Paradise wrote:Prokorov wrote:Paradise wrote:Lol Reggie is not better than Deron. He simply was a long term option considering Deron's health. Deron is still very good when he plays well. It's a fact.
lol who isnt good when they play well?
the problem with dwill is him playing well isnt something that happens regularly. not sure how THIS YEAR you can say dwill is better then reggie.
I'm not saying Jackson is some star, but he is better... Deron williams is scoring 13 points a game on 39% FG and 50TS%. he has been pretty putrid.
Pre-All Star Break:
Deron: 39% FG / 36% 3pt / 50.8 TS% / 102.7 OffRTG / Points Created Per Assists: 14.3
Jackson: 43% FG / 27% 3pt / 51.1 TS% / 102.9 OffRTG / Points Created Per Assists: 9.3
Post-All Star Break:
Deron: 42% FG / 34.8% 3pt / 50.3 TS% / 107.3 OffRTG
Jackson: 33% FG/ 23% 3pt / 42.3 TS% / 97.7 OffRTG
Both aren't setting the world on fire but I'd take take Deron over him. Jackson has also been labeled a massive locker room cancer. I was a big supporter of getting Jackson for obvious reasons but we would be 0-6 with him right now leading this team.
posting post all star break numbers for 5 games is irrelevant and misleading, especially when one guy changed teams.
to say we would be 0-6 with reggie is idiotic. we might be 5-1 or 6-0. you dont know how he would fit in. Cancer? he never got into off court trouble and his only complaint was role as he was stuck behind a superstar. same could have been said for drazen petrovic. Deron hasnt exactly been a model of a team guy himself constantly showing up out of shape, being a diva and sulking
if you want dwill over jackson thats one thing... but to say jackson hasnt been as good or better is just inaccurate.
plus, we would have BOTH on the roster if we made the deal