Page 1 of 1
Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:53 pm
by latino469
Hey, i don't mean to be a troll or anything but since you guys are bound to trade blount, i wonder if this trade seems fair or not.
Toronto Raptors
Marcus Banks(expiring), Reggie Evan(expiring)+ 2011 1st round pick+cash
for
blount+ rubio
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:04 pm
by GopherIt!
neither banks nor evans are expiring but 2010 be damned! we need PG and PF depth so I don't see how the Wolfies could pass this up. you might have to add a second rounder or two to sweeten it a little.
PG: Banks/Flynn/Sessions/Daniels/Ghost of Chucky
SG: Ellington/Sasha
SF: Gomes/Brewer/Wilkins
PF: Love/Jefferson/Evans/Hollins/Stewie/Gomes/Cardinal
C: Al/ Hollins
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:07 pm
by jade_hippo
i really don't want Banks on our team again as he is less than worthless, and Evans is a waste of a roster space here for a year.
so we swap our unwanted piece of junk, for 2 other pieces of junk and throw in rubio for a 1st rounder that could be in the 20-30 range if the Raptors stay good?
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:18 pm
by john2jer
latino469 wrote:Hey, i don't mean to be a troll or anything but since you guys are bound to trade blount, i wonder if this trade seems fair or not.
Toronto Raptors
Marcus Banks(expiring), Reggie Evan(expiring)+ 2011 1st round pick+cash
for
blount+ rubio
The Wolves wouldn't trade Blount for that pile of trash, much less add in Rubio. You sir are a troll.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:21 pm
by Esohny
latino469 wrote:Hey, i don't mean to be a troll or anything but since you guys are bound to trade blount, i wonder if this trade seems fair or not.
Toronto Raptors
Marcus Banks(expiring), Reggie Evan(expiring)+ 2011 1st round pick+cash
for
blount+ rubio
Perhaps you don't mean to be a troll, but regardless, you've managed to concoct one terrible trade. I had to walk outside and spit after reading it.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:26 pm
by latino469
john2jer wrote:latino469 wrote:Hey, i don't mean to be a troll or anything but since you guys are bound to trade blount, i wonder if this trade seems fair or not.
Toronto Raptors
Marcus Banks(expiring), Reggie Evan(expiring)+ 2011 1st round pick+cash
for
blount+ rubio
The Wolves wouldn't trade Blount for that pile of trash, much less add in Rubio. You sir are a troll.
lol
one thing though, blount is trash also, this isn't about him or banks, evans. It's about money(expiring).
so basically it's our 1st and cash for rubio, who isn't even going to play one game with you guys.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:31 pm
by B Calrissian
Esohny wrote:
Perhaps you don't mean to be a troll, but regardless, you've managed to concoct one terrible trade. I had to walk outside and spit after reading it.
I thought it was bad when I glanced at it.. Blount for all that crap? A 1st is not worth taking on all that dead weight.
Then I saw Rubio was in the deal.. Funny stuff.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:32 pm
by GopherIt!
I want my two rounders!
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:33 pm
by B Calrissian
latino469 wrote:
lol
one thing though, blount is trash also, this isn't about him or banks, evans. It's about money(expiring).
so basically it's our 1st and cash for rubio, who isn't even going to play one game with you guys.
As mentioned, Evans and Banks aren't expirings. Throw this trade on the trade board and see what they think of it.
TROLL
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:41 pm
by jade_hippo
latino469 wrote:one thing though, blount is trash also, this isn't about him or banks, evans. It's about money(expiring).
so basically it's our 1st and cash for rubio, who isn't even going to play one game with you guys.
yes Blount is trash, but he's expiring trash, and he only takes up one roster spot.
and if you mean to imply all we will be able to get for Rubio is a really bad 1st round pick you may be a little off on your value.
counteroffer: throw in Bosh since he'll never play for you again and another first, and we'll give you Cardinal
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:53 pm
by john2jer
latino469 wrote:john2jer wrote:latino469 wrote:Hey, i don't mean to be a troll or anything but since you guys are bound to trade blount, i wonder if this trade seems fair or not.
Toronto Raptors
Marcus Banks(expiring), Reggie Evan(expiring)+ 2011 1st round pick+cash
for
blount+ rubio
The Wolves wouldn't trade Blount for that pile of trash, much less add in Rubio. You sir are a troll.
lol
one thing though, blount is trash also, this isn't about him or banks, evans. It's about money(expiring).
so basically it's our 1st and cash for rubio, who isn't even going to play one game with you guys.
Blount is expiring. Banks and Evans aren't. So basically this becomes a future 1st for Rubio? No thanks. You tried to disguise your pile of garbage as a Blount trade, but failed.
Your response confirms that you're just a troll.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:53 pm
by GopherIt!
J2J I think you are over reacting. I mean, neither Banks nor Evans are expiring and we do lose Rubio but those things are besides the point. The point is that we make Latino456 ¡contento!
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:32 am
by latino469
oh crap
sorry guys i honestly thought banks and evans were expirings .
Never mind lol
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:56 am
by moss_is_1
latino469 wrote:oh crap
sorry guys i honestly thought banks and evans were expirings .
Never mind lol
like that would make the deal better. idiot.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 3:21 am
by B Calrissian
moss_is_1 wrote:latino469 wrote:oh crap
sorry guys i honestly thought banks and evans were expirings .
Never mind lol
like that would make the deal better. idiot.
If Banks and Evans were in fact expirings that
would make the deal better. Still an easy pass but nowhere near as easy as passing on a trade that sends Rubio out for 10 mil in dead weight and a late 1st.
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 3:47 am
by Marc
THIS TRADE IS BAD AS HELL AND EVANS AND BANKS ARE NOT EXPIRING! BLOUNT IS!
Re: Blount trade: what you think?
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:50 pm
by john2jer
Marc wrote:THIS TRADE IS BAD AS HELL AND EVANS AND BANKS ARE NOT EXPIRING! BLOUNT IS!
What?