Humphries vs. Favors
Posted: Sun Jan 2, 2011 3:47 am
Hey, Celts fan here...
So I was bored tonight and caught some of the Nets/Wolves game, and I noticed that Humphries was a real bright spot on your team. I know in the past, he was known as a ballhog, but by the looks of his numbers, it appears he's consuming less percentages as a whole. Maybe in his 7th year, he finally "got it", or maybe he's just holding himself back in an effort to try and get a big contract. In any case, he seems like a quality NBA player and definitely an elite rebounder. When given 30+ minutes, he's all but a guaranteed double double.
So wouldn't it be in the Nets best interest to try and trade one of these 2 young forwards? At the evry least, I think they should commit to one and use the other one as bait for an upgrade on the wings. Humphries is an expiring deal, but he'd possibly take a "discount" to remain with the Nets if he knows they're committed to him? And Favors undoubtedly has more trade value, and there's really no guarantee taht he'll ever live up to his potential?
I guess why I'm basically asking is: Would it make more sense to keep Humphries and trade Favors for help elsewhere, or to keep them both and risk letting Humphries walk with no compensation?
So I was bored tonight and caught some of the Nets/Wolves game, and I noticed that Humphries was a real bright spot on your team. I know in the past, he was known as a ballhog, but by the looks of his numbers, it appears he's consuming less percentages as a whole. Maybe in his 7th year, he finally "got it", or maybe he's just holding himself back in an effort to try and get a big contract. In any case, he seems like a quality NBA player and definitely an elite rebounder. When given 30+ minutes, he's all but a guaranteed double double.
So wouldn't it be in the Nets best interest to try and trade one of these 2 young forwards? At the evry least, I think they should commit to one and use the other one as bait for an upgrade on the wings. Humphries is an expiring deal, but he'd possibly take a "discount" to remain with the Nets if he knows they're committed to him? And Favors undoubtedly has more trade value, and there's really no guarantee taht he'll ever live up to his potential?
I guess why I'm basically asking is: Would it make more sense to keep Humphries and trade Favors for help elsewhere, or to keep them both and risk letting Humphries walk with no compensation?