a filler in a deal involving Josh Smith
OK, I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks that. I thought I was overvaluing him for a sec.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 1:32 am
by Basti
yes even if he still has upside (IMO he has) but let's face it: he's kind of injury prone and while he still might become a decent player he's already a few years older than Josh Smith (he's ~22 isn't he?)
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 3:20 am
by Devilzsidewalk
what about s&t MM for Odom, I know he's not the ideal SF, but he has the footspeed to handle it, plus it'd be easier to have Foye on the court w/ Odom as an extra playmaker and he'd give us an unparalleled rebounding advantage. Plus he could act as a quasi 3rd bigman off the bench too.
And for Odom he'd be getting a better contract than anywhere else plus we could play him 40 minutes a game between starting SF and giving Love and Jefferson breathers at PF.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 3:26 am
by 4ho5ive
Odom looks good now because he is on a team that is constantly winning. I have seen Odom's work on ~.500 teams and it isnt pretty.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 3:31 am
by revprodeji
Most people tend to think Odom has lost a step and is more of a 4 now then a 3.
You cite Odom for an extra ballhandler and rebounder. Isnt that what Miller brings?
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 3:46 am
by Devilzsidewalk
I dunno, just a thought; figure he could be had for about 4 years 30 mil and that seems a good deal for Odom. He could play some SF and some PF or even Center in an alternate smaller lineup that would give us a running dimension we sorely lack right now.
Re: A Vet SF?
Posted: Mon Apr 6, 2009 3:10 pm
by john2jer
I'd trade Mike Miller and add in Rev as filler to get Josh Smith. I'd add in the Miami pick as well. They have any bad contracts we could take on?
C - Love/Jordan
PF - Smith/Smith
SF - Gomes/Carney
SG - Foye/Brewer
PG - Evans/Telfair
Until Jefferson comes back, then slide Josh Smith down to SF and insert Jefferson in as the PF. J-Smooth could definitely play the AK47 roll. Smith can't hit the outisde shot, but he could definitely play help defense and block shots for us. He's also another go to scorer.