ImageImageImageImageImage

Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1141 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Aug 31, 2020 11:53 am

kamaze wrote:
Nycnyc7188 wrote:
brook wrote:
In my opinion, you overrate every player in the league, except Nets players.
We don't need a starting 4, there's KD already!

My thoughts exactly lmao u shouldve been around when they thought trading brook lopez for reggie jackson was a “sleeper trade” lmaooo thats when i stopped taking then serious let alone with the whole trade Caris LeVert for jruel holiday or seth curry Lmaoo .riducluous


I remember that one lol

Not me homie, was never a Reggie Jackson guy.

Was most certainly a trade Brook guy though, even though I was simultaneously a Lopez supporter.

Not sure how any of the trade Brook people were wrong though, or any of you Brook fanboys were vindicated? It took Brook till his third team being used on a roster of all NBA level defenders as a stretch 5 and finisher and 4th or 5th option to be actually successful, like most Brook supporters always pointed out was his proper fit and path to positive impact.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1142 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:06 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
ecuhus1981 wrote:It's true, Seth is one of the most lethal snipers in the game. However, I think there is still a way that we could pry him away from Dallas.

They are hoping to land a big 2021 free agent (*cough* Giannis *cough"), and they need to dump salary in order to open up Max cap space next summer. We have an opportunity 2 pounce on their cheap, efficient role players who are locked in long-term. It would cost us Dinwiddie and Temple, probably Allen would also have to be in the mix. But if we're getting back one of their Bigs, I would do the deal.

I’m with MDB, no way I’m giving up Allen for Kleber and Curry.

They want Allen we need to start talking Porzingis and we know that’s not happening.


Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.

There’s articles that say injecting bleach cures the coronavirus, just sayin’!

I think Allen has at least equal trade value to Caris league wide, yes.

And I think Allen has superior on court value to us and most teams in the league.

Using confirmation bias from an article’s title isn’t relevant to the conversation imho. In that same article 5 of the 9 spoken to said trade him and a couple even said he makes no sense here in relation to the current Brooklyn roster. Hell, 2 of the 4 who said keep him, also said then, that he should be the 6xth man, which is what I said if he is retained.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,843
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1143 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:18 pm

7footMONSTER wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:We need a wing defender at either the two or three spot. KD can play the 4 next to Jarrett Allen.


Agree. KD should play the 4. Allen should start but even if he doesn’t, he should get most of the minutes at C. Something like Allen 26 minutes, DJ 22 minutes.

Most teams just spam PnR or use off ball screens in the half court to create mismatches. Hiding Kyrie will be a problem. The SG he’s paired with has to have the size and length to guard 1-3 and be able to hit shots and make plays if Kyrie has to give it up.

LeVert, Dinwiddie, Harris, (TLC) can all play the 2, but is that the optimal lineup? Our roster is too tilted towards offense and not enough defense imo, especially when you factor in KD and Harris at the wings. The 2 spot is where we really need a defensive difference maker.

Josh Richardson fits the description for what we need, but it would mean having to trade Dinwiddie to get him.

I’d opt for Jrue, but I’m guessing you’re just going to tell me he’s a 5’11” shooting guard again. :lol:
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,595
And1: 16,132
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1144 » by therealbig3 » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:43 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:
ecuhus1981 wrote:It's true, Seth is one of the most lethal snipers in the game. However, I think there is still a way that we could pry him away from Dallas.

They are hoping to land a big 2021 free agent (*cough* Giannis *cough"), and they need to dump salary in order to open up Max cap space next summer. We have an opportunity 2 pounce on their cheap, efficient role players who are locked in long-term. It would cost us Dinwiddie and Temple, probably Allen would also have to be in the mix. But if we're getting back one of their Bigs, I would do the deal.

I’m with MDB, no way I’m giving up Allen for Kleber and Curry.

They want Allen we need to start talking Porzingis and we know that’s not happening.


Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.


I think Seth Curry has more on court value as a player than Caris Levert.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1145 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:23 pm

DarkXaero wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:Looks like you're only looking to troll here, because you quote my posts, but then ignore what actually answers your questions, and then you go off on a tangent. Warriors are the last team to do so, and that was only last season...

If you don't think we can accomplish that with KD, Kyrie, and Beal on the team, that's fine, you're free to believe that. Klay is the ultimate off ball star, but Beal is the superior scorer. There are maybe only a handful of guys that can average 30 in this league on above average efficiency. Beal is one of them. Again I didn't say that Beal would average 25 here but he can certainly get close to that. But feel free to ignore that part as well.

It doesn't matter what you or others say, and it doesn't matter whether we get Beal or not; his fit here is completely fine. He's a 27 year old elite scorer who has played plus defense in his career previously, and he knows how to play off ball. No contender has gotten worse in recent memory by adding legitimate stars to their existing all star core. No amount of you flaming my posts or insulting my intelligence is gonna change that.


Ok bro. You ignore my points and then accuse me of "trolling" instead of actually making a cogent argument :lol:

I just explained how most of these 3 team deals are not beneficial. The Ws are the lone exception because Klay is an elite off ball player & defender.

That's the only way it works. I would love to add Klay Thompson to KD & Kyrie. In fact, I would trade Levert and all other assets.

But when you add a player like Beal. It doesn't work as well. Love/Bosh became glorified spot up shooters.

Beal may be a better scorer. We don't need another scorer. Kyrie/KD are both elite scorers. No team needs 3 guys that can put up 25 ppg. Its a waste of money and assets to do that.

LOL you keep saying "close" to 25 PPG is doable when no one has ever done it. Is Klay's 22 PPG in 2017 really "close" to 25 PPG. 3 points is a lot over the course of a year. Especially considering a big reason Klay got there is because KD got injured for a long portion of the season. With a healthy KD he didn't get those numbers the nest 2 years.

In either case, Beal is not going to do something no one has ever done.

Beal has never been a great defender. If we are going to add a "third star" it would be someone who could play elite defense and play off ball. Beal will never be close to an elite defender. He can be below average at best.
I address everything you say, no matter how nonsensical it is, and I'm quite frankly tired of it. Don't make up bs by throwing in fancy terms to disguise what you're really doing.

Love was never that good of a player, and with Lebron & Kyrie gone, he still can't average 20 PPG. Bosh was a very good player in Toronto, but never an elite level scorer, which is fine as he was a PF. Bosh adjusted extremely well next to two high usage guys in Lebron & Wade, and still gave them close to 20 a game with high level defense and stretch big ability. So that big 3 absolutely worked, and no one has said otherwise. What you do have to explain to me is which big 3 in recent memory actually failed, because as far as I can see, they all won championships. Whether its the Celtics with KG, Pierce, and Ray Allen, or Miami Heatles or the Warriors (with or without KD). People had to sacrifice their numbers, but they achieved the end goal of winning championships. I personally wouldn't care if Beal averages 25 or 20 as a "glorified Jordan Clarkson", as long as we win a championship.

For the last time, last season, Klay averaged 21.7 PPG next to KD (26 PPG), and Steph Curry (27.3 PPG). That actually comes out to an average of 25 PPG for the top 3 scorers on the team. But go ahead, keep ignoring that. Again, Klay is an elite off ball player, but Beal is the more talented scorer, and can actually lead a unit (bench guys for example) by himself. Beal just finished 2nd to only James Harden in scoring. Klay has never averaged 25 a game in his life.

Beal has been an above average defender in his career so saying that he can only be "below average at best" is false. Is Beal going to be an elite defender? No. But evidence exists that he has been a solid defender for most of his NBA career, and its only this season where he had a dramatic drop on that end. And that coincides with previously explained factors, and there's no reason to believe that he can't get back to being a good defender with decreased workload, and more motivation (contending for a title as opposed to playing on a surefire lotto team).


Fancy BS terms??? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sorry you can't understand basic English bro.

Love was never that good of a player? Complete nonsense. He puts up just as good stats as Beal on a better Wolves team before getting traded.

In face, he made All NBA twice before getting traded, something Beal has never done.

He also made 3 All Star teams, compared to 2 for Beal. His final year he was putting up 26/13/4 on better efficiency that Beal lol.

Also Love's skills have diminished now so its a pretty dumb argument to compare him now to the player he was in Minnesota.

Bosh was good but did not come close to replicating his numbers in Toronto and basically played like a spot up shooter/role player. Miami would have been better served with high level role players.

There are plenty of Big 3s that did not work also. Kidd/Carter/Jefferson on our own team.

Celtics Big 3, had KG who was primarily a defensive player who even won DPOY. Something Beal is NOT.

As far as the 25 PPG argument, you're now completely changing your argument cause you know I'm right. 25 PPG average over 3 players? :lol:

You were originally trying to say Beal would average 25 PPG by himself or "close to it." An absurd claim which we both know is not true.

Klay could definitely average 25 PPG if he needed to be a high volume scorer. He just hasn't had to do that because hes far more valuable doing what he does. His efficiency is leagues and bounds better than Beal for a reason.

I don't know if Beal is an "above average" defender at some point in his career. He certainly is a terrible one now which is what matters. Certainly not the type of one that Klay or KG were.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1146 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:27 pm

DarkXaero wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’m with MDB, no way I’m giving up Allen for Kleber and Curry.

They want Allen we need to start talking Porzingis and we know that’s not happening.


Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.
Why can't Allen have more value in the league than Levert? He's way younger, still on his rookie deal, not injury prone, and has been a decent starting center in his young career with good upside. Levert has "potential third star" hype, because Levert is seen as a scoring guard, while Allen isn't a scorer.


Allen is not seen as a potential "third star" by other teams.

Scoring guards are more valuable in the league than rim running bigs who can't shoot.

Whether you like LeVert or not, he definitely has more value trade wise than Allen.

Allen has been very good but done nothing to show star potential.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1147 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:29 pm

MrDollarBills wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:The more I think about it, the more I feel we need to flip Allen for a defensive wing or shooter.

Hes just too good to be a backup C and were not going to be able to pay him next off season. I don't see him thriving as a backup for Jordan.


Why can't we pay Jarrett? The Nets would be making a critical error if they think DeAndre Jordan is going to be a reliable option at center for the length of his contract. The Allen we saw here during the restart was a stud. We need to keep him unless we are being offered a can't miss deal


KD and Kyrie have made it clear they want Jordan starting. Jackie McMullon's recent article stated this as well.

Allen is amazing but hes simply too good to be a backup C and we will not be able to pay him after this season.

I think we should sell high and acquire a really good 3 & D type player for him.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1148 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:34 pm

vincecarter4pres wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’m with MDB, no way I’m giving up Allen for Kleber and Curry.

They want Allen we need to start talking Porzingis and we know that’s not happening.


Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.

There’s articles that say injecting bleach cures the coronavirus, just sayin’!

I think Allen has at least equal trade value to Caris league wide, yes.

And I think Allen has superior on court value to us and most teams in the league.

Using confirmation bias from an article’s title isn’t relevant to the conversation imho. In that same article 5 of the 9 spoken to said trade him and a couple even said he makes no sense here in relation to the current Brooklyn roster. Hell, 2 of the 4 who said keep him, also said then, that he should be the 6xth man, which is what I said if he is retained.


LOL ok bro.

I think a sourced article is more reliable than some insane conspiracy theory. Pretty dumb comparison.

Its not "confirmation" bias there has been a ton of reporting about how Levert could be used as the center piece of a trade for another All Star. People are not talking that way about Allen. Sorry.

They said to trade him because of fit, not his value. Same with coming off the bench.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1149 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:34 pm

therealbig3 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
vincecarter4pres wrote:I’m with MDB, no way I’m giving up Allen for Kleber and Curry.

They want Allen we need to start talking Porzingis and we know that’s not happening.


Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.


I think Seth Curry has more on court value as a player than Caris Levert.


Complete and utter delusion. We just saw LeVert lead us to a winning record in the bubble while putting up over 26 PPG on good efficiency.

Curry couldn't do that in his sleep.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,595
And1: 16,132
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1150 » by therealbig3 » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:46 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.


I think Seth Curry has more on court value as a player than Caris Levert.


Complete and utter delusion. We just saw LeVert lead us to a winning record in the bubble while putting up over 26 PPG on good efficiency.

Curry couldn't do that in his sleep.


Curry can be a secondary ball handler and playmaker, and is one of the better 3 and D players in the league.

When Levert can prove he’s more than just an 8 game hot streak, I’ll take him over Curry. As it stands now, who would you rather have next to Kyrie and Durant? If it’s not Curry, based on what we’ve seen, then you need to re examine how you view basketball, because Curry would fit like a glove either on ball or off, and he gives us some defense in the back court that we’re in sore need of.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,595
And1: 16,132
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1151 » by therealbig3 » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:48 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.
Why can't Allen have more value in the league than Levert? He's way younger, still on his rookie deal, not injury prone, and has been a decent starting center in his young career with good upside. Levert has "potential third star" hype, because Levert is seen as a scoring guard, while Allen isn't a scorer.


Allen is not seen as a potential "third star" by other teams.

Scoring guards are more valuable in the league than rim running bigs who can't shoot.

Whether you like LeVert or not, he definitely has more value trade wise than Allen.

Allen has been very good but done nothing to show star potential.


Doesn’t need to score a lot of points to be a star big man, especially nowadays. A big that can play elite defense, crash the glass, and finish around the rim at an elite level has star potential, and you’re just not being honest if you’re saying Allen hasn’t shown that.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,031
And1: 11,974
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1152 » by Paradise » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:03 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
MrDollarBills wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:The more I think about it, the more I feel we need to flip Allen for a defensive wing or shooter.

Hes just too good to be a backup C and were not going to be able to pay him next off season. I don't see him thriving as a backup for Jordan.


Why can't we pay Jarrett? The Nets would be making a critical error if they think DeAndre Jordan is going to be a reliable option at center for the length of his contract. The Allen we saw here during the restart was a stud. We need to keep him unless we are being offered a can't miss deal


KD and Kyrie have made it clear they want Jordan starting. Jackie McMullon's recent article stated this as well.

Allen is amazing but hes simply too good to be a backup C and we will not be able to pay him after this season.

I think we should sell high and acquire a really good 3 & D type player for him.

There’s really no rush. However, I’d look at a swap for Covington if Houston moves on from D’antoni. I’m not dealing Allen for anyone less.
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,225
And1: 5,767
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1153 » by DarkXaero » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:41 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
Ok bro. You ignore my points and then accuse me of "trolling" instead of actually making a cogent argument :lol:

I just explained how most of these 3 team deals are not beneficial. The Ws are the lone exception because Klay is an elite off ball player & defender.

That's the only way it works. I would love to add Klay Thompson to KD & Kyrie. In fact, I would trade Levert and all other assets.

But when you add a player like Beal. It doesn't work as well. Love/Bosh became glorified spot up shooters.

Beal may be a better scorer. We don't need another scorer. Kyrie/KD are both elite scorers. No team needs 3 guys that can put up 25 ppg. Its a waste of money and assets to do that.

LOL you keep saying "close" to 25 PPG is doable when no one has ever done it. Is Klay's 22 PPG in 2017 really "close" to 25 PPG. 3 points is a lot over the course of a year. Especially considering a big reason Klay got there is because KD got injured for a long portion of the season. With a healthy KD he didn't get those numbers the nest 2 years.

In either case, Beal is not going to do something no one has ever done.

Beal has never been a great defender. If we are going to add a "third star" it would be someone who could play elite defense and play off ball. Beal will never be close to an elite defender. He can be below average at best.
I address everything you say, no matter how nonsensical it is, and I'm quite frankly tired of it. Don't make up bs by throwing in fancy terms to disguise what you're really doing.

Love was never that good of a player, and with Lebron & Kyrie gone, he still can't average 20 PPG. Bosh was a very good player in Toronto, but never an elite level scorer, which is fine as he was a PF. Bosh adjusted extremely well next to two high usage guys in Lebron & Wade, and still gave them close to 20 a game with high level defense and stretch big ability. So that big 3 absolutely worked, and no one has said otherwise. What you do have to explain to me is which big 3 in recent memory actually failed, because as far as I can see, they all won championships. Whether its the Celtics with KG, Pierce, and Ray Allen, or Miami Heatles or the Warriors (with or without KD). People had to sacrifice their numbers, but they achieved the end goal of winning championships. I personally wouldn't care if Beal averages 25 or 20 as a "glorified Jordan Clarkson", as long as we win a championship.

For the last time, last season, Klay averaged 21.7 PPG next to KD (26 PPG), and Steph Curry (27.3 PPG). That actually comes out to an average of 25 PPG for the top 3 scorers on the team. But go ahead, keep ignoring that. Again, Klay is an elite off ball player, but Beal is the more talented scorer, and can actually lead a unit (bench guys for example) by himself. Beal just finished 2nd to only James Harden in scoring. Klay has never averaged 25 a game in his life.

Beal has been an above average defender in his career so saying that he can only be "below average at best" is false. Is Beal going to be an elite defender? No. But evidence exists that he has been a solid defender for most of his NBA career, and its only this season where he had a dramatic drop on that end. And that coincides with previously explained factors, and there's no reason to believe that he can't get back to being a good defender with decreased workload, and more motivation (contending for a title as opposed to playing on a surefire lotto team).


Fancy BS terms??? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Sorry you can't understand basic English bro.

Love was never that good of a player? Complete nonsense. He puts up just as good stats as Beal on a better Wolves team before getting traded.

In face, he made All NBA twice before getting traded, something Beal has never done.

He also made 3 All Star teams, compared to 2 for Beal. His final year he was putting up 26/13/4 on better efficiency that Beal lol.

Also Love's skills have diminished now so its a pretty dumb argument to compare him now to the player he was in Minnesota.

Bosh was good but did not come close to replicating his numbers in Toronto and basically played like a spot up shooter/role player. Miami would have been better served with high level role players.

There are plenty of Big 3s that did not work also. Kidd/Carter/Jefferson on our own team.

Celtics Big 3, had KG who was primarily a defensive player who even won DPOY. Something Beal is NOT.

As far as the 25 PPG argument, you're now completely changing your argument cause you know I'm right. 25 PPG average over 3 players? :lol:

You were originally trying to say Beal would average 25 PPG by himself or "close to it." An absurd claim which we both know is not true.

Klay could definitely average 25 PPG if he needed to be a high volume scorer. He just hasn't had to do that because hes far more valuable doing what he does. His efficiency is leagues and bounds better than Beal for a reason.

I don't know if Beal is an "above average" defender at some point in his career. He certainly is a terrible one now which is what matters. Certainly not the type of one that Klay or KG were.
I can speak English fine, and I also know when someone is trying way too hard to sound smart.

Kevin Love was labeled as an empty stats player with the Wolves, and that assessment turned out to be correct. Kevin Love is/was a good player, but never as good as the numbers he put up on the Wolves. The difference is that Beal has been on playoffs teams from early in his career, and has played well in playoffs, so its not a question mark about him. And Beal has only gotten better since then.

I didn't change the argument, the point was to show that it is entirely possible to have 3 guys roughly averaging 25 PPG on one team. Math indicates that there are "enough shots to go around". Once again, I'm not surprised that you're unable to grasp basic logic there.

Klay's efficiency is also not "leagues and bounds better than Beal", that's just more bs by you. Matter of fact, Beal's 30 PPG had higher TS% than Klay's last season.

And you don't know if Beal was an above average defender at some point in his career? Either check the metrics for previous years and/or watch video evidence. The main reasons for his defense falling off are pretty obvious, as explained.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,922
And1: 1,588
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1154 » by ecuhus1981 » Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:35 pm

therealbig3 wrote:Curry can be a secondary ball handler and playmaker, and is one of the better 3 and D players in the league.

When Levert can prove he’s more than just an 8 game hot streak, I’ll take him over Curry. As it stands now, who would you rather have next to Kyrie and Durant? If it’s not Curry, based on what we’ve seen, then you need to re examine how you view basketball, because Curry would fit like a glove either on ball or off, and he gives us some defense in the back court that we’re in sore need of.

Show me a single metric that substantiates your claim that Seth Curry is a 3&D guy. He's got the 3 for sure, and I'd like to have him on our squad. By every statistical measure I've seen, he's one of the worst guard defenders in the league. Comparing his value to Caris is laughable.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1155 » by Prokorov » Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:53 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
Are you really under the illusion that Allen has more value in the league than Levert?

Theres even a hoopshype article calling him a potential "third star."

You don't trade that for two 8th men. No thanks.


I think Seth Curry has more on court value as a player than Caris Levert.


Complete and utter delusion. We just saw LeVert lead us to a winning record in the bubble while putting up over 26 PPG on good efficiency.

Curry couldn't do that in his sleep.


We were 5-7 in the bubble. how is that a winning record?

Curry as a non #1 option certainly has a case for more on-court value than levert. Levert wont be taking 18-20 shots and being a #1 or #2 option in the future.

Curry average 13 points on 45% from three for a dallas team that had 2 primary stars. He showed he could both star alongside them or provide bench scoring this year. With KD/Kyrie he is probably a much better fit.
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1156 » by Prokorov » Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:55 pm

ecuhus1981 wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:Curry can be a secondary ball handler and playmaker, and is one of the better 3 and D players in the league.

When Levert can prove he’s more than just an 8 game hot streak, I’ll take him over Curry. As it stands now, who would you rather have next to Kyrie and Durant? If it’s not Curry, based on what we’ve seen, then you need to re examine how you view basketball, because Curry would fit like a glove either on ball or off, and he gives us some defense in the back court that we’re in sore need of.

Show me a single metric that substantiates your claim that Seth Curry is a 3&D guy. He's got the 3 for sure, and I'd like to have him on our squad. By every statistical measure I've seen, he's one of the worst guard defenders in the league. Comparing his value to Caris is laughable.


Caris is for certain worse defensively. Curry isnt pat beverly, but he hold shis own on that end.

he is a better fit here, for certain
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,225
And1: 5,767
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1157 » by DarkXaero » Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:09 pm

I don't think Seth Curry is a 3&D guy at all. Excellent 3pt shooter for sure, and while he can hold his own on defense despite his limitations, he's far from good enough defensively to be classified as a "3&D" guy.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1158 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:18 pm

therealbig3 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:
I think Seth Curry has more on court value as a player than Caris Levert.


Complete and utter delusion. We just saw LeVert lead us to a winning record in the bubble while putting up over 26 PPG on good efficiency.

Curry couldn't do that in his sleep.


Curry can be a secondary ball handler and playmaker, and is one of the better 3 and D players in the league.

When Levert can prove he’s more than just an 8 game hot streak, I’ll take him over Curry. As it stands now, who would you rather have next to Kyrie and Durant? If it’s not Curry, based on what we’ve seen, then you need to re examine how you view basketball, because Curry would fit like a glove either on ball or off, and he gives us some defense in the back court that we’re in sore need of.


LOL a 3 & D player?

You seriously think Curry can guard some of the elite guards in this league?

Hes a good shooter. Nothing more than an 8th man on a good team.

Worse version of Joe Harris, who we already are probably starting.

Of course I would rather have Levert! Its not even a question.
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,225
And1: 5,767
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1159 » by DarkXaero » Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:21 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=20

I could see us considering this move.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: Nets Going Forward: Planning for Next Season 

Post#1160 » by Hello Brooklyn » Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:21 pm

therealbig3 wrote:
Hello Brooklyn wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:Why can't Allen have more value in the league than Levert? He's way younger, still on his rookie deal, not injury prone, and has been a decent starting center in his young career with good upside. Levert has "potential third star" hype, because Levert is seen as a scoring guard, while Allen isn't a scorer.


Allen is not seen as a potential "third star" by other teams.

Scoring guards are more valuable in the league than rim running bigs who can't shoot.

Whether you like LeVert or not, he definitely has more value trade wise than Allen.

Allen has been very good but done nothing to show star potential.


Doesn’t need to score a lot of points to be a star big man, especially nowadays. A big that can play elite defense, crash the glass, and finish around the rim at an elite level has star potential, and you’re just not being honest if you’re saying Allen hasn’t shown that.


Allen cannot play elite defense. Thats ridiculous lol.

He got absolutely bodied by Embiid last year. Not saying hes bad, but he is not a great rim protector yet.

Return to Brooklyn Nets