ImageImageImage

NBA Power Rankings

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

NBA Power Rankings 

Post#1 » by cpfsf » Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:47 pm

:reporter: :reporter: :reporter:

http://www.nba.com/2009/news/powerrankings/08/17/offseason.rankings/index.html

#27

The David Kahn era is less than three months old, but he's certainly made his mark. His is a long-term plan and the Wolves have got the building blocks for a bright future, but Kahn may be the only one who thinks drafting two point guards back-to-back was a good idea.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,286
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#2 » by shrink » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:10 pm

Thanks for posting .. it was an interesting read.

Part of me hopes that we were 30th, because I've resigned myself to our season starting in 2010. Foye and Mike Miller weren't stars, but I think we will feel their loss. However, I was surprised to see a few teams above us (like MIL).

I don't think we'll be as bad as some people think.

I don't know if that's a good thing.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,332
And1: 12,189
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#3 » by Worm Guts » Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:14 pm

shrink wrote:
I don't think we'll be as bad as some people think.

I don't know if that's a good thing.


Hopefully we won't be as bad as people think. That would imply that our young players our good. It's nice to have a high draft pick, but it doesn't mean as much if Jonny Flynn is a bust, Kevin Love regresses, and Al Jefferson never recovers from injury.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#4 » by cpfsf » Tue Aug 18, 2009 7:10 pm

shrink wrote:Thanks for posting .. it was an interesting read.

Part of me hopes that we were 30th, because I've resigned myself to our season starting in 2010. Foye and Mike Miller weren't stars, but I think we will feel their loss. However, I was surprised to see a few teams above us (like MIL).

I don't think we'll be as bad as some people think.

I don't know if that's a good thing.


It's because of this I'm looking into the 2010 draft. I know it's too soon, but it's too bad a ton of the prospects are power forwards.

Basing this off the rankings, we have our own pick (most likely 1-6), Utah's 21st pick, Houston's 45th pick, and we won't be awarded Charlotte's pick (which makes me really happy).
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,235
And1: 17,158
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#5 » by Calinks » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:02 pm

I like that the Wizards are top ten I think a lot of people are sleeping on them.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#6 » by Devilzsidewalk » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:03 pm

better than I'd have thought, I'd think we'd be last, but he wisely realizes Jefferson/Love is massive beatdowns for everyone

*edit - just realized again another person pulls the "drafting 2 PGs was dumb" argument without offering up what a better solution would have been. You have.NO balls. Good day to you sir.
Image
User avatar
mnWI
General Manager
Posts: 8,550
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: Shaking babies and kissing hands

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#7 » by mnWI » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:06 pm

No way the Wolves are better than the Knicks this year. This roster is really bad right now. 29 or 30 is where I'd have them.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,522
And1: 4,979
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#8 » by theGreatRC » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:10 pm

I hope we're not as bad as they think.

Jefferson is supposed to be our "star", like Kevin Durant is to OKC. IF Jefferson returns to original form and Love continues to develop, we should be better than most people think. If we are bad or even worse, we should really think if Jefferson is our guy to lead the way.

Then again, we have nobody on our roster worth respecting outside of Jefferson and Love.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
mnWI
General Manager
Posts: 8,550
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: Shaking babies and kissing hands

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#9 » by mnWI » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:14 pm

theGreatRC wrote:I hope we're not as bad as they think.

Jefferson is supposed to be our "star", like Kevin Durant is to OKC. IF Jefferson returns to original form and Love continues to develop, we should be better than most people think. If we are bad or even worse, we should really think if Jefferson is our guy to lead the way.

Then again, we have nobody on our roster worth respecting outside of Jefferson and Love.

That's the thing. Al will be Al, Love is going to be better, but Flynn is a rookie, and will struggle. Gomes is very solid, and I think he'll have career numbers but the Wolves have the worst group of wings in the league. This is just a bad group outside a couple good pieces, and if the roster doesn't change much, I could see the Wolves with the worst record in the league.
IcemanMN
Sophomore
Posts: 125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 15, 2007

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#10 » by IcemanMN » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:18 pm

Kahn isn't done yet. With all due respect to his moves so far, there is no way in hell we are going into the regular season with a starting backcourt of Flynn and Ellington/Brewer.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,522
And1: 4,979
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#11 » by theGreatRC » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:19 pm

Yeah, after reading what I wrote, I realized our group is still young, and our vets aren't anything to tell your friends about.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#12 » by cpfsf » Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:29 pm

mnWI wrote:No way the Wolves are better than the Knicks this year. This roster is really bad right now. 29 or 30 is where I'd have them.


I think it takes into account that the Knicks didn't sign Lee and Robinson yet...and Rubio or Sessions for that matter. :lol:
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,727
And1: 22,293
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#13 » by Klomp » Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:28 am

mnWI wrote:
theGreatRC wrote:I hope we're not as bad as they think.

Jefferson is supposed to be our "star", like Kevin Durant is to OKC. IF Jefferson returns to original form and Love continues to develop, we should be better than most people think. If we are bad or even worse, we should really think if Jefferson is our guy to lead the way.

Then again, we have nobody on our roster worth respecting outside of Jefferson and Love.

That's the thing. Al will be Al, Love is going to be better, but Flynn is a rookie, and will struggle. Gomes is very solid, and I think he'll have career numbers but the Wolves have the worst group of wings in the league. This is just a bad group outside a couple good pieces, and if the roster doesn't change much, I could see the Wolves with the worst record in the league.


KD will be KD, Green is going to be better, but Harden is a rookie, and will struggle. Westbrook is very solid, and I think he'll have career numbers. This is just a bad group outside a couple good pieces, and if the roster doesn't change much, I could see the Thunder with the worst record in the league. (Could switch Green and Westbrook, but you get my drift.)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
mnWI
General Manager
Posts: 8,550
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: Shaking babies and kissing hands

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#14 » by mnWI » Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:48 am

klomp44 wrote:
mnWI wrote:
theGreatRC wrote:I hope we're not as bad as they think.

Jefferson is supposed to be our "star", like Kevin Durant is to OKC. IF Jefferson returns to original form and Love continues to develop, we should be better than most people think. If we are bad or even worse, we should really think if Jefferson is our guy to lead the way.

Then again, we have nobody on our roster worth respecting outside of Jefferson and Love.

That's the thing. Al will be Al, Love is going to be better, but Flynn is a rookie, and will struggle. Gomes is very solid, and I think he'll have career numbers but the Wolves have the worst group of wings in the league. This is just a bad group outside a couple good pieces, and if the roster doesn't change much, I could see the Wolves with the worst record in the league.


KD will be KD, Green is going to be better, but Harden is a rookie, and will struggle. Westbrook is very solid, and I think he'll have career numbers. This is just a bad group outside a couple good pieces, and if the roster doesn't change much, I could see the Thunder with the worst record in the league. (Could switch Green and Westbrook, but you get my drift.)

The situations aren't even comparable. This is essentially starting the first year of a rebuilding plan with the Wolves. They traded some proven pieces for younger talent, and became worse on the court this offseason as a result. The Thunder are in the third year of a rebuilding plan, and have much better pieces than the Wolves right now. I think people on this board underestimate how bad this Wolves team will be this year.

I'd be willing to wager that the Thunder finish with a better record than the Wolves. Probably way better.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#15 » by Esohny » Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:58 am

We will be very, very bad. Hopefully we're at least decent to watch, even when all the young guys struggle, and the team shows some steady improvement under Rambis.

And hopefully the Bobcats and Jazz are both mediocre and we end up with two picks from 13-20 to go with our own likely top 3 pick.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#16 » by 4ho5ive » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:32 am

Esohny wrote:We will be very, very bad. Hopefully we're at least decent to watch, even when all the young guys struggle, and the team shows some steady improvement under Rambis.

And hopefully the Bobcats and Jazz are both mediocre and we end up with two picks from 13-20 to go with our own likely top 3 pick.


Truth
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#17 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:08 am

I think Flynn is gonna be ultra bad ass though...
Image
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,727
And1: 22,293
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#18 » by Klomp » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:42 am

mnWI wrote:The situations aren't even comparable. This is essentially starting the first year of a rebuilding plan with the Wolves. They traded some proven pieces for younger talent, and became worse on the court this offseason as a result. The Thunder are in the third year of a rebuilding plan, and have much better pieces than the Wolves right now. I think people on this board underestimate how bad this Wolves team will be this year.

I'd be willing to wager that the Thunder finish with a better record than the Wolves. Probably way better.


Actually, we've been rebuilding since we traded KG. We're just doing a better job of it since the arrival of KAAAAAAAAHN.

I understand we'll be bad. We might even be worse than the Thunder. But we won't be the worst team in the NBA. Not when Zach Randolph and OJ Mayo are on the same team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
mnWI
General Manager
Posts: 8,550
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: Shaking babies and kissing hands

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#19 » by mnWI » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:51 am

klomp44 wrote:
mnWI wrote:The situations aren't even comparable. This is essentially starting the first year of a rebuilding plan with the Wolves. They traded some proven pieces for younger talent, and became worse on the court this offseason as a result. The Thunder are in the third year of a rebuilding plan, and have much better pieces than the Wolves right now. I think people on this board underestimate how bad this Wolves team will be this year.

I'd be willing to wager that the Thunder finish with a better record than the Wolves. Probably way better.


Actually, we've been rebuilding since we traded KG. We're just doing a better job of it since the arrival of KAAAAAAAAHN.

I understand we'll be bad. We might even be worse than the Thunder. But we won't be the worst team in the NBA. Not when Zach Randolph and OJ Mayo are on the same team.

It's too early to say what type of job Kahn is doing. And we undertook a rebuilding under McHale, yes, but the process has started over with the arrival of a new GM. So we're taking a step back into the year one of a rebuild (by trading away productive veterans), while OKC has had a set plan since the arrival of the very intelligent Sam Presti, and they have quality starters at just about every position now, and a couple decent players off the bench.

I think Memphis finishes with a better record than the Wolves too (pending injuries of course). The Kings are the only team I could see potentially being worse right now, but I may change my opinion depending on any moves before camp on our end. This team could even be historically bad if left as is.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: NBA Power Rankings 

Post#20 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Aug 19, 2009 2:08 pm

historically bad? Its not that bad of a team, holy christ
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves