Mkdaman1818 wrote:I'm really hoping this is a smoke screen or a ploy for Calipari to negotiate.
How would this be a ploy for Calipari to negotiate?
He's got a great job. It's not like he would be losing out on a tremendous opportunity if he doesn't come to the Nets. If the Nets don't hire him, it's the Nets who would be losing out on a good candidate, not the candidate losing out on a good organization.
I do not want Colangelo at all. Was awful in Toronto, and that bargnani pick just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I also don't want Thibs or Mark Jackson, as they remind me too much of Lionel Hollins (inflexible coaches stuck in their ways, who can rub players the wrong way).
I can see why you'd say that but it seems like you have dislike of these guys based on rumors.
Colangelo wasn't that great in Toronto but he was very good in Phoenix. Since his most recent role was in Toronto, it makes sense why people have soured on him.
I'd like to find out a lot more about him before I take a side and not just be swayed by the "Bargs" comments as if that should be the end of all discussion. The guy made mistakes (most GMs do) and now is the time to do a thorough search to see if he's actually learned from his mistakes.
Regarding the coaches...yes, Mark Jackson and Thibs have been noted to be stubborn but they are far more different than they are similar.
Aside from Mark Jackson's personal issues, Mark Jackson is not a good coach because he eschews analytics for the most part and is just a motivational speaker/coach. His assistant coaches did most of the X and O work while he talked about "not quitting", "fighting for it", and "wanting it more than the other team". He had issues with the front office because he didn't want to make changes to his assistant coaching staff. Jackson hired "his guys" and not guys who were really the best available candidates. Lacob, the owner of the Warriors, even detailed the reasons why Mark was let go and said as much
here.
Thibs was/is a defensive analytics fiend who broke off his engagement because he didn't have time for a relationship since he had basketball in his life.
The one knock that I'll definitely grant you is that he played his guys too hard. With that said, you can't say that he didn't get the most out of his guys. Those Bulls squads he coached had no business winning 50 games with Rose's constant injuries and before Butler's emergence, yet Thibs consistently got his guys to play hard and to compete.
He masterminded Boston's historic championship defense in 2008 and he was able to carry it over to the Bulls. While Thibs was there, the Bulls were top 5 in opponent eFG% and free throws per field goal, which meant that they forced you into tough shots and didn't foul you so you can get free shots at the line.
Despite having subpar team offense, they would almost always be able to keep games close even against good teams because of their suffocating defense.
Unlike Lacob' advocating for better assistants, the Bulls front office took away Ron Adams from Thibodeau because
he didn't like the personnel changes the front office made in letting Kyle Korver and CJ Watson go and bringing back Kirk Hinrich. (Look at how Korver did before suffering an injury due to Delladova)
I've already written in previous posts (
here and
here) that show how connected Thibs is with players and coaches and how good his defensive schemes truly are.
The Bulls front office divisiveness goes back to MJ and PJax. Superstars, like even native Chicagoan Dwyane Wade, have
criticized the Bulls for not being loyal and this was just before Wade was going to become a free agent and people thought Chicago had a chance.
The Warriors front office weren't at fault, but Mark Jackson was. The very next year, a rookie coach very much open to analytics, took basically that same squad and won a title.
Thibs was a bit at fault for his departure from Chicago but Bulls front office were far from sinless.
You can say that Mark Jackson and Thibs were stubborn but any similarities between the two end there.
On a related note, I'd absolutely love to see what Thibs could do with an assistant coach who's an offensive guru like a Mike D'Antoni (I know he's with the Sixers). If they could agree on personnel to run who can do what they want on offense and defense, it would be a hell of a show.