Prokorov wrote:can we cut with the "tony browns rotations are awful" as if there is any rotaiton that would result in us not being the laughing stock of the league? we heard the same thing under hollins. this team is made up of d-leaguers and F-tier players. even our best players arent all that consistent night to night.
brown has a pretty tough job. he has nothing at PG, rookies and dleaguers on the wings, nothing behind brook and thad up front.
Thank you. The criticism of Brown is over the top. If he was a world beater of a coach, he would've been scooped up a long time ago.
He's got us playing much better basketball offensively despite losing Jack and JJ. The ball movement is quite nice considering the lack of overall talent with the team.
His #1 priority is to get these young guys playing time. Sure, his rotations could be better but such decisions aren't going to turn us into a juggernaut.
Finally, the idea that certain things are "so obvious" is pretty ridiculous. I doubt many of the people criticizing Brown have coached before. We have the ability to sit back and watch a game. A coach has to manage personalities, minute distribution, and put plays in on the fly among other things. If you guys have ever tried coaching, you'll know how difficult it is.
Brown is doing better than Hollins and that's exactly what you want from an interim coach. Anything more than that is icing on the cake.