RealGM

Jordan Hill and Wilson Chandler for Ricky Rubio and Pecherov

BRIGGS wrote:Jordan Hill and Wilson Chandler for Ricky Rubio and Pecherov

No thanks, Jordan Hill has not shown anything yet. Wilson has done well so far but Pecherov has played strong oversees and Rubio is holding his own.

I would rather see them in our uniform or wait for a better trade.

Lastly, I doubt we actually end up with Pecherov, Jefferson and Love all on our team. So I doubt we see us bringing in Hill while also having Jefferson and Love.

BRIGGS wrote:Jordan Hill and Wilson Chandler for Ricky Rubio and Pecherov

Then they would say ... well, OK, give us the Rubio's rights and Pecherov can stay with you.

But I think this trade is "today's food and tomorrow's hunger"

im mad at the fact that a knick fan would offer this trade. It does nothing for NY. We lose the 8th overall pick and chandler for a player we dont know how good they are and a player that wont play in 2010-2011

GalloFan22 wrote:im mad at the fact that a knick fan would offer this trade. It does nothing for NY. We lose the 8th overall pick and chandler for a player we dont know how good they are and a player that wont play in 2010-2011

Two months ago maybe, but now I don't want to see Rubio playing for NY. Fortunately, they never had fukkin idea about basketball, .. and still haven't it ...

Wolves easily pass. A 3rd 6'9" PF who's shown nothing and a chucker in Chandler? Not enough.

Lob is right on this one.

how about Gallinari + Chandler, I'd be open to that

Devilzsidewalk wrote:how about Gallinari + Chandler, I'd be open to that

Gallinari and Hill and I'm in.

yea that's probably better. Knicks fans definitely would be pissed at that offer though, but its kind of out of sight out of mind w/ Rubio right now, once the idea of him actual playing in the NBA becomes real, then that's very easily a low-ball offer for him. Talent-wise, nothing has happened to drop his stock at all, just that nobody knows when he's gonna be in the NBA, but I'd guess sooner rather than later.

Gallinari + Chandler, yes... I'd do it too..

Chandler is not much different than Brewer at this point. I don't want another offensive black hole at the SF spot. He's taking 13.1 shots to make 11.5 points per game so far this season. Brewer is taking 13.0 shots to make 12.4 ppg. Chandler is a career 42.8% shooter and doing worse than that this year. He's not allowed to play on the same team as Brewer.

This deal is basically Galinari for Rubio straight up, so I say no. I need more than that for Rubio.

GalloFan22 wrote:im mad at the fact that a knick fan would offer this trade. It does nothing for NY. We lose the 8th overall pick and chandler for a player we dont know how good they are and a player that wont play in 2010-2011

Gallinari and Jordan Hill? im mad at the fact that a wolves fan would offer this trade. It does nothing for MIN. We lose the 5th overall pick and Pekerov for a player we dont know how good they are and a player with a bad back.

Seriously though, I think its a fair offer, but I'd rather gamble on Rubio's upside. Until he (and Pek) have been watched more, they won't get big offers back in trade. And Gallo's back problems at his young age really does worry me.

GalloFan22 wrote:We lose the 8th overall pick and chandler

it's confusing when you use the phrase "8th overall pick" as a euphemism for "bust"