ImageImageImage

The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#1 » by the_bruce » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:37 pm

It's anyones guess who actually falls to 5 & 6, but lets open up the discussion on this for a bit shall we?

After this trade I think MN is actually the least ideal situation for Rubio. We lack shooters for him to create for and while he may excel in the 2 man game with love or al his wing pairings won't have the lights out shooting, nor do we have anyone who will thrive on basketcuts or alley oops. Rubio can't really create for himself, has no pullup. I think he is more than 17 months away from contributing to his potential. Who's the ideal pairing with him on the wing with the other pick? Is it harden? It certainly isn't evans as he's to ball dominant. Curry is a pg at the next level so it certainly isn't him. I think Williams @ the 2 would work well with Rubio, but is somewhat out of our range. Probably budinger too, but again he will probably be gone before 28. Derozan probably.

Evans and harden are the same guy to me, different types of games but similar in size, I give the edge to evans based on his take it to ya mentality. While I like Harden's more cerebral approach to the game. I switch hourly on these 2. They pair fairly well with anyone imo.

Curry can certainly work well with al/love, and he replaces Foye's shooting ability. Can he be an nba point though is the concern. He's certainly quick enough. My problem here is I have teague > curry and I think we can nab teague later with the 18(or slightly with a move up). So why waste the 6 on him?

I think the most bang for the buck is...

Teague (all around solid offensive game)
harden/Evans or Rubio (rubio being the ideal floor mate with teague/rozan, other 2 being bpa )
Derozan (mid range game, basket cuts, transition)
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#2 » by Basti » Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:39 pm

bruceallen61 wrote:After this trade I think Rubio is actually the least ideal situation for Rubio.


you're right, Thabeet is the best situation for Rubio. Rubio is not good for Rubio.
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#3 » by prefuse73 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:01 pm

I am assuming the it will go like this:

LAC - Griffin
Mem - Rubio (will take him and wait for a deal)
OKC - Harden (I hope they take Thabeet, but Harden fits perfectly)
SAC - Curry (May go with Evans, but I think Curry fits better with martin)

For me this would be the worst possible draft situation. If a deal with Memphis doesn't happen (say no to any Love deals) we are left to choose between Thabeet, Evans, Flynn and perhaps Derozan (hopefully he can get in for workout). Thabeet might be taken for value and then traded, but I would be okay with a Flynn - Evans backcourt.

Ideally however, I would want in this order...

Rubio/Harden
Curry/Harden
Curry/Evans
Rubio / Evans
Flynn / Harden
Flynn / Evans
slinky
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,332
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 13, 2006

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#4 » by slinky » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:21 pm

Did I miss something recently about Holiday?

Unless I have missed some breaking news, I would want Holiday before Curry or Flynn.

My vote is for a Holiday/Evans back court. Holiday/Harden works as well.

Derozan should not be sniffed in the first 6 picks. I would easily trade up into the 10-15 range for him though.
User avatar
Vega06
Analyst
Posts: 3,743
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Queens, New York

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#5 » by Vega06 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:33 pm

I'm liking Flynn/Evans - Curry/Evans - or if Harden falls pairing him up with Holiday would be nice.
User avatar
Sephiroth
Senior
Posts: 736
And1: 108
Joined: Feb 04, 2006

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#6 » by Sephiroth » Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:59 pm

I am hoping to see a Harden & Thabeet draft by the Wolves.

I know I'm one of the few that actually likes Thabeet - reasons being that he's a proven true center that the Wolves lack and are in need of.

Harden would fill the void left by Foye/Miller.

Thabeet, Jefferson, Love, and Harden would be the core that I would want to build around - everyone else (Brewer, Gomes, Telfair) can be packaged for a veteran PG or move up to grab one.

For the 18th pick we would need a PG (any of Lawson or Teague). If we need to trade up to grab either of those guys (Gomes + 18) would be fine by me. Or else we would roll with Telfair for another season - which isn't too bad.

DraftExpress has us taking Rubio with #5 and Evans with #6 - which would be awesome.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#7 » by PeeDee » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:02 pm

That would not be awesome. Our backcourt prolly wouldn't make a 3 pointer till January.
User avatar
Chi Dynasty12
Analyst
Posts: 3,208
And1: 143
Joined: Jul 12, 2006

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#8 » by Chi Dynasty12 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:03 pm

Found a nice write up here on your guys' options: http://draftparty.net/mailbag-nba-temp.html

I like the Tyreke-Curry or Flynn-Harden
Caleb / BJ 2025
User avatar
Vega06
Analyst
Posts: 3,743
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Queens, New York

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#9 » by Vega06 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:12 pm

Sephiroth wrote:I am hoping to see a Harden & Thabeet draft by the Wolves.

I know I'm one of the few that actually likes Thabeet - reasons being that he's a proven true center that the Wolves lack and are in need of.

Harden would fill the void left by Foye/Miller.

Thabeet, Jefferson, Love, and Harden would be the core that I would want to build around - everyone else (Brewer, Gomes, Telfair) can be packaged for a veteran PG or move up to grab one.

For the 18th pick we would need a PG (any of Lawson or Teague). If we need to trade up to grab either of those guys (Gomes + 18) would be fine by me. Or else we would roll with Telfair for another season - which isn't too bad.

DraftExpress has us taking Rubio with #5 and Evans with #6 - which would be awesome.



Man, a Thabeet, Harden, Lawson draft would be sweet. I'm convinced Harden will be taken by OKC though. That's a dream draft.
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#10 » by wolves_fan_82au » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:20 pm

Harden/Curry or evans or Holiday depending who drops

rubio will be good but unless the 6,28 gets it done than its pointless
i would rather we keep the picks and went with this
sg-Harden/Teague/Ellington
pg-Holiday/Mills

i really want both holiday and teague on this side but doubt we would get both,is teague capable of playing the 2 in the nba?
and basically if we went with rubio and didntpick up a sg we would be screwed bad ,a brewer/rubio backcourt would make us a useless scoring team
teams supporting
NBA-Minnesota t-wolves
NHL-Toronto Mapleleafs
NFL-Miami Dolphins
MLB-???
Others:Wests Tigers,Leeds United,Schalke,VVV,Sydney Kings,Tatsuma Ito
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,018
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#11 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:38 pm

AWESOME, OKC is gonna get Rip Hamilton, I think they might go Thabeet
Image
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,018
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#12 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:38 pm

oh wait, unconfirmed rumor as of now :(
Image
smithmn
Ballboy
Posts: 5
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#13 » by smithmn » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:49 pm

If we make no trades, ideal for me is like this, in order...

Curry/Evans
Curry/Harden
Flynn/Evans
Flynn/Harden

But, I would be the most happy with...

Rubio/Evans
Rubio/Harden
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#14 » by Dewey » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:10 pm

The Rubio debate is growing and growing ... here's a different angle.

We all know Rubio is not a sniper ... he is a passer 1st PG, decent shooter from the 3pt line, and been named the top defender of the year twice. Scouts feel he will develop phyically and will experience a rapid improvement in shooting as his strength improves the next 1-2 years.

We all know Evans has kind of an ugly shot ... he is a slasher/driver Combo-Guard, okay j-shot, and can defend at least 2 and maybe 3 positions.

Harden is a nimble player with few weaknesses and could be considered the "Safe Pick" ... shoots well, decent rebounder and defender. Lack speed for SG in the NBA? Big enough for a SF in NBA?

Curry is a cold-blooded shooter ... buthis defense is suspect. Unlike Rubio, his build does have natural defensive skills and appears more susceptable to the rogorus NBA. Has some PG skills, but is assumed an offensive player/shooter.

Others have said it best. The draft is 90% potential ... If Rubio is a poor j-shooter with other high-level skills ... it's assumed he will develop and become a much better shooter. Same for Evans. Harden SG/SF and Curry PG/SG may be more complete, but may have more phyical limitations for their position. For example: They have more scoring skills, but will they have the physical ability to use them at their NBA positions. I think so, but some don't.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#15 » by karch34 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:24 pm

Curry-Evans and Flynn-Harden are probably a tie for me. I wouldn't be upset with Evans-Harden or Flynn-Evans either. With Evans-Harden, I would definitely look at Maynor at #18.

I think 1-3 is Griffin, Rubio, Thabeet and then who knows with Sacto. Memphis and OKC aren't definites, but I think highly likely. Memphis might think they can sign Rubio or wait for the offers. OKC is hard to call, but I still think they like Thabo and trying to deal for Chandler makes me think Thabeet is the fit.
slambamJazz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,504
And1: 0
Joined: May 21, 2001

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#16 » by slambamJazz » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:38 pm

If Hardin drops to 5 pick then draft him. Then Trade 6 pick to Boston for Rondo.I think would be a great back court for Minnesota. I would only trade for Rondo if Hardin drops to 5 spot.
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#17 » by B Calrissian » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:41 pm

If the Wolves don't get Rubio I would trade either 5 or 6 for Rondo no matter who drops.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#18 » by PeeDee » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:44 pm

Rondo would be dreamy.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#19 » by Krapinsky » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:01 pm

Rondo is no good. Great player, but has an attitude, and is about to get paid big time. Do you really want to pay him $12-15 million a year next year? And trade the #6 pick in order to do so?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: The Ideal pairing thread for 5 & 6 

Post#20 » by PeeDee » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:04 pm

You're right. But he's still dreamy.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves