Page 1 of 3

Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:19 pm
by The J Rocka

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:22 pm
by Calinks
I can only read the first few sentences but I agree. I look at the nets roster and see some talented scorers and a few good defenders. Wolves have no offense and no defense. I definitely think the Nets are the better team right now.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:27 pm
by Wolves2011
J_Era_3 wrote:According to....Hollinger

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/ ... iem-091201


This was written Before, the day before the wolves won game 2.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:28 pm
by Esohny
Meh. We're both terrible, so it's splitting hairs.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:28 pm
by deeney0
The way I'd judge it is that the Wolves played better in their two wins and in a couple of their losses than the Nets have all season. The Wolves have also played worse in several of the losses than the Nets have all season.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:33 pm
by The J Rocka
Wolves2011 wrote:
J_Era_3 wrote:According to....Hollinger

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insider/ ... iem-091201


This was written Before, the day before the wolves won game 2.


But he updates it, edits everything

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:33 pm
by Wolves2011
Who would you rather build around

Lopez
Harris
Yi
Douglas Roberts
Lee

or

Jefferson
Love
Rubio
Flynn
Sessions

with any of those pieces being tradeable assets.....

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:39 pm
by The J Rocka
Wolves2011 wrote:Who would you rather build around

Lopez
Harris
Yi
Douglas Roberts
Lee

or

Jefferson
Love
Rubio
Flynn
Sessions

with any of those pieces being tradeable assets.....


If im a star FA, MN is looking more solid

and we will add Wall, Aldrich, or Turner to that mix as well

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:40 pm
by RD&KG2
Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Tue Dec 1, 2009 11:47 pm
by cpfsf
Can't we all just agree we're the worst two teams.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 12:32 am
by sfernald
RD&KG2 wrote:Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.



Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?

You got two PFs and three PGS!! LOL!!

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 12:56 am
by Esohny
sfernald wrote:
RD&KG2 wrote:Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.



Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?

You got two PFs and three PGS!! LOL!!


And you're the guy that thinks that trading all our cap space for Jeffries, a bench player and a 2nd rounder is the best use of our resources.

You're a joke!! LOL!!

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 1:02 am
by sfernald
Esohny wrote:
sfernald wrote:
RD&KG2 wrote:Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.



Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?

You got two PFs and three PGS!! LOL!!

You're a joke!! LOL!!


Attacking me personally just reflects your insecurity. And changing the subject doesn't change the fact you have a pretty good poker hand there - full house - point guards over power forwards... If you draw John Wall, then you have got yourself four of a kind!!

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 1:07 am
by Esohny
I attack your ridiculous ideas, of which there are many. I do like the hypocritical accusations after your opener:

sfernald wrote:Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?


And changing the subject doesn't change the fact you have a pretty good poker hand there - full house - point guards over power forwards... If you draw John Wall, then you have got yourself four of a kind!!


I know, sadly for us, the NBA doesn't allow trades to be made between teams. Wait, they do. You're still a joke.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 1:09 am
by sfernald
Esohny wrote:I attack your ridiculous ideas, of which there are many. I do like the hypocritical accusations after your opener:

sfernald wrote:Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?


And changing the subject doesn't change the fact you have a pretty good poker hand there - full house - point guards over power forwards... If you draw John Wall, then you have got yourself four of a kind!!


I know, sadly for us, the NBA doesn't allow trades to be made between teams. Wait, they do. You're still a joke.


I'm not arguing with you. please leave me alone.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 9:34 am
by big3_8_19_21
It looks like we have found ourselves a troll with low self-esteem :lol:

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 10:42 am
by jade_hippo
i think the fact the wolves may very well begin next season with only Flynn, Jefferson, Love as the only guys on the roster from this years opening day speaks volumes about where the wolves expected to be this year. at the most we'd have Flynn Sessions Brew Ellington Gomes Love Jefferson Hollins next year. still leaving 4-7 open roster spots and some HUGE holes to fill at SG/SF/C

the nets, are only going to lose a couple of guys this summer. Simmons, Hassel and Hayes being their only expirings if my brain is working right. They are pretty set in their roster and are hoping that it grows and gets better, and hope they add a piece or two to agument. I think they are hoping the starting lineup they have will be contending for a playoff spot.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 12:02 pm
by lobishome
I think that to be better team than NETS is a stupid solace,

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 1:21 pm
by GopherIt!
Ridiculous question. Nets have zero wins, Wolves have two.

0/2 = 0

We're at least zero times better than the Nets right now.

Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?

Posted: Wed Dec 2, 2009 1:28 pm
by Worm Guts
Shouldn't it be 2/0? The Wolves are an undefined amount better than the Nets