ImageImageImageImageImage

Reported NJ/CHI Deal

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
netsfanbq
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,449
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Kansas

 

Post#41 » by netsfanbq » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:06 pm

I'd do this deal in a heart-beat -- before Chicago changes their minds!

You still have Kidd Carter & RJ...

Your bench is Noc (can back up the 3 and 4) Thabo (BETTER player and prospect than Wright...can play 3 positions) AND we're getting back Krstic soon...

Yeah, we lose Marcus, and that's a blow...but don't overrate our own players. He'll be good...not the next JKidd.

We don't get a big...but we fix three of what I think our biggest problems are:

1. our D is terrible. One big man addition isn't going to change this (unless it was a KG-type). Noc isn't an all-league defender, but he's a major annoyance to those playing against him...and he has a nasty streak. Thabo is a good defender as well.

2. We get shooters...Thabo isn't lights out, but as good a Toine, and Noc is good from 3 and the line.

3. Athletes. Throw out a lineup of kidd, thabo, rj, williams and boone, and we finally have an athletic lineup kidd can run with.

SOOO...we improve our horrid D and hustle, improve our offense...AND here's the kicker...we still have the big 3. So we can STILL take offers for Carter or RJ to get a big -- and if we do move one of them, we're better equipped to handle the loss from the wings. DO IT NOW!!!!!

And who do we really lose??? Boki? Had one good year...no biggie...Wright? Thabo's better. Mags? We don't even play him!!! Marcus hurts, has potential, but also some red flags and hey, you can't expect to give up crap for good players.

DO IT NOW!!!! I'm stunned anyone doesn't want to do this! DO IT!!!!
Walk away from this ASAP.
mack69
Pro Prospect
Posts: 928
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 04, 2005

 

Post#42 » by mack69 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:14 pm

I like the trade but i wish they can keep Wright.
The "Turnpike" deserve a NBA championship!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
RJ 24
Senior
Posts: 510
And1: 10
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: NJ

 

Post#43 » by RJ 24 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:25 pm

netsfanbq wrote:I'd do this deal in a heart-beat -- before Chicago changes their minds!

You still have Kidd Carter & RJ...

Your bench is Noc (can back up the 3 and 4) Thabo (BETTER player and prospect than Wright...can play 3 positions) AND we're getting back Krstic soon...

Yeah, we lose Marcus, and that's a blow...but don't overrate our own players. He'll be good...not the next JKidd.

We don't get a big...but we fix three of what I think our biggest problems are:

1. our D is terrible. One big man addition isn't going to change this (unless it was a KG-type). Noc isn't an all-league defender, but he's a major annoyance to those playing against him...and he has a nasty streak. Thabo is a good defender as well.

2. We get shooters...Thabo isn't lights out, but as good a Toine, and Noc is good from 3 and the line.

3. Athletes. Throw out a lineup of kidd, thabo, rj, williams and boone, and we finally have an athletic lineup kidd can run with.

SOOO...we improve our horrid D and hustle, improve our offense...AND here's the kicker...we still have the big 3. So we can STILL take offers for Carter or RJ to get a big -- and if we do move one of them, we're better equipped to handle the loss from the wings. DO IT NOW!!!!!

And who do we really lose??? Boki? Had one good year...no biggie...Wright? Thabo's better. Mags? We don't even play him!!! Marcus hurts, has potential, but also some red flags and hey, you can't expect to give up crap for good players.

DO IT NOW!!!! I'm stunned anyone doesn't want to do this! DO IT!!!!

that is all 100% true. Like he said, if we do make that VC or RJ trade, then Noc can step right into the starting lineup. it would be better than Wright or Boki stepping into it.
Image
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,922
And1: 1,588
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#44 » by ecuhus1981 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:08 am

Sham wrote:Good luck to you all if you think Nocioni is a good defensive player.


+1

The Bulls are trying to sell Nocioni's antics as defensive intensity. And I am scared as heck that our FO is actually buying this spiel!

Andres gets torched on a regular basis. If we're not going to trade for a big, we at least need to trade for a top-tier defender. Andres and his LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG contract are neither. Thabo is a versatile defender, but not worth this package.

Like many have said, without Marcus, it's conceivable, although I'm still not enthused about tying up salary while moving all of our filler trade pieces for a minor tweak. But with Willliams in the deal, it's a decisive no.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

 

Post#45 » by jzmagik » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:20 am

Noc is far from a defensive specialist like some have said here. Bringing in defensive specialists will not improve our defense!!!! It starts with the rest of our personnel, our coaches, and our players. One player will not make us a better defensive team for gods sake. What we need is a coach that actually cares about defense.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,922
And1: 1,588
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#46 » by ecuhus1981 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:21 am

Also, Andres Nocioni has an expensive contract, that increases through 2012. People are all assuming that this deal opens the floodgates to dozens of teams willing to trade their elite PF for RJ. It's simply not the case. We may have to give up more than we want (like Krstic+Sean) to get that sort of trade completed.

And if we don't trade RJ (or VC, if we think that we can convert Richard into a SG), we're stuck with two SFs on massive contracts. We're basically inheriting the exact problem Chicago is trying to avoid, with Luol's large extension looming. Add that to the fact that we're going to re-sign Nenad and hopefully reinforce our roster with more some depth in the off-season, and this is exactly the move we don't want to make.

I don't like this trade for many reasons. The bottom line is, this is not a set-up trade for a larger maneuver later. I hate to say it, but this is a classic Kiki move; one that serves little purpose on the court, but has major financial repercussions.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
AGGiE
Banned User
Posts: 3,718
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

 

Post#47 » by AGGiE » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:22 am

User avatar
bigballa3jj
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 183
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#48 » by bigballa3jj » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:39 am



sigh.....he needs to do more of that
User avatar
Flite
Starter
Posts: 2,171
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 10, 2007

 

Post#49 » by Flite » Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:45 am

We get 2 potential shooters, but a defensive minded player in Nocioni.


Thabo = Non existant jumpshot, great defender

Andres = Chucker, absolutely no defence
User avatar
jcrack32
Sophomore
Posts: 124
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 20, 2008

 

Post#50 » by jcrack32 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:06 am

Comparing player for player, we would come out on top if we do this trade. Clearly, Nocioni is better than Boki and Thabo better than Wright. This would definitely strengthen our bench (even with the losses of M. Williams and Mags). But what it also does is that it puts a lot of pressure on this team as it is currently fit (plus the addition of a healthy Kristic, Nocioni and Thabo) to be good enough to contend. Making this trade takes away a lot of our flexibility in my opinion. We lose our expiring contracts that could potentially help us. Why make a trade if we're essentially gonna be left in the same position after the trade?

Our biggest problem has been our defense. Its always been this way. We're used to winning a lot of close games because our defense keeps us close and we make smart plays at the end. This year, our defense has been atrocious. This trade does little to help us there.
I don't think this trade makes our team that much more of a contender. Its more of a lateral move than a vertical move.
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

 

Post#51 » by Kosta » Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:11 am

G_MoNeY wrote:Got my mind working the trade checker for another move, if this one were to happen.

NJ Trades:
RJ/Allen/Boone/Armstrong

TOR Trades: Bosh/Graham/Garbajosa

TOR saves $20M roughly doing this deal. They get insurance with Armstrong to backup Calderon. Colangelo is actively searching for PG help. Allen and Armstrong are both expiring deals. They get a young big in Boone who would shine in their system, in my opinion. We rid ourselves of RJ but RJ provides something TOR needs. They lose their franchise in Bosh -- but is he really worth the extra $20M? At first glance, probably...but who knows. Saving that money they could attract a top-tier FA or have flexibility to make draft day moves.

Our new team:

Starters: Kidd/VC/Nocioni/Bosh/Krstic

Bench: Duhon/Sefolosha/Graham/J. Smith/Sean Williams


I can dream can't I? :)


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
bigballa3jj
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,336
And1: 183
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Location: Louisville, KY

 

Post#52 » by bigballa3jj » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:16 am

lol toronto isn't trading bosh
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

 

Post#53 » by Kosta » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:50 am

bigballa3jj wrote:lol toronto isn't trading bosh


My favorite part of the trade was the insurance we get in Darrel Armstrong. :rofl:

G-Money needs to realize that when it comes to franchise all-star players money ain't a damn thing. I mean, who else are you going to get as good as Bosh in free agency? Um, nobody.

Set your standards, lower, much lower. I'm thinking like maybe J.O, but you'll have to add in much more than just R.J and Gasol is probably way out of your league for R.J and pieces. At least Vince would have to be part of the deal.

First you propose for West, no chance you get him. Now Bosh, which is all that much more ridiculous. At least make proposals that wouldn't get rejected on your PS2 system, man.

But hey, everyone can dream...
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#54 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:16 am

ecuhus1981 wrote:Also, Andres Nocioni has an expensive contract, that increases through 2012. People are all assuming that this deal opens the floodgates to dozens of teams willing to trade their elite PF for RJ. It's simply not the case. We may have to give up more than we want (like Krstic+Sean) to get that sort of trade completed..


Why are you writing this statement??

It is totally false.

http://www.shamsports.com/content/pages ... /bulls.jsp

Nocioni's salary goes DOWN every year.

He is on a reverse contract: like wallace, Hinrich & Joe Smith.

(When asked about the proposed trade, Paxson just said "no comment". Deng's injury makes it less likely now that the deal will happen.)
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
G_MoNeY
Veteran
Posts: 2,613
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 19, 2004

 

Post#55 » by G_MoNeY » Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:50 pm

Kosta wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



My favorite part of the trade was the insurance we get in Darrel Armstrong. :rofl:

G-Money needs to realize that when it comes to franchise all-star players money ain't a damn thing. I mean, who else are you going to get as good as Bosh in free agency? Um, nobody.

Set your standards, lower, much lower. I'm thinking like maybe J.O, but you'll have to add in much more than just R.J and Gasol is probably way out of your league for R.J and pieces. At least Vince would have to be part of the deal.

First you propose for West, no chance you get him. Now Bosh, which is all that much more ridiculous. At least make proposals that wouldn't get rejected on your PS2 system, man.

But hey, everyone can dream...


guys...it was a joke! LOL

As far as looking for players who would get us over the top...Both of them are. David West, in my opinion, isn't as "untouchable" as many might think. Bosh is in that category, but is the type of player we need. That was my point. About your Darrell Armstrong comment, Toronto IS looking for help at PG and DA is playing well when given minutes, regardless of his age. He could be a cheap fix until Ford comes back and is better than Martin. Overall on the trade I was joking.....didn't think I'd have to spell that out for you guys.

And move up in the world, they have PS3s now :)
G_MoNeY
Veteran
Posts: 2,613
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 19, 2004

 

Post#56 » by G_MoNeY » Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:15 pm

After reading some comments by Bulls fans and looking at Nocioni's contract, I think I'm hesitant on this. What about re-evaluating a trade with something like this...

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=
User avatar
Pugsley_2491
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 29, 2007

 

Post#57 » by Pugsley_2491 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:04 pm

G_MoNeY wrote:After reading some comments by Bulls fans and looking at Nocioni's contract, I think I'm hesitant on this. What about re-evaluating a trade with something like this...

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

doesn't make much sense for us
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

 

Post#58 » by Kosta » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:09 pm

G_MoNeY wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



guys...it was a joke! LOL

As far as looking for players who would get us over the top...Both of them are. David West, in my opinion, isn't as "untouchable" as many might think. Bosh is in that category, but is the type of player we need. That was my point. About your Darrell Armstrong comment, Toronto IS looking for help at PG and DA is playing well when given minutes, regardless of his age. He could be a cheap fix until Ford comes back and is better than Martin. Overall on the trade I was joking.....didn't think I'd have to spell that out for you guys.

And move up in the world, they have PS3s now :)


The Hornets are 29-12 in the West right now, are they really interested in trading their second best player? Not only that, but their 27 year old PF who is signed to a great contract long term? Unless they got knocked over with a completely insane offer for him, he's going nowhere. Obviously R.J for West would be a huge step back for them.

As for Darrell Armstrong? :rofl:

O.k, it's not that funny, but it was how you brought it up in a trade for Bosh, acquiring Armstrong as "insurance" in a trade where we're giving up our franchise player is just silly. :lol:

And honestly Armstrong is not a better option than Dixon.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#59 » by NetsForce » Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:37 pm

Armstrong is not a better option than Dixon. He's a significantly better option than Dixon.

- Hi Kosta, haven't seen you around these parts in a while.
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

 

Post#60 » by Kosta » Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:14 pm

NetsForce wrote:Armstrong is not a better option than Dixon. He's a significantly better option than Dixon.

- Hi Kosta, haven't seen you around these parts in a while.


He's averaging a whopping 2.1 points, 1.4 assists and 35% from the field in 11.2 minutes per game. He's out of date bro. At least Dixon can shoot the 3. It's beyond me how you think he's a significant upgrade over Dixon.

Yeah, so will you change your name to the 14ersForce after G.S pounds the Nets by 20 plus tonight? :wink:

And I have to say this, looking over Magloire's stats, what happened to him? That's just brutal.

Return to Brooklyn Nets