Page 1 of 1
which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:18 am
by thecouch
2010 salary divide by (points+rebounds+steals+assists+blocks)
nathan jawai $98715
wayne ellington $104646
kevin love $110963
jonny flynn $135336
corey brewer $136778
oleksiy pecherov $170821
sasha pavlovic $207182
ryan hollins $211768
ryan gomes $220913
alando tucker $223275
ramon sessions $260146
damien wilkins $287866
al jefferson $381800
mark blount $1189160
brian cardinal $1824324
this does not take in how many games or minutes they have played .just there stats when they are on the court
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:23 am
by Krapinsky
I hope you didn't wast too much time with that
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:10 am
by Diggler
I think you're kind of oversimplifying a bit. For example, you can't count 1 block as equal to 1 point. If it was as easy to get a block as it was to score a point, you'd be seeing people with 30 blocks per game. Interesting idea though.
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:11 am
by Breakdown777
I'm not sure which WOLVE I think is overpaid. Maybe I'll go ask my WIVE while she is chopping carrots with a KNIVE.
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:54 am
by shangrila
If your formula doesn't say Sasha Pavlovic, your formula is wrong.
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:02 pm
by Foye
shangrila wrote:If your formula doesn't say Sasha Pavlovic, your formula is wrong.
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:11 pm
by C.lupus
Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:35 pm
by Foye
C.lupus wrote:Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?
Shouldn't it be infinite? Because he hasn't had a positive stat this season yet
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:20 pm
by Calinks
Foye wrote:C.lupus wrote:Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?
Shouldn't it be infinite? Because he hasn't had a positive stat this season yet
Yet he still has done more good for this team on the court than Sasha Pavlovic.
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Wed Feb 3, 2010 5:27 pm
by Devilzsidewalk
looks about right to me
Re: which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)
Posted: Wed Feb 3, 2010 5:29 pm
by Foye
Calinks wrote:Foye wrote:C.lupus wrote:Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?
Shouldn't it be infinite? Because he hasn't had a positive stat this season yet
Yet he still has done more good for this team on the court than Sasha Pavlovic.
I agree with you.