Q Rich for Blount
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Q Rich for Blount
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 184
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jun 08, 2008
- Location: Backwoods by my TV
-
Q Rich for Blount
Posted on August 13th, 2009 – 10:01 PM
By Jerry Zgoda
First, Etan Thomas.
Now, Quentin Richardson.
Soon, Mark Blount.
For the second time this summer, David Kahn dealt away a player before he ever really arrived in Minnesota. This time, the Wolves dealt Richardson — acquired from the L.A. Clippers last month in that 3-for-1 deal that sent Craig Smith, Sebastian Telfair and Mark Madsen westward — late Thursday night to Miami and brought back veteran center Mark Blount (of all people).
This deal, too, is all about cost saving and salary-cap stuff.
Both players have expiring salaries, but the Wolves will save nearly $1.4 million by waiving Blount and his $7.96 million contract rather than dump Richardson’s $9.35 million contract.
By making this deal, it’s clear Kahn never intended having Richardson, who likely would have been a runaway gunner in his contract year, on this season’s team.
Kahn still could deal Blount’s contract in another deal, but it seems like waiving him outright is more likely.
Either way, he’ll be back with the Wolves on paper only — and probably fairly briefly — nearly two years after the Wolves’ old regime miraculously traded Ricky Davis and Blount to the Heat for Antoine Walker and that 2009 first-round pick that Kahn in essence dealt to Denver for a future first-round pick.
By Jerry Zgoda
First, Etan Thomas.
Now, Quentin Richardson.
Soon, Mark Blount.
For the second time this summer, David Kahn dealt away a player before he ever really arrived in Minnesota. This time, the Wolves dealt Richardson — acquired from the L.A. Clippers last month in that 3-for-1 deal that sent Craig Smith, Sebastian Telfair and Mark Madsen westward — late Thursday night to Miami and brought back veteran center Mark Blount (of all people).
This deal, too, is all about cost saving and salary-cap stuff.
Both players have expiring salaries, but the Wolves will save nearly $1.4 million by waiving Blount and his $7.96 million contract rather than dump Richardson’s $9.35 million contract.
By making this deal, it’s clear Kahn never intended having Richardson, who likely would have been a runaway gunner in his contract year, on this season’s team.
Kahn still could deal Blount’s contract in another deal, but it seems like waiving him outright is more likely.
Either way, he’ll be back with the Wolves on paper only — and probably fairly briefly — nearly two years after the Wolves’ old regime miraculously traded Ricky Davis and Blount to the Heat for Antoine Walker and that 2009 first-round pick that Kahn in essence dealt to Denver for a future first-round pick.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,727
- And1: 22,293
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
Wow
Too bad no picks involved
Too bad no picks involved
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: Q Rich for Blount
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: Q Rich for Blount
hypothetically, this could also help in getting rid of Songaila as it creates a TPE for shrink to play with...do we have any other TPE's that we could deal as well?
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,727
- And1: 22,293
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
big3_8_19_21 wrote:hypothetically, this could also help in getting rid of Songaila as it creates a TPE for shrink to play with...do we have any other TPE's that we could deal as well?
Wrong. Can't combine players and TPEs.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,727
- And1: 22,293
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
I guess I was hoping for more, but this is fine too. The only thing Q wouldve done was take PT from the young pups and maybe help us win a couple more games. Not a big deal, so I'll choose the savings.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,165
- And1: 2
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
- Location: Southern California
Re: Q Rich for Blount
thanks minny.
did yall like blount's stint the first time around? just wondering.
did yall like blount's stint the first time around? just wondering.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,599
- And1: 24,742
- Joined: Oct 20, 2007
- Location: bird watching
- Contact:
Re: Q Rich for Blount
This makes the Maddog trade look bad. We gave up our best cheerleader for nothing.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- TheFranchise21
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,518
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 14, 2001
- Location: All Day
- Contact:
Re: Q Rich for Blount
We save $1.4 million so it's not a complete waste. Obviously that $1.4 million only benefits Glen Taylor's checkbook, but it's not like Richardson was going to contribute anything for us.
My Kobe Bryant website I designed myself: http://personal.stthomas.edu/dnnguyen/kb24.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
I know. Kinda anticlimactic. Well, there's still Chuck's contract to play with in trades.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,895
- And1: 1,069
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: Q Rich for Blount
Not bad I guess....
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- jade_hippo
- Starter
- Posts: 2,383
- And1: 135
- Joined: Jan 05, 2009
- Location: Take off... eh!
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
I didn't mind him the first time around. He fit well with KG. Not sure he has a place on this team. I hope he is just waved or immediately swung for something else.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- Dalvin
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,339
- And1: 1,090
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
Not bad, it's a shame there were no picks involved. Is Kahn done dealing? Or is this another precursor to another trade?
shrink wrote:Good point, and welcome to the boards.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- FairDinkum
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,353
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 19, 2005
- Location: Geelong/Melbourne, AUS
Re: Q Rich for Blount
I am just stoked that Q got traded again
hahahahahahaha Kahn did a funny
hahahahahahaha Kahn did a funny
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
Let's pray that Kahn can move Songaila's contract.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- revprodeji
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 22,388
- And1: 8
- Joined: Dec 25, 2002
- Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
- Contact:
Re: Q Rich for Blount
Remember that hypothetical 3-way with Denver's TPE and a gay-like player? I was told that Qrich was not compatible for the Denver TPE but Blount is. Not saying to expect anything, but it would make the trade make sense.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Re: Q Rich for Blount
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
revprodeji wrote:Remember that hypothetical 3-way with Denver's TPE and a gay-like player? I was told that Qrich was not compatible for the Denver TPE but Blount is. Not saying to expect anything, but it would make the trade make sense.
Intriguing.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: Q Rich for Blount
why would denver trade their TPE for Blount? they just used future first to dump Hunter.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,059
- And1: 2
- Joined: Oct 01, 2008
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: Q Rich for Blount
craig smith, sebastian telfair(who IMO couldve easily been traded to ORL with a second and cash), and mark madsen for Mark Blount and a little savings... i dunno.
Re: Q Rich for Blount
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Q Rich for Blount
YES my boy! The prodigal son returns!
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves