If your basis on Siakam not being a #1 is this year's playoffs (in which he's still doing a better job than anyone not named Caris on our team), why wouldn't Russell's playoffs be their basis?MrDollarBills wrote:SpeedyG wrote:I get he's not Kawhi, but if you're going to blast Siakam about his playoffs performance, be prepared to get Russell's crappy showing thrown right back at you 10x over.MrDollarBills wrote:
I remember Raptors fans were talking big time **** about how Siakam was a good #1 option when Leonard was not in the line up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
!!!!!!
The difference between Siakam's playoffs vs Russell's playoffs isn't close.
Sent from my SM-G925T using RealGM mobile app
What does Russell's playoff performance have to do with the myth that Pascal Siakam would be just fine as the Raptors #1 with Leonard not there being busted have to do with each other? If that's all that they have to fall back on, then that doesn't really help to disprove my point.
I'm not knocking Siakam as a player but dudes on the GB were literally trying to tell me that he was a legit #1 w/o Leonard. Anyone could see that while he's an excellent PF, he is not a #1 type talent.
Sent from my SM-G925T using RealGM mobile app