Official Game Thread: Nets 106 Knicks 101 Final
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,864
- And1: 176
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
- Contact:
-
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
lmao @ gallo missin that finger roll
damn that wilson chandler dunk was sick
and im so glad VC put down a windmill, its been a while.
damn that wilson chandler dunk was sick
and im so glad VC put down a windmill, its been a while.
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,711
- And1: 29
- Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- Adam1221
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,600
- And1: 397
- Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
vincecarter4pres wrote:I am starting to think this draft is not nearly as awful as people are making it out to be.
I remember last season people were saying the same thing before the tourneys started.
There are some really awesome prospects, just not too many big men after Griffin and if Monroe declares. I don't like Thabeet and he doesn't fit with us anyway and I am so-so on Hill, but he looks like he could be a really solid pro.
Then again, with the exception of point guards and about half a dozen other guys including Griffin, there might be a lot of really solid depth and not a lot of stars.
Well really now if you look at the impact prospects as in the guys that make loosing worth it, Griffin is honestly the only guy worth mentioning and we're not getting him anyway (how awesome would it be watching him play for OKC?).
Rubio is all Euro hype, he'll get destroyed by the bigger bodies of the NBA.
The other prospects are all PG's and I can honestly say that Devin is 10 times more talented than all of them, so we dont really need them.
Back in the off-season when all we were talking about was a top 3 pick I had some very high hopes for Derozan...........well...........that didnt go too well.
So yeah tanking for us makes no sense.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- Adam1221
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,600
- And1: 397
- Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.

I was really waiting to get your opinion on it or to read some of your smart ass remarks.
Oh well good game, NJ baby that's how we do........Foget about it!
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- Da big3
- Starter
- Posts: 2,405
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007
- Location: #hellobrooklyn
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
dont worry Marbury didnt appear...
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
Adam1221 wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:I am starting to think this draft is not nearly as awful as people are making it out to be.
I remember last season people were saying the same thing before the tourneys started.
There are some really awesome prospects, just not too many big men after Griffin and if Monroe declares. I don't like Thabeet and he doesn't fit with us anyway and I am so-so on Hill, but he looks like he could be a really solid pro.
Then again, with the exception of point guards and about half a dozen other guys including Griffin, there might be a lot of really solid depth and not a lot of stars.
Well really now if you look at the impact prospects as in the guys that make loosing worth it, Griffin is honestly the only guy worth mentioning and we're not getting him anyway (how awesome would it be watching him play for OKC?).
Rubio is all Euro hype, he'll get destroyed by the bigger bodies of the NBA.
The other prospects are all PG's and I can honestly say that Devin is 10 times more talented than all of them, so we dont really need them.
Back in the off-season when all we were talking about was a top 3 pick I had some very high hopes for Derozan...........well...........that didnt go too well.
So yeah tanking for us makes no sense.
Rubio probably isn't declaring this year anyway and he is certainly not all Euro hype, plus he would go top 3 anyway.
Harden, Evan Turner, Greg Monroe, Terrence Williams are all very serious prospects.
Jordan Hill, Craig Brackins, Al-Fariq Amuni and even James Johnson are no joke either.
I am not a fan of tanking, I just keep saying we better get our $hit together and make a TRUE run for the playoffs or we might miss the player we want by one or two picks.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,711
- And1: 29
- Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
Adam1221 wrote:NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
I was really waiting to get your opinion on it or to read some of your smart ass remarks.
Oh well good game, NJ baby that's how we do........Foget about it!
I know man I got stuck at this community dinner thing with a bunch of middle schoolers (don't ask). It was pretty wack, food was decent, but it wasn't a good use of my time.
If you want a laugh go to the Knicks board though they're in full escapegoat mode.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- Da big3
- Starter
- Posts: 2,405
- And1: 2
- Joined: Nov 29, 2007
- Location: #hellobrooklyn
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
NetsForce wrote:Adam1221 wrote:NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
I was really waiting to get your opinion on it or to read some of your smart ass remarks.
Oh well good game, NJ baby that's how we do........Foget about it!
I know man I got stuck at this community dinner thing with a bunch of middle schoolers (don't ask). It was pretty wack, food was decent, but it wasn't a good use of my time.
If you want a laugh go to the Knicks board though they're in full escapegoat mode.
damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- 60cent
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 825
- And1: 47
- Joined: Dec 07, 2005
- Location: St. Andrews's Field
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
I like the win but where was Yi? I thought he played decent tonight but he was missing most of the 2nd half.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,711
- And1: 29
- Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
Da big3 wrote:damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...
I'm not really sure... One Knicks fan made an offensive post about Nets fans so I made a post that went something like this:
"Though the Nets might not have the most fans in the league they do have passionate fans who don't flip-flop on players every day or constantly create scapegoats for organizational failures."
More than anything else I think some of the posters on the Knicks board don't like the fact that I'm a Marbury fan and told them the day they acquired Hughes that they would regret it.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Senior
- Posts: 586
- And1: 20
- Joined: Dec 08, 2008
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
Nice to know that Vince, at 32 and with all the injuries, can still perform a windmill dunk. Its been a while VC. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nUU26KXf6A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nUU26KXf6A
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,293
- And1: 128
- Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
like my post that got deleted in the Knicks board. THEY MAD. Of course its okay when they come to our board and talk trash like Duhon is better then Harris but when we go over there its a sin.NetsForce wrote:Da big3 wrote:damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...
I'm not really sure... One Knicks fan made an offensive post about Nets fans so I made a post that went something like this:
"Though the Nets might not have the most fans in the league they do have passionate fans who don't flip-flop on players every day or constantly create scapegoats for organizational failures."
More than anything else I think some of the posters on the Knicks board don't like the fact that I'm a Marbury fan and told them the day they acquired Hughes that they would regret it.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- vincecarter4pres
- RealGM
- Posts: 51,064
- And1: 3,840
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: New Jeruz
- Contact:
-
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
^^^^They deleted my post as well.
I quoted the one guy that said something along the lines that NJ fans aren't good enough to be NY fans and said, "Your creativity is captivating".
Sore loser, fair weather fans they are. They're probably the same ones that showed up in droves for the 1st 3 years of the Jason Kidd era and then disapeared as soon as the slightest bit of turbulence started and they got their "savoirs" Marbury and Zeke.
I quoted the one guy that said something along the lines that NJ fans aren't good enough to be NY fans and said, "Your creativity is captivating".
Sore loser, fair weather fans they are. They're probably the same ones that showed up in droves for the 1st 3 years of the Jason Kidd era and then disapeared as soon as the slightest bit of turbulence started and they got their "savoirs" Marbury and Zeke.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,939
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 31, 2002
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
You didnt miss much. It was the same old thing.
Frank's rotations suck. Lopez pick and rolls. yada yada yada.
Thank God they won this game. I dont think I would be able to take the damn Knicks fans at my job this morning.
SIC
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- Adam1221
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,600
- And1: 397
- Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
NetsForce wrote:Da big3 wrote:damm, netsforce whatd u get a warning for?...
I'm not really sure... One Knicks fan made an offensive post about Nets fans so I made a post that went something like this:
"Though the Nets might not have the most fans in the league they do have passionate fans who don't flip-flop on players every day or constantly create scapegoats for organizational failures."
More than anything else I think some of the posters on the Knicks board don't like the fact that I'm a Marbury fan and told them the day they acquired Hughes that they would regret it.
S.I.C. GM wrote:NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
You didnt miss much. It was the same old thing.
Frank's rotations suck. Lopez pick and rolls. yada yada yada.
Thank God they won this game. I dont think I would be able to take the damn Knicks fans at my job this morning.
LOL 2 epic posts.
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 106 Knicks 101 Final
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,335
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jan 25, 2008
- Location: NJNETS
Re: Official Game Thread: Nets 106 Knicks 101 Final
Devin destroyed Duhan.Sean was a beast with 4 blocks giving Lee a hard time.Swat is back!!!! He deserves more minutes late in games next to Brook.KD played good D on Nate.Anybody hear anything about Carter's knee?
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- jerseyjac
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,956
- And1: 34
- Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
S.I.C. GM wrote:NetsForce wrote:Damn I was so pumped for this game but missed the whole thing.
You didnt miss much. It was the same old thing.
Frank's rotations suck. Lopez pick and rolls. yada yada yada.
Thank God they won this game. I dont think I would be able to take the damn Knicks fans at my job this morning.
I thought it was a fun game...your almost forced to play D'Antoni ball...I think we wanted to stay close and just find enough stops in the 4th to close them out...
What do you want to see with the rotations?
and as far as the pick and rolls...they're getting better, I like to see more post ups...and I thought we got more than our avg. vs the Knicks w. Lopez on the blocks...
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
- livintoolive
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,971
- And1: 173
- Joined: Aug 07, 2004
Re: Domination night: Nets 106 Knicks 101
vincecarter4pres wrote:^^^^They deleted my post as well.
I quoted the one guy that said something along the lines that NJ fans aren't good enough to be NY fans and said, "Your creativity is captivating".
Sore loser, fair weather fans they are. They're probably the same ones that showed up in droves for the 1st 3 years of the Jason Kidd era and then disapeared as soon as the slightest bit of turbulence started and they got their "savoirs" Marbury and Zeke.
I don't think it's fair to generalize knicks fans like that. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to generalize nets fans through Netsforce's representation on the Knicks board (which is staunchly different from his representation of himself on the Nets board).
And to be frank, through that logic, wouldn't those fair weather fans not be Knicks fans right now?
R-DAWG wrote:i'd rather have the pick to package with Amare's contract next offseason, but hey, I'm just an MBA student at NYU what do I know about business.