Paradise wrote:
That's why I've always included him in my list of desired bigs. Although I can see a team reaching for him.
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

Paradise wrote:
Curns13 wrote:Prok is right. Bazemore had career best numbers almost across the board with LA. It was only a 23 game run though so tiny sample size. Reason he didn't get paid was he also had his career worse numbers that same season with GS including a 6.2 PER.
NyCeEvO wrote:Paradise wrote:
That's why I've always included him in my list of desired bigs. Although I can see a team reaching for him.
Kaiser30 wrote:Curns13 wrote:Prok is right. Bazemore had career best numbers almost across the board with LA. It was only a 23 game run though so tiny sample size. Reason he didn't get paid was he also had his career worse numbers that same season with GS including a 6.2 PER.
The 2014 LA Lakers were a 25 win team. Just like Ellington, he produced solid stats on a bad team in tank mode. The way I see it, Bazemore became a better defender in Atlanta and an important piece on a good team. I'm cool with saying "The Hawks did a good job scouting him and got him on the cheap". But I don't think you can say that he didn't make any progress in Atlanta despite turning into a highly demanded free agent.




Kaiser30 wrote:Curns13 wrote:Prok is right. Bazemore had career best numbers almost across the board with LA. It was only a 23 game run though so tiny sample size. Reason he didn't get paid was he also had his career worse numbers that same season with GS including a 6.2 PER.
The 2014 LA Lakers were a 25 win team. Just like Ellington, he produced solid stats on a bad team in tank mode. The way I see it, Bazemore became a better defender in Atlanta and an important piece on a good team. I'm cool with saying "The Hawks did a good job scouting him and got him on the cheap". But I don't think you can say that he didn't make any progress in Atlanta despite turning into a highly demanded free agent.



MrDollarBills wrote:Why not draft both Latvian players?
Prokorov wrote:kamaze wrote:Prokorov wrote:
no one who knows basketball takes crabbe over turner. crabbe is an enormous liability. you dont really need to work to gaurd him (he wont put it on the floor and he is shy to shoot unless he is super wide open) and on defense he absolutely kills you.
everything you can do with crabbe you can do better with joe harris.
crabbe is REALLY awful. like of all the guys who play 25+ minutes he has got to be among the worst of them.
turner isnt good, but he provides a utility, wont kill you on defense, rebounds, and is great around young players.
That's why the team offered him that contract and Portland matched right?
Joe was signed after Portland matched but you want people to believe he's better? One got $74 million the other a minimum contract but the one who got the minimum is better riiiight.
You left out the most important part he's a shooting guard who can't shoot!
1) I think we know by now that making more money then someone doesnt make you better. There is a reason that after ONE season portland already regrets the crabbe deal and is considering giving up a pick to mvoe him.
2) We dont really have to speculate. we have the stats to show that Joe Harris is better (unless you dont think defense matters, in which case its about even)
3) how is harris a shooting gaurd who cant shoot? he led the team in three point shooting at 39%... and unlike crabbe it wasnt just catch and shoot threes.
if your only argument for crabbe is "he makes more" thats kind of a weak argument.
NyCeEvO wrote:Paradise wrote:
That's why I've always included him in my list of desired bigs. Although I can see a team reaching for him.
Keith Van Horn wrote:NyCeEvO wrote:Paradise wrote:
That's why I've always included him in my list of desired bigs. Although I can see a team reaching for him.
you mean we could have our own unicorn? Both teams' marketing depts would love blowing up matchups all season long... lol. Of course he'd have to have the NBA game to back it up though.

Prokorov wrote:
turner promotes ball movement. he finds the open guy, he gets in the lane. he rebounds. yeah he is a below average player and doesnt shoot threes but he is still twice the player crabbe is.
crabbe is REALLY awful.

Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.

Keith Van Horn wrote:NyCeEvO wrote:Paradise wrote:
That's why I've always included him in my list of desired bigs. Although I can see a team reaching for him.
you mean we could have our own unicorn? Both teams' marketing depts would love blowing up matchups all season long... lol. Of course he'd have to have the NBA game to back it up though.