Page 1 of 1
MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:08 am
by Klomp
Craig Smith for Jordan Farmar
Why for Us?
This trade does two things for us. First, it gets rid of an undersized PF, since we have a couple too many. Second, it upgrades our PG talent and our depth. Farmar instantly becomes our starting point guard.
Why for Them?
Farmar has been a benchwarmer lately with the good play of Shannon Brown. One of the Lakers' biggest flaws is that they have no interior toughness, and that they are a finesse team. Smith instantly brings toughness to the backup PF position.
Thoughts?
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:16 am
by theGreatRC
Seems fair for both teams, although I can see why LAL might not think so.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:18 am
by Krapinsky
Farmar isn't much of an improvement over Brown and Telfair so I say no.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:36 am
by shrink
I'd be OK with that. I'd prefer this to be a draft night trade, to make sure we haven't addressed our PG needs in the draft. I think Farmar has potential, so maybe a move would help him.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:36 am
by Klomp
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:Farmar isn't much of an improvement over Brown and Telfair so I say no.
Wow really? Last year, he averaged 9 pts 3 ast in 20 mins. This yr, Telfair averaged 10/4 in 28 minutes. So Telfair needed an additional 8 mins to avg one more pt and ast.
Farmar would automatically be our starter. He has good size (6'2"), plays solid defense, and can do
THIS and
THIS
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:37 am
by theGreatRC
If we can get Hinrich and Farmar, i'm loving our PG depth.
Hinrich/Farmar/Telfair
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:27 am
by southern wolf
I couldn't bring myself to do it. I love the way Cookie plays, and he's incredibly efficient when he's on the court. But if we manage to snatch Griffin, it would work out perfectly.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:01 pm
by Krapinsky
I've watched him all year and he's been very disappointing.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:54 pm
by revprodeji
yea, Farmer does nothing for me.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:55 pm
by collin_k41
I agree with shrink that this would be a good draft night trade if we don't get a PG. I'm pretty sure we will, especially at #18, but you never know. I'd rather have Hinrich as a player but not as a contract.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 4:46 pm
by the_bruce
Laker fan was fishing on the trade board for the #29 + Farmer. I think with a signed #29 + farmer for cookie they save ~.5m with lux added and get a more productive player. If you coupled this with shrinks hinirch cap trade with telefair subbed in I think thats a very solid lineup for next year.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:22 pm
by Esohny
While he's not what I'd want in a long-term starter, I'd much rather have Farmar playing major minutes than Telfair. They're both below average scorers, but I like Farmar's size and defense and I don't see his distribution as being that much worse than Telfair.
Re: MIN/LAL
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:30 pm
by Devilzsidewalk
bruceallen61 wrote:Laker fan was fishing on the trade board for the #29 + Farmer. I think with a signed #29 + farmer for cookie they save ~.5m with lux added and get a more productive player. If you coupled this with shrinks hinirch cap trade with telefair subbed in I think thats a very solid lineup for next year.
they were probably thinking they'd get a top 10 pick since Farmar is a great prospect and the #29 is just as good as a mid lotto anyways since this draft is the weakest of any draft in NBA history ever ever and all the players outside of the top 2 are going to be 5th round draft picks in the NBDL and the rest will be beaten to death for wasting our time typing up scouting reports on their sorriness