RealGM

I'd take that in a heartbeat.

You get Evans at 6, then Jennings or Flynn at #8, not to mention a natural wing who averaged 14 and 6 last year.

If the Knicks offer that, I'd have to say we'd take that.

Nope - at least not yet. We don't know who's dropping to #5, and I'm not sure wilson Chandler would be such a great acquisition for our team anyway.

No need to do it yet because we don't know who's there, but if we're thinking Flynn is our PG we'd targert at 5/6 makes sense to pick him up at #8 and get an asset like Chandler. Flynn, Evans/Harden, and Chandler gives us a nice 1-3 to build on.

I would love if we took Jennings at 8 with Evans at 6.

Depending on what happens with the first 4 picks of course, but Chandler is a natural wing which we are lacking.

If Rubio, Harden, and Thabeet are all gone, then maybe. Otherwise no way.

Yuck.

Not a big fan. His shooting % are not great, and his numbers are inflated a little due D'Antoni's offense. Assuming the guy we want at 6 is there at 8 though, might as well. He's not much of an improvement over Gomes or Brewer, if any, so it's kind of a whatever type of deal.

Numbers are inflated. I doubt we trade down. if we make a move it will be to trade up or a package for an existing player.

No. Chandler not much better than Gomes IMO

Ugh, I think we could have gotten Flynn at 8, + an additional wing, which we needed.

possibly. Personally I don't think there's any possible way NY would take Hill over Flynn.

New York would have taken Curry. I don't think Golden State would have taken Flynn

NY would've taken Rubio at 5

We odviously did not like any SG's at 8 or lower. Evans might have been the only SG(PG/SG) we liked.