Page 1 of 4

Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:05 am
by GeorgiaWolf
Posted on August 13th, 2009 – 10:01 PM
By Jerry Zgoda

First, Etan Thomas.

Now, Quentin Richardson.

Soon, Mark Blount.

For the second time this summer, David Kahn dealt away a player before he ever really arrived in Minnesota. This time, the Wolves dealt Richardson — acquired from the L.A. Clippers last month in that 3-for-1 deal that sent Craig Smith, Sebastian Telfair and Mark Madsen westward — late Thursday night to Miami and brought back veteran center Mark Blount (of all people).

This deal, too, is all about cost saving and salary-cap stuff.

Both players have expiring salaries, but the Wolves will save nearly $1.4 million by waiving Blount and his $7.96 million contract rather than dump Richardson’s $9.35 million contract.

By making this deal, it’s clear Kahn never intended having Richardson, who likely would have been a runaway gunner in his contract year, on this season’s team.

Kahn still could deal Blount’s contract in another deal, but it seems like waiving him outright is more likely.

Either way, he’ll be back with the Wolves on paper only — and probably fairly briefly — nearly two years after the Wolves’ old regime miraculously traded Ricky Davis and Blount to the Heat for Antoine Walker and that 2009 first-round pick that Kahn in essence dealt to Denver for a future first-round pick.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:08 am
by Klomp
Wow

Too bad no picks involved

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:11 am
by big3_8_19_21

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:15 am
by big3_8_19_21
hypothetically, this could also help in getting rid of Songaila as it creates a TPE for shrink to play with...do we have any other TPE's that we could deal as well?

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:19 am
by Klomp
big3_8_19_21 wrote:hypothetically, this could also help in getting rid of Songaila as it creates a TPE for shrink to play with...do we have any other TPE's that we could deal as well?


Wrong. Can't combine players and TPEs.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:22 am
by Klomp
I guess I was hoping for more, but this is fine too. The only thing Q wouldve done was take PT from the young pups and maybe help us win a couple more games. Not a big deal, so I'll choose the savings.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:26 am
by Mr Excitement
thanks minny.


did yall like blount's stint the first time around? just wondering.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:26 am
by GopherIt!
This makes the Maddog trade look bad. We gave up our best cheerleader for nothing.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:30 am
by TheFranchise21
We save $1.4 million so it's not a complete waste. Obviously that $1.4 million only benefits Glen Taylor's checkbook, but it's not like Richardson was going to contribute anything for us.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:32 am
by Esohny
I know. Kinda anticlimactic. Well, there's still Chuck's contract to play with in trades.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:33 am
by Dewey
Not bad I guess....

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:44 am
by jade_hippo
I didn't mind him the first time around. He fit well with KG. Not sure he has a place on this team. I hope he is just waved or immediately swung for something else.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:48 am
by Dalvin
Not bad, it's a shame there were no picks involved. Is Kahn done dealing? Or is this another precursor to another trade?

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:50 am
by FairDinkum
I am just stoked that Q got traded again

hahahahahahaha Kahn did a funny

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:51 am
by Esohny
Let's pray that Kahn can move Songaila's contract.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:52 am
by revprodeji
Remember that hypothetical 3-way with Denver's TPE and a gay-like player? I was told that Qrich was not compatible for the Denver TPE but Blount is. Not saying to expect anything, but it would make the trade make sense.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:53 am
by Esohny
revprodeji wrote:Remember that hypothetical 3-way with Denver's TPE and a gay-like player? I was told that Qrich was not compatible for the Denver TPE but Blount is. Not saying to expect anything, but it would make the trade make sense.


Intriguing.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:56 am
by NewWolvesOrder
why would denver trade their TPE for Blount? they just used future first to dump Hunter.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:02 am
by I am Ra
craig smith, sebastian telfair(who IMO couldve easily been traded to ORL with a second and cash), and mark madsen for Mark Blount and a little savings... i dunno.

Re: Q Rich for Blount

Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:05 am
by Calinks
YES my boy! The prodigal son returns!