Shaq Retires a (min) Laker
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:11 am
If she was traded here, he'd certainly retire!
I understand that CLE wouldn't do this deal now, but suppose 38-year old Shaq breaks down soon. ITs pretty hypothetical but would the Wolves do this trade?
MIN GETS: injured Shaq
CLE GETS: Gomes + Songalia + Blount + $3.64 mil TPE.
I said in a different thread that I didn't think Gomes had enough trade value to move Songalia, but with enough cash, and sending them to a win-now team .. maybe there's a way.
FOR CLE, Gomes would fit nicely, though Songalia's back-up role would be limited. CLE's over the lux this year, but under (so far) in 2010.
For MIN, they move both of their contracts that extend into 2010, adding close to $6 mil in raw cap space. The net salaries, adding in Songalia's second year is a little over a million more. We probably save more on a Shaq buy-out, where our climate actually helps us in a free agent negotiation. We get more minutes to toss around, and more roster spaces.
I understand that CLE wouldn't do this deal now, but suppose 38-year old Shaq breaks down soon. ITs pretty hypothetical but would the Wolves do this trade?
MIN GETS: injured Shaq
CLE GETS: Gomes + Songalia + Blount + $3.64 mil TPE.
I said in a different thread that I didn't think Gomes had enough trade value to move Songalia, but with enough cash, and sending them to a win-now team .. maybe there's a way.
FOR CLE, Gomes would fit nicely, though Songalia's back-up role would be limited. CLE's over the lux this year, but under (so far) in 2010.
For MIN, they move both of their contracts that extend into 2010, adding close to $6 mil in raw cap space. The net salaries, adding in Songalia's second year is a little over a million more. We probably save more on a Shaq buy-out, where our climate actually helps us in a free agent negotiation. We get more minutes to toss around, and more roster spaces.