SixSevenShooter wrote: 1) Once again your wrong so you switched up your whole arguement. So wait.. you believe that your either a title contending team or a 3-39284 team? Sorry we aren't one of the 4 teams in a 30 team league with a record to say we are going for the title... learn the game man what do you want me to say here? You sound like you haven't touched a basketball in your life.
No, when did I ever say that being "3-39284" is the way to go? I'm saying that, unless you're a true title contender, then making the playoffs really doesn't help. There are some exceptions to this, of course, such as a young team that has room to grow making the playoffs and exiting in the first round. That's not the Raptors though: they have experienced players, already have playoff experience for the most part, and no cap space in the future, so being in the playoffs could actually hurt them. They could strike lightning and make it to the finals, but I don't see that happening. You might, but I don't.
2) How is what I said about hoping for a lotto pick not true? You said "at least we got a chance at first pick" and yes, you do.. a small ass chance that going from past lotto's won't happen for you.. Which means your putting your hope on something so slim to happen that its pathetic to use against me in an argument.
I said we also have a chance at the first pick. Not at least. Now, I know that might seem like a non-factor to most, but it completely changes the meaning of the sentence. With the also being there, it means that it's a continuation of me admitting the fact that the Nets could potentially be the worst team ever, hence me agreeing with you that the team sucks. A small ass chance? There is a 25% chance of getting the first pick, no higher or lower. So, regardless of prior history, that percentage does not move.
3) I knew your uneducated ass couldn't comprehend a sentence. Where did you see me once say I'm not soft because I play basketball? It's called a period.. I assumed your mind would know that means I'm starting a new thought... lol "I'm not soft like most raptor fans. (PERIOD) I play organized basketball so I know the game like the back of my hand" ... that really so hard to understand?
When one person continues on writing after making a statement of fact, without there being a pause or a break, it construes to the reader that the writer intends for the reader for him or her to make an inference. In this case, I made an inference that you were saying you weren't soft because you played organized ball. If I made an improrper inference it's because you implied something, not because I'm an "uneducated ass."
Wanna keep going? because this took me literally 3 minutes to type up with how stupid your arguments are.
I'm not arguing anything. When did I say that the Nets were better than the Raptors? When did I say that the Nets would win? When did I speak ill of the Raptors? Honestly, you're trying to put down the wrong person.
You can answer, if you want, but there's no point. The Raptors won in a great fashion, be happy with that. Either way, I'm done in this thread since the games over and I've said my piece.