Ballerhogger wrote:?s=20&t=57mesiAeHW4lxI8Q_POjeA
Hard pass.

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
Hello Brooklyn wrote:I don't care if Memphis offers JJJ. Thats not enough.
Boston offer is far better. Hard pass.
TheNetsFan wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:TheNetsFan wrote:A Memphis offer would likely be based on JJJ and picks. I'd insist on Bane as well & forgo some picks. I'd offer to send back Curry or Cam in the deal too if it meant JJJ & Bane. JJJ-Simmons-Harris-Bane-Irving with O'Neale, Sharpe, Mills & Edwards off the bench is a fun team.
Stress fractures for big guys are no joke, so Memphis has to add a lot to JJJ to make a deal worthwhile. He's a distressed asset at this point, not all that dissimilar from the Simmons situation with the Harden trade.
It doesn't work cash wise. We can only send out KD, and they would have to send us back both JJJ, Bane, and Zaire Williams + picks
I'd take the risk on JJJ.
The expiring deals of Green or New Zealand's own Steven Adams would be in the deal as filler. Salary matching is the easy part.
JJJ is worth the risk, but can't be the only non-pick piece of significance.
Ballerhogger wrote:?s=20&t=57mesiAeHW4lxI8Q_POjeA
gigantes wrote:Does anyone else here think that the team is angling too hard for young, current stars?
Because it's really hard for me to have confidence in KI&KD staying the whole season and winning a new championship, so shouldn't Marks (& Tsai) be looking at a semi-reset here? By that I mean, Marks using his traditionally strong ability to spot talent and ask for young, potential stars and extra picks to replenish the cupboard. I.e., instead of asking for more obvious talent, thereby cutting down on future picks in the deal.
It's like we're stuck trying to achieve multiple goals here, ultimately being a master of none.
Seriously-- what is the team's actual goal, going forward?
Because if it's still winning a title in the near-term, then I am laughing.
In the meantime, several times now I've seen direct or oblique mention of Tsai strongly wanting to field a playoff team in order to maintain a certain amount of popular interest in Nets/Barclay's assets, ultimately helping make his books work. So, that makes sense to me from a pure business-POV, but also seems like it could really hinder the team from making an efficient turnaround from the current flustercluck. Again, isn't it easier to get where you're going when you have less goals, compared to more goals?
All that bloviated, I think most of what I said above is hogwash if the Nets successfully get full or near-full trade value from KI&KD near the trade deadline, when their value is potentially higher. In fact I admire Marks' ability to hold his nerve and stay patient, not making a trade just for trade's sake. Just to appease fan angst, that sort of thing.
Sheesh, what a crazy sitchy-ayshun this whole thing is. :S
gigantes wrote:Does anyone else here think that the team is angling too hard for young, current stars?
Because it's really hard for me to have confidence in KI&KD staying the whole season and winning a new championship, so shouldn't Marks (& Tsai) be looking at a semi-reset here? By that I mean, Marks using his traditionally strong ability to spot talent and ask for young, potential stars and extra picks to replenish the cupboard. I.e., instead of asking for more obvious talent, thereby cutting down on future picks in the deal.
It's like we're stuck trying to achieve multiple goals here, ultimately being a master of none.
Seriously-- what is the team's actual goal, going forward?
Because if it's still winning a title in the near-term, then I am laughing.
In the meantime, several times now I've seen direct or oblique mention of Tsai strongly wanting to field a playoff team in order to maintain a certain amount of popular interest in Nets/Barclay's assets, ultimately helping make his books work. So, that makes sense to me from a pure business-POV, but also seems like it could really hinder the team from making an efficient turnaround from the current flustercluck. Again, isn't it easier to get where you're going when you have less goals, compared to more goals?
All that bloviated, I think most of what I said above is hogwash if the Nets successfully get full or near-full trade value from KI&KD near the trade deadline, when their value is potentially higher. In fact I admire Marks' ability to hold his nerve and stay patient, not making a trade just for trade's sake. Just to appease fan angst, that sort of thing.
Sheesh, what a crazy sitchy-ayshun this whole thing is. :S
sashaturiaf wrote:
Pure comedy.
Have to thank all these trolling offers we received for KD. Probably played a part in motivating his sensitive ass to run it back with us in a prove it "you know who I am" season.
Tha King wrote:Bridges, Cam Johnson, and picks imo is better than something like Brown/Ingram and a pick or two
Bridges career on/off: +6.4
Mitchell: +1.5
Brown: +1.0
Ingram: +0.9
Bridges might never be a secondary scorer but he impacts the game and helps you win more than a lot of players that are looked at as all stars. I also wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a ~20ppg player in a more expanded role to go along with his elite defense and everything else he brings to a team. Cam Johnson gives you a 6'8 wing putting up 43% from 3 on 6 attempts (similar attempts as Joe) in his third season in the league.
Simmons, Bridges, and Cam Johnson is a very good fit offensively and defensively and essentially gives you the most valuable position in the league right now sorted for the next few years along with draft picks to build around. It would need a primary scorer but you can get to that down the road when looking to contend and that type of player isn't coming back in a KD trade anyways (Brown, Ingram, Mitchell, etc. are not that imo).
Tha King wrote:Tha King wrote:Bridges, Cam Johnson, and picks imo is better than something like Brown/Ingram and a pick or two
Bridges career on/off: +6.4
Mitchell: +1.5
Brown: +1.0
Ingram: +0.9
Bridges might never be a secondary scorer but he impacts the game and helps you win more than a lot of players that are looked at as all stars. I also wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a ~20ppg player in a more expanded role to go along with his elite defense and everything else he brings to a team. Cam Johnson gives you a 6'8 wing putting up 43% from 3 on 6 attempts (similar attempts as Joe) in his third season in the league.
Simmons, Bridges, and Cam Johnson is a very good fit offensively and defensively and essentially gives you the most valuable position in the league right now sorted for the next few years along with draft picks to build around. It would need a primary scorer but you can get to that down the road when looking to contend and that type of player isn't coming back in a KD trade anyways (Brown, Ingram, Mitchell, etc. are not that imo).
Been said, day one.
Just forget the Simmons part
Tha King wrote:Tha King wrote:Bridges, Cam Johnson, and picks imo is better than something like Brown/Ingram and a pick or two
Bridges career on/off: +6.4
Mitchell: +1.5
Brown: +1.0
Ingram: +0.9
Bridges might never be a secondary scorer but he impacts the game and helps you win more than a lot of players that are looked at as all stars. I also wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a ~20ppg player in a more expanded role to go along with his elite defense and everything else he brings to a team. Cam Johnson gives you a 6'8 wing putting up 43% from 3 on 6 attempts (similar attempts as Joe) in his third season in the league.
Simmons, Bridges, and Cam Johnson is a very good fit offensively and defensively and essentially gives you the most valuable position in the league right now sorted for the next few years along with draft picks to build around. It would need a primary scorer but you can get to that down the road when looking to contend and that type of player isn't coming back in a KD trade anyways (Brown, Ingram, Mitchell, etc. are not that imo).
Been said, day one.
Just forget the Simmons part
Netaman wrote:gotta be honest i really like that Suns package. bummed about the glitch for Bam, but I have always like Bridges. I wanted to trade up for him in that draft. Ayton is whatever without KD still here but that's a legit team so at least Houston wont be getting top 5 picks.
Simmons
Seth
Brown / Harris
Bridges
Ayton
shoot kyrie to the moon and im excited about next year and what they decide to do with all their new picks.
Netaman wrote:playing around with the trade machine if we don't want Ayton i think i'd do this. http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=258bhwqr
(basically KD for Bridges, Cam Johnson, filler + max picks).
we'd basically have a crap ton of 3 and D wings around Simmons/Curry/Harris/Patty and Claxton inside.
Simmons / Patty
Seth / Cam
O'Neale / Harris
Bridges / Other Cam
Claxton / Sharpe
Presumably their next move would be looking for more of a stretch C to compliment Claxton (ideally as part of the salary filler return in a kyrie deal?). Powell/Dinwiddie for Kyrie would fit this roster pretty well.
i'm pretty sure this kind of deal eliminates a lot of the complications with BYC and S&T stuff, though I presume it's maybe not enough which is why there's the current complication of figuring out what they can turn Ayton into (or how they can do a deal with him via S&T). if they dealt Harris I think they'd even be in position to have some cap room next summer.
Not sure there's anyone better than Ayton worth saving money for which is why i'd probably ultimately take the deal with him + bridges.