ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Game Thread: Nets 106 Knicks 101 Final

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

halfHAVOC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,864
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Contact:
 

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#21 » by halfHAVOC » Mon Mar 9, 2009 12:46 am

lmao @ gallo missin that finger roll

damn that wilson chandler dunk was sick

and im so glad VC put down a windmill, its been a while.
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#22 » by NetsForce » Mon Mar 9, 2009 12:51 am

Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
User avatar
Adam1221
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,600
And1: 397
Joined: Sep 12, 2007

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#23 » by Adam1221 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 12:53 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:I am starting to think this draft is not nearly as awful as people are making it out to be.

I remember last season people were saying the same thing before the tourneys started.

There are some really awesome prospects, just not too many big men after Griffin and if Monroe declares. I don't like Thabeet and he doesn't fit with us anyway and I am so-so on Hill, but he looks like he could be a really solid pro.

Then again, with the exception of point guards and about half a dozen other guys including Griffin, there might be a lot of really solid depth and not a lot of stars.


Well really now if you look at the impact prospects as in the guys that make loosing worth it, Griffin is honestly the only guy worth mentioning and we're not getting him anyway (how awesome would it be watching him play for OKC?).
Rubio is all Euro hype, he'll get destroyed by the bigger bodies of the NBA.
The other prospects are all PG's and I can honestly say that Devin is 10 times more talented than all of them, so we dont really need them.
Back in the off-season when all we were talking about was a top 3 pick I had some very high hopes for Derozan...........well...........that didnt go too well.
So yeah tanking for us makes no sense.
User avatar
Adam1221
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,600
And1: 397
Joined: Sep 12, 2007

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#24 » by Adam1221 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:01 am

NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.




:(
I was really waiting to get your opinion on it or to read some of your smart ass remarks.
Oh well good game, NJ baby that's how we do........Foget about it!
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#25 » by Da big3 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:15 am

NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.


dont worry Marbury didnt appear...
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#26 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:30 am

Adam1221 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I am starting to think this draft is not nearly as awful as people are making it out to be.

I remember last season people were saying the same thing before the tourneys started.

There are some really awesome prospects, just not too many big men after Griffin and if Monroe declares. I don't like Thabeet and he doesn't fit with us anyway and I am so-so on Hill, but he looks like he could be a really solid pro.

Then again, with the exception of point guards and about half a dozen other guys including Griffin, there might be a lot of really solid depth and not a lot of stars.


Well really now if you look at the impact prospects as in the guys that make loosing worth it, Griffin is honestly the only guy worth mentioning and we're not getting him anyway (how awesome would it be watching him play for OKC?).
Rubio is all Euro hype, he'll get destroyed by the bigger bodies of the NBA.
The other prospects are all PG's and I can honestly say that Devin is 10 times more talented than all of them, so we dont really need them.
Back in the off-season when all we were talking about was a top 3 pick I had some very high hopes for Derozan...........well...........that didnt go too well.
So yeah tanking for us makes no sense.

Rubio probably isn't declaring this year anyway and he is certainly not all Euro hype, plus he would go top 3 anyway.
Harden, Evan Turner, Greg Monroe, Terrence Williams are all very serious prospects.
Jordan Hill, Craig Brackins, Al-Fariq Amuni and even James Johnson are no joke either.
I am not a fan of tanking, I just keep saying we better get our $hit together and make a TRUE run for the playoffs or we might miss the player we want by one or two picks.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#27 » by NetsForce » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:45 am

Adam1221 wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.




:(
I was really waiting to get your opinion on it or to read some of your smart ass remarks.
Oh well good game, NJ baby that's how we do........Foget about it!


I know man I got stuck at this community dinner thing with a bunch of middle schoolers (don't ask). It was pretty wack, food was decent, but it wasn't a good use of my time.

If you want a laugh go to the Knicks board though they're in full escapegoat mode.
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#28 » by Da big3 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:56 am

NetsForce wrote:
Adam1221 wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.




:(
I was really waiting to get your opinion on it or to read some of your smart ass remarks.
Oh well good game, NJ baby that's how we do........Foget about it!


I know man I got stuck at this community dinner thing with a bunch of middle schoolers (don't ask). It was pretty wack, food was decent, but it wasn't a good use of my time.

If you want a laugh go to the Knicks board though they're in full escapegoat mode.


damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...
User avatar
60cent
Pro Prospect
Posts: 825
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Location: St. Andrews's Field

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#29 » by 60cent » Mon Mar 9, 2009 2:07 am

I like the win but where was Yi? I thought he played decent tonight but he was missing most of the 2nd half.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#30 » by NetsForce » Mon Mar 9, 2009 3:46 am

Da big3 wrote:damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...


I'm not really sure... One Knicks fan made an offensive post about Nets fans so I made a post that went something like this:

"Though the Nets might not have the most fans in the league they do have passionate fans who don't flip-flop on players every day or constantly create scapegoats for organizational failures."

More than anything else I think some of the posters on the Knicks board don't like the fact that I'm a Marbury fan and told them the day they acquired Hughes that they would regret it.
tigerman
Senior
Posts: 586
And1: 20
Joined: Dec 08, 2008

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#31 » by tigerman » Mon Mar 9, 2009 4:24 am

Nice to know that Vince, at 32 and with all the injuries, can still perform a windmill dunk. Its been a while VC. :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nUU26KXf6A
VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#32 » by VCRJKidd15 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 4:59 am

NetsForce wrote:
Da big3 wrote:damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...


I'm not really sure... One Knicks fan made an offensive post about Nets fans so I made a post that went something like this:

"Though the Nets might not have the most fans in the league they do have passionate fans who don't flip-flop on players every day or constantly create scapegoats for organizational failures."

More than anything else I think some of the posters on the Knicks board don't like the fact that I'm a Marbury fan and told them the day they acquired Hughes that they would regret it.
like my post that got deleted in the Knicks board. THEY MAD. Of course its okay when they come to our board and talk trash like Duhon is better then Harris but when we go over there its a sin.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,064
And1: 3,840
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#33 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Mar 9, 2009 8:06 am

^^^^They deleted my post as well.
I quoted the one guy that said something along the lines that NJ fans aren't good enough to be NY fans and said, "Your creativity is captivating".
Sore loser, fair weather fans they are. They're probably the same ones that showed up in droves for the 1st 3 years of the Jason Kidd era and then disapeared as soon as the slightest bit of turbulence started and they got their "savoirs" Marbury and Zeke.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
S.I.C. GM
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 31, 2002

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#34 » by S.I.C. GM » Mon Mar 9, 2009 1:38 pm

NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.


You didnt miss much. It was the same old thing.

Frank's rotations suck. Lopez pick and rolls. yada yada yada.

Thank God they won this game. I dont think I would be able to take the damn Knicks fans at my job this morning.
SIC
User avatar
Adam1221
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,600
And1: 397
Joined: Sep 12, 2007

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#35 » by Adam1221 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 4:25 pm

NetsForce wrote:
Da big3 wrote:damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...


I'm not really sure... One Knicks fan made an offensive post about Nets fans so I made a post that went something like this:

"Though the Nets might not have the most fans in the league they do have passionate fans who don't flip-flop on players every day or constantly create scapegoats for organizational failures."

More than anything else I think some of the posters on the Knicks board don't like the fact that I'm a Marbury fan and told them the day they acquired Hughes that they would regret it.


S.I.C. GM wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.


You didnt miss much. It was the same old thing.

Frank's rotations suck. Lopez pick and rolls. yada yada yada.

Thank God they won this game. I dont think I would be able to take the damn Knicks fans at my job this morning.



LOL 2 epic posts.
SteveNets15
Starter
Posts: 2,335
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Location: NJNETS

Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 106 Knicks 101 Final 

Post#36 » by SteveNets15 » Mon Mar 9, 2009 5:32 pm

Devin destroyed Duhan.Sean was a beast with 4 blocks giving Lee a hard time.Swat is back!!!! He deserves more minutes late in games next to Brook.KD played good D on Nate.Anybody hear anything about Carter's knee?
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#37 » by jerseyjac » Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:19 am

S.I.C. GM wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.


You didnt miss much. It was the same old thing.

Frank's rotations suck. Lopez pick and rolls. yada yada yada.

Thank God they won this game. I dont think I would be able to take the damn Knicks fans at my job this morning.


I thought it was a fun game...your almost forced to play D'Antoni ball...I think we wanted to stay close and just find enough stops in the 4th to close them out...

What do you want to see with the rotations?

and as far as the pick and rolls...they're getting better, I like to see more post ups...and I thought we got more than our avg. vs the Knicks w. Lopez on the blocks...
User avatar
livintoolive
Head Coach
Posts: 6,971
And1: 173
Joined: Aug 07, 2004

Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101 

Post#38 » by livintoolive » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:08 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:^^^^They deleted my post as well.
I quoted the one guy that said something along the lines that NJ fans aren't good enough to be NY fans and said, "Your creativity is captivating".
Sore loser, fair weather fans they are. They're probably the same ones that showed up in droves for the 1st 3 years of the Jason Kidd era and then disapeared as soon as the slightest bit of turbulence started and they got their "savoirs" Marbury and Zeke.



I don't think it's fair to generalize knicks fans like that. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to generalize nets fans through Netsforce's representation on the Knicks board (which is staunchly different from his representation of himself on the Nets board).

And to be frank, through that logic, wouldn't those fair weather fans not be Knicks fans right now?
R-DAWG wrote:i'd rather have the pick to package with Amare's contract next offseason, but hey, I'm just an MBA student at NYU what do I know about business.

Return to Brooklyn Nets