Pablo Escobar wrote:Prokorov wrote:ecuhus1981 wrote:This would be the best possible timing for an mid-season coaching change. I'm still not willing to say that Marks should be fired if he doesn't fire Nash, mostly because that choice is career suicide. Marks knows that he would have to go if he fire Nash, because Durant would force Tsai's hand. They've been friends for decades, but I think Sean can see the need and would fire Steve, if Kevin would allow it. Kevin won't, and Sean is not a masochist, so the status quo will remain.
I dont understand this idea that KD is protecting Nash or picked him. Everything we know is the opposite. KD said he thought nash was good on GSW and that he thought he would be fine and agreed with Kyrie they "dont need a coach"
He didnt hand pick him. it wasnt KDs choice. that was marks move.
Him and Kd were super tight on the Warriors. He basically worked with Kd 1 on 1 to help him with his game. So of course Nash was his guy when they hired him. Nash also lets Kd and Kyrie do w/e they want on the offensive end so why would they be angry? and the coach comments were disrespectful but Kd agrees with everything Kyrie says because he's the alpha in the relationship.
Useless, talking to wall right here. Been saying that from the beginning. Some don't even bother to look around because it doesn't support their narrative. For example, why exactly Builaps was hired as HC. Thinking Nash was Marks hire is plain silly.
Prok would say Lue would've been the option than, well answer to that will be KD is an alfa dog. Marks knowing Nash from PHX days probably played role too. In addition to that, this player friendly environment that Marks created not exactly on his side. With all that said, I never seen teams hire rookie HC without logging a damn min. That just don't happen for obvious reasons we seeing right now.
Kerr was GM in PHX so he had clue what he had to do. Just look at Pop's, dude stepped down from GM spot to be HC. Kidd was direct effect to appease D.Will.