vincecarter4pres wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:ecuhus1981 wrote:I understand this, and I honestly believe our players that they are close and want to stay together.
Interpersonal relationships are important for rosters, but it's not the end-all, be-all. A team needs clearly defined roles, and a balance of strengths and weaknesses. We saw with Philadelphia the problem with an uber-talented team that just doesn't fit well together. They play almost as well without a member of their core as when they're whole, because a player's absence meant less redundancy on the court at once. That's great for weathering injuries and still being able to beat bad teams, but it hamstrings your efforts to beat good teams in the postseason, even at 100%.
We just don't have enough defenders or "dogs", like all of the other teams you see still alive in the playoffs.
We can add defenders/dogs through Free Agency, the draft or minor trades.
I just don't see the need to trade our core group of players.
You can't just assume we won't fit well together before these guys have even had a chance to play together.
My thing is I feel like,"core group", is being overused and overstated in conversation about this team. It's our core cause it's all Marks had to work with. This isn't like when KD joined GSW. This is LeBron joining LAL. Or LeBron and Bosh joining Miami. If you can keep some good young guys like Chalmers, Beasley and Haslem in Miami, or Kuzma in LAL(and what should have been Zubac) and add a superstar, or keep even one more young guy and still add a star like Jrue, you do it.
Kyrie and KD definitely have good relationships with Caris/Spencer and it probably played a role in them coming here.
Lets not act like that doesn't matter. We need good chemistry.






















