Page 1 of 2
MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:38 pm
by ritt0093
MIN gives/MEM receives:
K. Love, 6th pick (DeRozan)
MEM gives/MIN receives:
R. Gay, 2nd Pick (Rubio)
MEM
PG:Conley
SG:Mayo
SF:DeRozan
PF:Love
C:Gasol
MIN
PG:Rubio
SG:Foye
SF:Gay
PF:Jefferson
C:??? Mullens?
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:41 pm
by PeeDee
LOL @ our bigs after this trade.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:41 pm
by moss_is_1
Lmao why would Memphis trade the better player and the higher pick?
I know that Gay and Mayo don't fit well together but there's better deals than that out there, I love Kevin and I want Rubio just as bad as anyone but this trade is a little one sided, although I think that it makes sense for Memphis and they'd be headed in the right direction.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:44 pm
by Esohny
John Forbes Nash might approve of that trade, but I doubt Memphis does.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:48 pm
by revprodeji
Love>Gay
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:51 pm
by john2jer
I don't think the value is that far off. If Love was in this draft he'd be in the discussion for the #2 pick, and I could see Memphis potentially taking him due to fit.
So it becomes #6 vs Gay? We'd probably have to add in a hair more, like the #18 possibly.
Even still, I don't do it. We need guys with some emotion, some passion, some spunk! Love has spunk! Gay is anti-spunk. Wait... Nevermind...
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:52 pm
by funkatron101
The only trade involving those two should be one that brings Gay-Love together.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:53 pm
by 4ho5ive
I agree. Love is better than Gay, but this isnt enough value IMO. They are better off trying for Thompson/#4.
Seems like the odds are always going to be against Gay-Love
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 5:56 pm
by funkatron101
4ho5ive wrote:Seems like the odds are always going to be against Gay-Love
Love has a prop 8 contract clause.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:23 pm
by karch34
I think we'd probably have to give a little more up, but I actually think it's pretty close to fair value. I'll give you that Love is better than Gay, but is it enough to move up from 6 to 2? Probably not, but it's close, IMO.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:37 pm
by shrink
This is a trade I've seen suggested before from non-MIN/MEM posters, which generally suggests some legitimacy to the swap.
#6 < #2, but Love's value > Gay's value, since Gay's older and needs to get paid next year, and Love's locked into the rookie contract.
I'd give that a long look.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:38 pm
by C.lupus
So throw in Smith as a backup PF and call it a day.
I gotta admit, that is a nice looking core for Memphis. Value matching or not, I think I like that MEM team a lot better than the Minny lineup.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 6:47 pm
by mayorhoiberg
If we were going to pair Rubio and Gay, I'd want Love around to start the fast breaks with some beautiful outlet passes. Give them the big Black Hole instead.

Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 7:01 pm
by john2jer
We already traded McCants to the Kings.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 8:14 pm
by T-WolvesGuy
I would love for them to bring in a star, but i agree with mayor I think that K love fits beter with Gay.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Wed May 27, 2009 9:07 pm
by Foye
Grizz won't do that unless we get some bad contracts in return for some expirings as well...
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 5:50 am
by southern wolf
Unless we were clearly getting the better deal I wouldn't trade Love. The unknown of Rubio, and Gay to an extent, puts me off.
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:17 am
by big3_8_19_21
so...Miller/Love/6 for Gay/2/Jaric/Buckner?
Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 8:21 am
by Foye
That is probably closer.

Re: MN-MEM
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 3:39 pm
by funkatron101
big3_8_19_21 wrote:so...Miller/Love/6 for Gay/2/Jaric/Buckner?
That's not going to happen
