MrDollarBills wrote:I'm good if the Nets decide to trade both of these idiots and start rebuilding.
Kyrie doesn't deserve a max contract and shouldn't get one based on his unreliable, erratic and utterly selfish behavior. If KD has a problem with it, he's free to start fielding offers from other teams. I don't care about their friendship, I watch this team to see the Nets win. If either of them aren't willing to do whats necessary to win, I don't want them here. They both got exposed badly by Boston, what will change in a year's time if we cave in to their god awful demands? Nash is still the coach. Kyrie is still a nutball. The playbook is out on KD. We're not beating Boston, Milwaukee, or Miami with this group.
Once both are gone, Sean Marks needs to be fired. I don't care what anyone says, he has been absolutely terrible over the last 12 months.
How much support is there in the fan base for a rebuild though?
Will attendance hold up?
Unlikely to get stars in return so it's mostly going to be expiring contracts and a lot of draft assets.
Could be years before Nets contend again. Look at Orlando, how long they've been accumulating your players. Houston and OKC are also approaching a long stretch. OKC will have to either extend or trade some of their young players in a year or two.
If Nets gave Kyrie what he and presumably KD want, they could contend the next 3 years or so, assuming Simmons returns to form.
Kyrie if nothing else would provide spacing because of elite shooting, to counteract them ignoring Simmons when he's off-ball.
But yeah, there needs to be incentives for games played or else he could pull the same stunts again, play just 30 games a season.