ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#61 » by VCRJKidd15 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:32 am

SMH at the people who took the Ewing JR. signing serious.
User avatar
SpeedyG
RealGM
Posts: 15,501
And1: 1,310
Joined: Mar 07, 2003

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#62 » by SpeedyG » Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:49 am

Why are we talking about Ewing Jr.?

We should go after someone related to Charles Oakley and John Starks. That should get the Knick faithful riled up.

Lawlz at Knicks fans with the Ewing and Duhon comments.
Bless the man if his heart and his land are one ~ FrancisM, R.I.P. 3/6/09
NYKAL
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 2,157
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Location: LAND O NOD

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#63 » by NYKAL » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:38 pm

Wrighteous wrote:
VCRJKidd15 wrote:im sorry did we just lose to the knicks? Did brook lopez get shot? why did he only play 28 minutes. I do not know what the Nets have against defending in the 3rd qrt but they suck at it. Well suck at defending overall. Al Harrington was just taking a dump on Yi horrible defense.

why are you surprised? your team is not good.


UMM knick won 3 out of four last season. Jason Kidd is gone. Lose the arrogance and have some respect for your cross town rival.
NYKAL
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 2,157
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Location: LAND O NOD

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#64 » by NYKAL » Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:40 pm

Lopez was killing. Why didn't he play the 2nd half
knicksNOTslick
RealGM
Posts: 17,867
And1: 5,173
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: NYC Queens
     

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#65 » by knicksNOTslick » Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:08 pm

Rich Rane wrote:
knicksNOTslick wrote:When was the last time the Nets were relevant?


The period after the last time the Knicks were. I like to call it the Kidd Era.

Real reason why the Knicks won:

We had the better PG.

Sorry, it's the truth.


:lol:

See...I could take a joke.

Even during the Kidd era, the Nets were irrelevant. They made the Finals and nobody cared.

Devin Harris is the better player but Duhon's the better PG. It wasn't a joke. Nets would've won if Harris had Duhon's PG skills. But he doesn't.
Rockice_8
Banned User
Posts: 1,673
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#66 » by Rockice_8 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:12 pm

NYKAL wrote:Lopez was killing. Why didn't he play the 2nd half


I was at the game last night and Lopez and Yi were not playing great but we did have the lead. Then we don't see Lopez or Yi for most of the third and we fall behind. Frank played Swift and Anderson most of the second half. Yi didn't get back in until like 3 min left in the 4th after the game was practically out of reach. Not happy with the sub pattern by Frank last night. It's not like Swift and Anderson were lighting it up or are lock down defenders. Terrible coaching by Frank much of the loss tonight I blame on him.
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,951
And1: 15,620
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#67 » by Rich Rane » Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:19 pm

NYKAL wrote:Lose the arrogance and have some respect for your cross town rival.


Like these guys have been showing respect?

Wrighteous wrote:why are you surprised? your team is not good.


knicksNOTslick wrote:When was the last time the Nets were relevant?


knicksNOTslick wrote:Even during the Kidd era, the Nets were irrelevant. They made the Finals and nobody cared.


Seriously, you'll forgive us if we don't christen you Eastern Conference Champions just yet.
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,951
And1: 15,620
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#68 » by Rich Rane » Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:24 pm

knicksNOTslick wrote:Even during the Kidd era, the Nets were irrelevant. They made the Finals and nobody cared.


Just because NY's sports teams buried themselves in ditches didn't mean the rest of the country didn't take notice.

Devin Harris is the better player but Duhon's the better PG. It wasn't a joke. Nets would've won if Harris had Duhon's PG skills. But he doesn't.


Is that why Duhon led the Chicago Bulls to consecutive contention?

I like D'Antoni...he proves that Nash's numbers, a great PG in his own right, were inflated. You might want to throw him in every sentence when Duhon is mentioned.
G_MoNeY
Veteran
Posts: 2,613
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 19, 2004

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#69 » by G_MoNeY » Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:44 pm

In other news, look at this bombshell.

Carter gave a curious answer after being asked if he should be taking more than the 12 shots he attempted Wednesday.

“I don’t know,” said Carter, who was 7-of-12 and scored 18 points. “You’d better ask the coach. I don’t get into that.”

NYKAL
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 2,157
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Location: LAND O NOD

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#70 » by NYKAL » Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:56 pm

Rich Rane wrote:
NYKAL wrote:Lose the arrogance and have some respect for your cross town rival.


Like these guys have been showing respect?

Wrighteous wrote:why are you surprised? your team is not good.


knicksNOTslick wrote:When was the last time the Nets were relevant?


knicksNOTslick wrote:Even during the Kidd era, the Nets were irrelevant. They made the Finals and nobody cared.


Seriously, you'll forgive us if we don't christen you Eastern Conference Champions just yet.


maybe some of that was in response to the first few pages here (most were in response to direct comments. Thats truly neither here or there. This is your board and visitors should show some respect. In fact the teams fans should respect each other

The Knick and Nets (if) being good at the same time is a very, very good thing for the tristate area and the economy. I said it here back when kidd came. If only we could both be relevant at the same time. Teams fear their road trips through the texas triangle. How cool would it be for teams to dread coming to the tristate.
SteveNets15
Starter
Posts: 2,335
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Location: NJNETS

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#71 » by SteveNets15 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:28 pm

knicksNOTslick wrote:
Rich Rane wrote:When was the last time a Knick fan could take a joke?

When was the last time the Nets were relevant?




Real reason why the Knicks won:

We had the better PG.

Sorry, it's the truth.


The knicks haven't been relevant for almost DECADE NOW and still aren't,so don't get so excited over a good 2nd half of basketball.Devin took a dump on duhon but he should of got the ball to VC in the 4th.Then again if Devin made those shots in the 4th he would've been a hero.Nice steal for the knicks on the road even tho there were more knicks fans than nets fan but what else is new.
User avatar
NjNeTs1029
Starter
Posts: 2,408
And1: 98
Joined: Jan 28, 2007
   

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#72 » by NjNeTs1029 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:36 pm

NYKAL wrote:Lopez was killing. Why didn't he play the 2nd half


because we have a moron for a coach.
User avatar
howe070523
Pro Prospect
Posts: 866
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 31, 2007

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#73 » by howe070523 » Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:10 pm

Why we are getting Knickerbocker fans coming to this board telling us we are not a good team?
You guys are not even over .500 yet --- respect? respect my arse, you dont come to other team's board and yell "your team is not good" when ur own record is worse.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#74 » by vincecarter4pres » Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:34 pm

G_MoNeY wrote:In other news, look at this bombshell.

Carter gave a curious answer after being asked if he should be taking more than the 12 shots he attempted Wednesday.

“I don’t know,” said Carter, who was 7-of-12 and scored 18 points. “You’d better ask the coach. I don’t get into that.”



Yes.

Fire Frank FTW!
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
NYKAL
General Manager
Posts: 8,628
And1: 2,157
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Location: LAND O NOD

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#75 » by NYKAL » Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:35 pm

howe070523 wrote:Why we are getting Knickerbocker fans coming to this board telling us we are not a good team?
You guys are not even over .500 yet --- respect? respect my arse, you dont come to other team's board and yell "your team is not good" when ur own record is worse.


your right (have to give you that.)

Knicks haven't had a winning season in too long. What you have to realize is that the Nets have had NY's card for years. Since Kidd came.

Some feel validated because of some of the negative Knick comments early in the thread. But this is your board and you can post whatever you like.

I have to admit to being one of the geeked out Knick fans happy to see ny take 3out of 4 last season and the 1st win this season. Kidd abused us so much that beating you guys feels like vindication even if the history of the last few years is extremely lopsided in your favor.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets vs Knicks (Game 20) 

Post#76 » by vincecarter4pres » Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:55 pm

knicksNOTslick wrote:Devin Harris is the better player but Duhon's the better PG. It wasn't a joke. Nets would've won if Harris had Duhon's PG skills. But he doesn't.


sig'd. :lol:
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#77 » by NetsForce » Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:44 am

Any team that realistically wanted to make the playoffs would not start Chris Duhon.

Duhon = Backup PG
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

Re: Official Game Thread: Knicks 121 Nets 109 Final 

Post#78 » by Da big3 » Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:24 am

nets are not relvant?, gee i wonder why, lets ee what the knicks are relvant for
1. not makin the playoffs in years
2. sexual harrsment lawsuits
3. Isiah Thomas
4. Stephon Marbury
5. only winning 23 games
6. Larry Brown era
7. Being so bad, once a proud franchise
8. Dumb trades and salary cap issues
9. Eddy Curry
not reasons i want my team to be relvant for, that being said i have alot of respect for the knicks, but dont get cocky over 1 win, lets face it the record is still 9-11...

Return to Brooklyn Nets