James is a power forward convert.
Hamilton is a pure small forward through and through, he's a water jump shooter, good off the ball, but he can handle it and create his own shot and is a solid slasher as well.
Hamilton has all the makings of a Granger type player, I would say that or prime Rashard Lewis is his ceiling, some Josh Howard mixed in there.
Brooks is a ball stopping chucker who's team built an offense around him so he could pad his stats, one of the fastest paced offenses in the country no less.
He is a blackhole who is going to have to work extremely hard to dramatically change his style of ball 180 to fit in with Deron and Brook, hell just the NBA in general.
He was efficient, but still a chucker. Listen, Jordan Crawford was a very efficient college player on a bad team that was much better then Brooks and he was horrid in the NBA.
His athleticism is highly overrated and he's a poor defender even if he has the tools.
Speedy says a Jamal Crawford type at 25 was great value and a great player to have.
Yes it's great value, no its' not a great player to have.
Are people forgetting the first 9 years of Crawford's career?!
Jamal's style doesn't support winning.
Even on Atlanta the dude's job is to chuck and he still kills any offensive flow if his jump shot isn't falling at a ridiculous rate.
Brooks team was 15 and 17.
Brooks senior year was like Tyreke Evans NBA rookie year.
Big shiny sexy stats on paper, terrible impact in real life.
If Hamilton and Honeycutt were gone I would have liked the pick, but I absolutely loathe it with those two still out there.
His ceiling is probably Kendall Gill, doubt he's that type of defender or team player though.
People keep saying oh, Nick Young, like that's a freaking good thing!
Nick Young sucks fat monkey nuts! He isn't a good player!
****ing ****!
Make me eat my words, please!
