GT: Nets @ Lakers - March 1st 10:30pm

Paradise · Post #21 » by **Paradise** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:57 am

Sloan has three shooters on the floor wide open on a fast break and he decides to take a contested layup which gets blocked by Bass

I'm sick and tired of watching these dumbass point guards. I could accept being a bad defender but a smart PG
somehow we have a collection of point guards that can't score, defend or think.

Paradise · Post #22 » by **Paradise** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 6:11 am

MrDollarBills wrote:I'd like to see Kilpatrick given more minutes and also some encouragement to be aggressive on offense. He's not trying to disrupt the flow but at the same time, I want to see him attack.

8 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist on 3/8 FG, 2/4 3PT in 21 minutes.

He got blocked a few times but I thought he was solid out there despite the mistakes. He definitely has a beautiful shot and quick release. I would've liked him to get more shot attempts. He was wide open a few times and Sloan/Larkin froze him out. He's a little slow footed defensively, though.

MrDollarBills · Post #23 » by **MrDollarBills** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 12:12 pm

DarkXaero wrote:The refs fouling out Brook killed the game off. Brook was starting to take over and getting touches on almost every possession to good effect.

You have to love how Brook is the #1 priority on offense and is responding to it.

I knew were we going to lose with the way Russel was lighting up our garbage ass PGs and just a lot of dumb mistakes from both of them. We need competent PG play in here badly.

Either way, win or lose we have to take away positives here. Bojan has quietly been putting together some good games since Joe's departure.

isekii · Post #24 » by **isekii** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 12:20 pm

If we hit all our free throws the game should have been won. But a lot of bone headed moves towards the end of the game for sure.

Keith Van Horn · Post #25 » by **Keith Van Horn** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 1:52 pm

games are too late for me

Post #26 » by **CalamityX12** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 2:17 pm

we lost to these sorry ass lakers twice?

LOL

isekii · Post #27 » by **isekii** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 3:01 pm

CalamityX12 wrote:we lost to these sorry ass lakers twice?

LOL

Guess they're not tanking after all

Prokorov · Post #28 » by **Prokorov** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 3:27 pm

Paradise wrote:How hard is it to keep ONE starter on the floor with these bench lineups? How hard is it?

pretty hard considering most of our starters are actually bench players :banghead:

2Mas · Post #29 » by **2Mas** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:16 pm

Paradise wrote:Sloan has three shooters on the floor wide open on a fast break and he decides to take a contested layup which gets blocked by Bass

I'm sick and tired of watching these dumbass point guards. I could accept being a bad defender but a smart PG
somehow we have a collection of point guards that can't score, defend or think.

How are you guys feeling about Sloan? Idky but I root for the guy. I don't even have any real ties to him.

Seems coming out of the break he's been more solid. Kinda settling into that 10-6-3-1 type games pretty consistently.

Thoughts & Opinions?

jbeachboy · Post #30 » by **jbeachboy** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:36 pm

2Mas wrote:
Paradise wrote:Sloan has three shooters on the floor wide open on a fast break and he decides to take a contested layup which gets blocked by Bass

I'm sick and tired of watching these dumbass point guards. I could accept being a bad defender but a smart PG
somehow we have a collection of point guards that can't score, defend or think.

How are you guys feeling about Sloan? Idky but I root for the guy. I don't even have any real ties to him.

Seems coming out of the break he's been more solid. Kinda settling into that 10-6-3-1 type games pretty consistently.

Thoughts & Opinions?

e

he is good but he isnt an nba starter , i rather have upgrade at starter. sloan isnt a good shooter.

isekii · Post #31 » by **isekii** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:40 pm

2Mas wrote:
Paradise wrote:Sloan has three shooters on the floor wide open on a fast break and he decides to take a contested layup which gets blocked by Bass

I'm sick and tired of watching these dumbass point guards. I could accept being a bad defender but a smart PG
somehow we have a collection of point guards that can't score, defend or think.

How are you guys feeling about Sloan? Idky but I root for the guy. I don't even have any real ties to him.

Seems coming out of the break he's been more solid. Kinda settling into that 10-6-3-1 type games pretty consistently.

Thoughts & Opinions?

He's several tiers higher than Larkin that's for sure. I like him as a backup.

Post #32 » by **NyCeEvO** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:50 pm

2Mas wrote:
Paradise wrote:Sloan has three shooters on the floor wide open on a fast break and he decides to take a contested layup which gets blocked by Bass

I'm sick and tired of watching these dumbass point guards. I could accept being a bad defender but a smart PG
somehow we have a collection of point guards that can't score, defend or think.

How are you guys feeling about Sloan? Idky but I root for the guy. I don't even have any real ties to him.

Seems coming out of the break he's been more solid. Kinda settling into that 10-6-3-1 type games pretty consistently.

Thoughts & Opinions?

Sloan is 2nd or 3rd string PG. Larkin belongs in the D-League, at best.

Post #33 » by **NyCeEvO** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 5:53 pm

Before the game, I definitely liked our chances. However, considering that 1) you have to pray during each possession that our PGs don't turn the ball over and 2) this was the 2nd night of a back-to-back, I'm not surprised by the result.

DarkXaero · Post #34 » by **DarkXaero** » Wed Mar 2, 2016 6:53 pm

Larkin isnt an NBA player. He must be in bottom 3 among all NBA PGs. Even with how bad Billy King was as a GM, i have no idea what he was thinking signing Larkin. You know a player is complete trash if you think that minimum level salary ($1.45 mill) is too much for him.

Sloan is a third string PG but he looks like a good starting PG in comparison to Larkin.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk