RealGM

I'd know some of this has to have been said before, but this is what's on my mind today.(especially the 2nd one with POR)


MN-BOS: Gomes/Pavlovic for Scalabrine/Giddens/future 1st

MN-LAL: Wilkins/Hart for Morrison/Memphis 2nd

MN-Orl: any 2 of Pavlovic/Pecherov/Jawai for Redick

MN-POR: Gomes/Jawai for Outlaw/rights to Claver
or Gomes/Sessions/Pavlovic/Jawai for Blake/Outlaw/Fernandez/Claver

MN-OKC: Jefferson/Sessions/Ellington for Harden/Green/Collison/Livingston/1st

Any thoughts?

MIA - MIN

MIA out : Michael Beasley, Fran Vázquez rights

MIN out : Percherova, Pavlovic, Jawai, Pekovic rights

(This trade is based in "Miami GM is stupid" concept)

lobishome wrote:MIA - MIN

MIA out : Michael Beasley, Fran Vázquez rights

MIN out : Percherova, Pavlovic, Jawai, Pekovic rights

(This trade is based in "Miami GM is stupid" concept)

Percherova sounds like a Russian women's tennis player. Do we own the rights to her?

Good trades Danimals! I might not do the last one, but I like the idea for all of them.

If you're still board, you might try throwing each one of the trade board, with your reasoning for each, and see what the impartial mob thinks. Personally I think they are pretty fair.

ORL has the rights to Fran Vazquez.

shrink wrote:Good trades Danimals! I might not do the last one, but I like the idea for all of them.

If you're still board, you might try throwing each one of the trade board, with your reasoning for each, and see what the impartial mob thinks. Personally I think they are pretty fair.

I think you meant to write "hyper-partisan mob"...

shrink wrote:ORL has the rights to Fran Vazquez.

It's no important, Miami will say NO. What are they going to do with this three bluffs?

mandurugo wrote:

shrink wrote:Good trades Danimals! I might not do the last one, but I like the idea for all of them.

If you're still board, you might try throwing each one of the trade board, with your reasoning for each, and see what the impartial mob thinks. Personally I think they are pretty fair.

I think you meant to write "hyper-partisan mob"...

LOL! Too true.

I find it useful that if you can make a trade that creates so much trade value for both teams that both sides of the hyper-partisan mob think its a good deal, you probably have something. Comments from third parties are valuable too.

I'm concerned that if we do a trade like this we might end up breaking the record for the worst season n NBA history.