ImageImageImage

Daniels?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Daniels? 

Post#1 » by Vindicater » Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:33 am

Marquis Daniels is now a free agent.

Is he worth a look to help fill our shooting guard spot? He is still quite young and could be a nice veteran to grow with the kiddies. Id be willing to chuck $2-3 million a year at him.

What you guys think?
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
jcldallas24
Starter
Posts: 2,427
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Daniels? 

Post#2 » by jcldallas24 » Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:44 am

Sorry he's coming to Dallas book it.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Daniels? 

Post#3 » by Krapinsky » Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:37 pm

Good player, but not a shooter, so not a great fit.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Daniels? 

Post#4 » by revprodeji » Sat Jun 27, 2009 6:03 pm

I thought he was kind of a headcase?

We need to get past the Mchale patching holes idea.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Daniels? 

Post#5 » by Vindicater » Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:39 am

Rev

From all reports his headcase days have passed, Indiana Fans seem to think he was a posative influence, the only reason they didnt pick up his optin was the (Please Use More Appropriate Word) amount of money it would have cost (seven odd million).

I dont think he is a patch for a hole, 2-3 million is about right for a mid-age roleplayer
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
User avatar
KG_Wolves
Starter
Posts: 2,249
And1: 532
Joined: Apr 14, 2009
   

Re: Daniels? 

Post#6 » by KG_Wolves » Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:08 am

I would rather roll w/ Ellington and Brewer than this retread.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Daniels? 

Post#7 » by Vindicater » Wed Jul 1, 2009 11:15 am

KG_Wolves wrote:I would rather roll w/ Ellington and Brewer than this retread.


So we rolling with them for 48 mins? A rookie and a 3rd year player who didnt play his second season at all and could take quite alot of time to come back from a horrible injury.

Yep... that makes me happy, IM not saying Daniels is a player that will come in and be the missing peice. I just think he could be a good option as a low-cost vet who can help.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Daniels? 

Post#8 » by MN Die Hard » Wed Jul 1, 2009 12:06 pm

I love it when guys say "book it". Ok, consider it booked!

My first reaction is that he was a headcase too, but maybe it's true that he's straightened out. Either way I dont think it's a perfect fit. He's not a bad player, but I think he tends to be injured a lot, and his outside shooting isnt great. And he's 28, not old by any means but not right in line with our young core either.

He's the type of player I would have liked to have in the KG years rather than during the rebuilding years.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: Daniels? 

Post#9 » by PeeDee » Wed Jul 1, 2009 12:10 pm

I'd rather get the Carnosaur back.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,286
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Daniels? 

Post#10 » by shrink » Wed Jul 1, 2009 12:16 pm

I have no problem with Marquis Daniels is its a 1-year deal. Last year was his best season ever.

28 years old, 6-6, 200 lb.
31.5 MPG, FG 45.1%, FT 72.1% 3P 20.0%, 4.6 RPG, 2.1 APG, 13.6 PPG

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/marquis_d ... index.html


I should also clarify something. I often say that our season starts in 2010, and I don't care if we do moves that hurt us in 2009 if it helps longterm. Well, that's only partly true. We still want to be able to put a team on the floor this year that at least has a chance to compete. We don't want to disillusion the young players completely, and selling tickets and reclaiming fans would still be a good thing for Taylor. However, I would work hard to make minor moves that do nothing to reduce our 2010 effectiveness. A one-year deal to Marquis Daniels would fit that criteria for me.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,055
And1: 3,612
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Daniels? 

Post#11 » by Foye » Wed Jul 1, 2009 12:52 pm

I like him but he does not fit and is just another role player, we don't really need him.
Biff Cooper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,732
And1: 317
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Northern Minnesota
 

Re: Daniels? 

Post#12 » by Biff Cooper » Wed Jul 1, 2009 2:18 pm

shrink wrote:I have no problem with Marquis Daniels is its a 1-year deal. Last year was his best season ever.

28 years old, 6-6, 200 lb.
31.5 MPG, FG 45.1%, FT 72.1% 3P 20.0%, 4.6 RPG, 2.1 APG, 13.6 PPG

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/marquis_d ... index.html


I should also clarify something. I often say that our season starts in 2010, and I don't care if we do moves that hurt us in 2009 if it helps longterm. Well, that's only partly true. We still want to be able to put a team on the floor this year that at least has a chance to compete. We don't want to disillusion the young players completely, and selling tickets and reclaiming fans would still be a good thing for Taylor. However, I would work hard to make minor moves that do nothing to reduce our 2010 effectiveness. A one-year deal to Marquis Daniels would fit that criteria for me.


Well put!!
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: Daniels? 

Post#13 » by prefuse73 » Wed Jul 1, 2009 3:56 pm

I think that you can "book it" that we are not signing any free agents this offseason unless they are vet min types. I think we are going to just even out a roster a bit with all our PF's and PG's, while keeping the same (or better) cap flexibility we currently have.

I could see a S&T for Marvin Williams... maybe...
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Daniels? 

Post#14 » by Vindicater » Thu Jul 2, 2009 1:45 am

I dont see us going after Marvin WIlliams anymore, although he now fits even better into our system with Flynn and Rubio at the guard spots.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves