Prokorov wrote:
2) supreme court appointments are pretty much lifetime positions. and with 2 others in their 80's we may have trump appoint 2 more. that a real shift in how this country will be shaped and who hears supreme court cases. those rulings set precidents that all future cases will be dependant on. this is scary!
.
If you think about it, every aspect of our checks-and-balance system is skewed -albeit arguably slightly - toward the red rural states.
_(1)_the Presidency by the Electoral College by awarding 2 extra electoral votes to each state no matter how many voters it has (compounded by a winner-take-all contest)
_(2)_the Senate (More rural states => in general, more Red State Senators)
_(3)_the House (more Red States => more control of gerrymandering)
_(4) the Supreme Court: see (1) and (2) above.
Kinda crazy.
Now, having said that, I don't see how anyone can take much solace in the fact that Trumperino lost the popular vote. In fairness, there's no way what the turn out would have been if voting took place under a total popular vote approach and what the results would have been. Then on the other other hand, there is pretty good evidence that he might have lost.






























