Lebron to the Mavs

Revolutionistt · Post #1 » by **Revolutionistt** » Thu May 20, 2010 7:02 pm

Hilarious, this is insane I wish every offseason were like this.

http://www.lebrontothemavs.com/

Jersey Generals · Post #2 » by **Jersey Generals** » Thu May 20, 2010 7:16 pm

That DUST chip has a lot of clout, eh? hahaha.

Preludepunk27 · Post #3 » by **Preludepunk27** » Thu May 20, 2010 7:42 pm

Do they have the space or would they have to do an S&T?

Who would they give up? They have some decent players, but I think their young guys are all overrated and they have a much smaller window to work with in my opinion.

vincecarter4pres · Post #4 » by **vincecarter4pres** » Thu May 20, 2010 7:47 pm

It's not out of the question. They could send Beaubois(really nice prospect) and a future 1st or two, along with eat one of Clevelands bad contracts for an expiring. It's more then Cleveland will get from anyone else.

Jersey Generals · Post #5 » by **Jersey Generals** » Thu May 20, 2010 8:03 pm

Preludepunk27 wrote:Do they have the space or would they have to do an S&T?

Who would they give up? They have some decent players, but I think their young guys are all overrated and they have a much smaller window to work with in my opinion.

It would be a sign and trade, using the DUST chip plus whatever else they want/need.

DUST chip: Dampier's expiring.

TheNetsFan · Post #6 » by **TheNetsFan** » Thu May 20, 2010 8:46 pm

Dampier's contract isn't guaranteed. So basically, he'd be released as soon as he got to Cleveland. Cleveland would have to be really enticed to help James leave.

With Dampier's contract, Dallas is more likely to be able to get a decent player whose salary a team wants to dump than a superstar. Think Kirilenko, Okafor/West, Harris (had we landed Wall), Iguodala, etc.

deviljets7 · Post #7 » by **deviljets7** » Thu May 20, 2010 11:52 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:It's not out of the question. They could send Beaubois(really nice prospect) and a future 1st or two, along with eat one of Clevelands bad contracts for an expiring. It's more then Cleveland will get from anyone else.

Any LeBron to Dallas trade (which is remote as it is) I think would require a third team to take Dampier and "borrow" their cap space. A $15+ million TPE certainly has value and a straight trade with the Mavs prevents CLE from getting one.

vincecarter4pres · Post #8 » by **vincecarter4pres** » Fri May 21, 2010 6:04 am

deviljets7 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:It's not out of the question. They could send Beaubois(really nice prospect) and a future 1st or two, along with eat one of Clevelands bad contracts for an expiring. It's more then Cleveland will get from anyone else.

Any LeBron to Dallas trade (which is remote as it is) I think would require a third team to take Dampier and "borrow" their cap space. A $15+ million TPE certainly has value and a straight trade with the Mavs prevents CLE from getting one.

Never thought about that, but then you have to send that team some sort of asset, lowering the tangible return for Cleveland.

I don't know, I don't think they would even care that much about a TPE if they could get Beaubois, a future 1st(s) and either Jamison, Mo or Side Show off there books a couple years early.

deviljets7 · Post #9 » by **deviljets7** » Sun May 23, 2010 9:11 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:
deviljets7 wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:It's not out of the question. They could send Beaubois(really nice prospect) and a future 1st or two, along with eat one of Clevelands bad contracts for an expiring. It's more then Cleveland will get from anyone else.

Any LeBron to Dallas trade (which is remote as it is) I think would require a third team to take Dampier and "borrow" their cap space. A $15+ million TPE certainly has value and a straight trade with the Mavs prevents CLE from getting one.

Never thought about that, but then you have to send that team some sort of asset, lowering the tangible return for Cleveland.

I don't know, I don't think they would even care that much about a TPE if they could get Beaubois, a future 1st(s) and either Jamison, Mo or Side Show off there books a couple years early.

The question with the TPE comes down to how open the wallet is without LeBron. Obviously it's been wide open with LeBron in town, but just how much lower does it get without him?

Having that large TPE can certainly allow them to bring in a much-needed infusion of youth and/or allow them to take money now to cut years on contracts (Think the Najera for Humphries/Shawne deal, but on a much bigger scale).