Net Sentence wrote:Ror1997 wrote:Net Sentence wrote:I love how this thread spiraled into people complaining about my agenda. Looks like I knew what I was talking about. It's was perfectly OK to do what I was doing when it was about Billy King but for some reason we have to use kid gloves when talking about Marks. Marks has completely and utterly failed in his first off-season. King did better last off-season on a cap strapped team simple by trading for RHJ.
Instead of overpaying guys in their prime like Bazemore who could actually make a decision then and there, Marks chose to try and overpay RFA agents who had zero control of their situation. That strategy would make a lot more sense if he didnt needlessly create a hole at PF. So while he was trying to play slick with the offers, he missed the entire PF market because he lost flexibility.
A novice would know that Bazemore is going to go back to Atlanta if all things were equal. Marks had to give him a reason to leave Atlanta, i.e. more money.
Now people dont realize the ramifications of what happens next. We still need to reach the salary floor so instead of overpaying a C+ talent like Bazemore, we are going to have to overspend on F tier guys now.
It's a god damn trainwreck. Marks was the wrong guy for the job.
How many times do you have to be told that Bazemore was offered 4/72 from Marks but took 4/70 from Atlanta?
If TJ and Crabbe were Nets at this moment, we wouldn't be saying Marks failed. He didn't ultimately have control over Miami and Portland matching. He made it as hard as he could for them to match. Tyler Johnson is getting 40 million over the last 2 years and has a player option for the 4th year. Crabbe has advanced payments. They both have trade kickers. He COULD control that, and he did an excellent job of negotiating BOTH those contracts. But 2 other teams had control over the situation, and you blame marks for 2 other GMs decisions? Cut the BS.
About as many time it take to tell you 500k per year isnt going to get a deal done. SMH
But they arent Nets at this moment and that is the reality of it. He failed. PERIOD. END OF STORY. This is Marks failure, and Marks failure alone. You dont trade Thad to clear out cap space unless you are absolutely certain about the guys you have earmarked for it. That is an extremely irresponsible and risky thing to do if it goes bad like it did and is just as bad as BK trading for KG and Pierce. There is no spin. There is no sugar coating it. There is no almost in sports. The only thing people will remember is the guys he actually ends up signing.
Wait, I'm confused. So you DID know that we offered More money than Atlanta, and that we were trying to over pay (70 mil is an overpay) but yet you went ahead and said we didn't anyway? Because it....fits your agenda?
You act like you're not doing petty things like that, and get upset when you get called out on it.
Also, you say marks failed because they aren't nets, but he wouldn't have failed if they were nets? Marks had no control over the final say. You're blaming Marks for something out of his control?
This is as bad as the worst move possibly in NBA history?
Can we ban NS already? For real, this is ridiculous. Obviously we're in for another rough year and we really don't need NS trying to twist everything into a reason Marks should be fired.