
but would gladly support throwing a moderate offer at Jaymichal Green
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO



shakendfries wrote:team don't spend money shudders at the thought of overpaying for the services of KCP
but would gladly support throwing a moderate offer at Jaymichal Green
hood30 wrote:Prokorov wrote:hood30 wrote:Sorry, not that high on KCP..I wouldn't go above $15M for him...I think his contract will be worst than Crabbe in a year or two...At least, Crabbe is a much better shooter at 6'6 who can play both SF/SG...KCP can only play SG and forces Brooklyn to put 1 of his best player on the bench and he's not even better than the guy he'd be starting over..
I'd rather trade for Crabbe than offer KCP 18Mill....The better option is to save the money..I'm pretty sure better players will be available by trading deadline, as team are out of the playoff and need to unload player so to start tanking.
worse then crabbe? he might literally have to retire to be a worse contract then crabbe.
he is a better shooter then crabbe. crabbe shoots a higher percentage but on like half the volume and 97% catch and shoot. (KCP shot 45.2% on catch and shoot for comparison). KCP took just 78% of his shots on catch and shoot. you tell crabbe he has to take 2 more threes a game and they have to be off the dribble and see what his percentage looks like then.
and what difference does it make if crabbe can play SG or SF when he cant defend either position? worse then skil defensively and just above bogs defensively. among the worst defenders in the league (by the analytics, not hyperbole).
Keep in mind KCP played 33 minute per game last year, in compare to Crabbe's 28mpg, so I wouldn't use the volume as a huge problem...Crabbe is a legit pure shooter and I have no doubt that under 30+ minute per game and more shots, he'd be able to up his volume and score more points than KCP....33mpg and only 13.8ppg??..That's not good.
Crabbe is more efficient too across the board.Huge gap.....Not only for last year stats but career wize..Crabbe is a career 41% shooter from 3point while KCP is only a 35% which is not bad, but he's clearly not in Crabbe's level.
Just think about it, Lin is also a 35% career 3point shooter and you're willing to pay KCP 18M to start ahead of Lin??..At least, Lin gives you some play-making and defense at SG..I'd rather keep the money rather than spend it on KCP.
I'd bring KCP here but not for 18M...15M would be my red line..I simply don't think the guy is that good..I think Tim Hardaway is better and I think this guy will be a terrible contract for the knicks
Papi_swav wrote:Guys, What about sign and trade options ? There were rumors saying the Grizzlies are trying to work out a S&T for Green, how about Booker and Kilpatrick/Joe Harris for Green? Or a package of the minimum guys like Acy, Kilpatrick, Joe Harris etc..? Pistons might want to save money but if Green comes, then Booker is gone.
Maybe try to S&T for KCP too? can clear up some cap space and Pistons can probably use some shooting.
I think we should turn our attention to Dedmon, can't lowball him because Spurs will match it, he's turning 28. Would 4/44 get it done?


hood30 wrote:
Keep in mind KCP played 33 minute per game last year, in compare to Crabbe's 28mpg, so I wouldn't use the volume as a huge problem...Crabbe is a legit pure shooter and I have no doubt that under 30+ minute per game and more shots, he'd be able to up his volume and score more points than KCP....33mpg and only 13.8ppg??..That's not good.
Crabbe is more efficient too across the board.Huge gap.....Not only for last year stats but career wize..Crabbe is a career 41% shooter from 3point while KCP is only a 35% which is not bad, but he's clearly not in Crabbe's level.
Just think about it, Lin is also a 35% career 3point shooter and you're willing to pay KCP 18M to start ahead of Lin??..At least, Lin gives you some play-making and defense at SG..I'd rather keep the money rather than spend it on KCP.
I'd bring KCP here but not for 18M...15M would be my red line..I simply don't think the guy is that good..I think Tim Hardaway is better and I think this guy will be a terrible contract for the knicks
Prokorov wrote:hood30 wrote:
Keep in mind KCP played 33 minute per game last year, in compare to Crabbe's 28mpg, so I wouldn't use the volume as a huge problem...Crabbe is a legit pure shooter and I have no doubt that under 30+ minute per game and more shots, he'd be able to up his volume and score more points than KCP....33mpg and only 13.8ppg??..That's not good.
How many more shots would crabbe take in 5 more minutes? 1? 2?. he starts and plays 28 minutes. the issue is usage not court time. i dont see how crabbe efficiency would stay the same on more volume, given more volume usually means more shots on the ball.Crabbe is more efficient too across the board.Huge gap.....Not only for last year stats but career wize..Crabbe is a career 41% shooter from 3point while KCP is only a 35% which is not bad, but he's clearly not in Crabbe's level.
He isnt more efficient so much that he does all his work off the ball and only takes open shots. he creates less then 5% of his own offense. you can say crabbe is 41% and KCP is 41% but KCP is 45.2% on catch and shoot threes. in crabbes role he would have been more efficient then crabbeJust think about it, Lin is also a 35% career 3point shooter and you're willing to pay KCP 18M to start ahead of Lin??..At least, Lin gives you some play-making and defense at SG..I'd rather keep the money rather than spend it on KCP.
yes. or over levert.I'd bring KCP here but not for 18M...15M would be my red line..I simply don't think the guy is that good..I think Tim Hardaway is better and I think this guy will be a terrible contract for the knicks
Tim hardway isnt close to better.
ackypoo wrote:bucks fan coming in peace
bucks send: rashad vaughn, john henson
bucks receive: jeremy lin
happy to include something else. what needs to be included?
hood30 wrote:ackypoo wrote:bucks fan coming in peace
bucks send: rashad vaughn, john henson
bucks receive: jeremy lin
happy to include something else. what needs to be included?
Nets would take a first round draft pick...Also, Lin would be a rental since he has an opt-out clause on his contract after this season.
Doesn't the Bucks already have a back-up PG?..Why would they need Lin..I think they have a decent looking rookie + Dellanova.
ackypoo wrote:hood30 wrote:ackypoo wrote:bucks fan coming in peace
bucks send: rashad vaughn, john henson
bucks receive: jeremy lin
happy to include something else. what needs to be included?
Nets would take a first round draft pick...Also, Lin would be a rental since he has an opt-out clause on his contract after this season.
Doesn't the Bucks already have a back-up PG?..Why would they need Lin..I think they have a decent looking rookie + Dellanova.
lin would make a great 6th man for the bucks, imo. would definitely want him as a rental/expiring.
not sure id see him playing PG as much as just a combo guard that can create. delly isnt really a ball handling PG, hes better off ball. so if lin/delly wanted to run the 2nd unit, i think itd be fine.
hood30 wrote:ackypoo wrote:hood30 wrote:
Nets would take a first round draft pick...Also, Lin would be a rental since he has an opt-out clause on his contract after this season.
Doesn't the Bucks already have a back-up PG?..Why would they need Lin..I think they have a decent looking rookie + Dellanova.
lin would make a great 6th man for the bucks, imo. would definitely want him as a rental/expiring.
not sure id see him playing PG as much as just a combo guard that can create. delly isnt really a ball handling PG, hes better off ball. so if lin/delly wanted to run the 2nd unit, i think itd be fine.
Including your first round pick would probably do it, so not sure whether you'd want to do it for a rental...Also, where does that leave Brogdon?..Having Lin, Brogdon and Della is a bit too much..Your team is set at PG unless you're willing to include Brogdon in the trade.
ackypoo wrote:hood30 wrote:ackypoo wrote:lin would make a great 6th man for the bucks, imo. would definitely want him as a rental/expiring.
not sure id see him playing PG as much as just a combo guard that can create. delly isnt really a ball handling PG, hes better off ball. so if lin/delly wanted to run the 2nd unit, i think itd be fine.
Including your first round pick would probably do it, so not sure whether you'd want to do it for a rental...Also, where does that leave Brogdon?..Having Lin, Brogdon and Della is a bit too much..Your team is set at PG unless you're willing to include Brogdon in the trade.
not interested in including anything except vaughn and maybe the kings 2nd rounder next year.
certainly not brogdon.
Prokorov wrote:hood30 wrote:
Keep in mind KCP played 33 minute per game last year, in compare to Crabbe's 28mpg, so I wouldn't use the volume as a huge problem...Crabbe is a legit pure shooter and I have no doubt that under 30+ minute per game and more shots, he'd be able to up his volume and score more points than KCP....33mpg and only 13.8ppg??..That's not good.
How many more shots would crabbe take in 5 more minutes? 1? 2?. he starts and plays 28 minutes. the issue is usage not court time. i dont see how crabbe efficiency would stay the same on more volume, given more volume usually means more shots on the ball.Crabbe is more efficient too across the board.Huge gap.....Not only for last year stats but career wize..Crabbe is a career 41% shooter from 3point while KCP is only a 35% which is not bad, but he's clearly not in Crabbe's level.
He isnt more efficient so much that he does all his work off the ball and only takes open shots. he creates less then 5% of his own offense. you can say crabbe is 41% and KCP is 41% but KCP is 45.2% on catch and shoot threes. in crabbes role he would have been more efficient then crabbeJust think about it, Lin is also a 35% career 3point shooter and you're willing to pay KCP 18M to start ahead of Lin??..At least, Lin gives you some play-making and defense at SG..I'd rather keep the money rather than spend it on KCP.
yes. or over levert.I'd bring KCP here but not for 18M...15M would be my red line..I simply don't think the guy is that good..I think Tim Hardaway is better and I think this guy will be a terrible contract for the knicks
Tim hardway isnt close to better.