Shameer1016 wrote:
Because Rose in his 3rd year, I repeat it, 3rd year put up ridiculous numbers for his team, and lead them to the ECF.
Ahem, he was absolutely dreadful in last years playoffs. He didn't lead them anywhere. They played a 37 win team in the first round, they played the habitual playoff loser team in the second round and the overall team defense were the reasons why the Bulls made it to the ECF.
He took damn near 30 shots a game in the playoffs and shot under 40% from the field. I repeat, he shot under 40% while taking 30 shots a game.
Shameer1016 wrote:I love how everyone uses that small sample size this season how his team has a winning record without, but yet they found a

way to lose to us

.
20+ games is hardly a small sample. Thiboddeau is th Bulls' MVP. He has them playing world class defense. Of course, they are better with Rose, but the fact that they would be a playoff team without him just shows that he isn't the only/main reason why their an elite team.
And who cares if we beat them. We beat the Bulls with Rose twice last year. Besides, they just beat the heat without Rose not a week ago.
Shameer1016 wrote:Only thing I give #8 over Rose is his playmaking ability. Your turn slick.
The ONLY thing? How about:
Better three point shooter
Better mid range shooter
Better at posting up opposing PG's
Better at playing off the ball
Better catch and shoot player
And aside from playmaking, he makes players better. I mean, he had Boozer play like a legit All Star. Boozer in Chicago... ehh, not even close to what he was in Utah.
The only thing Rose does better is attack and finish around the rim. Then they are roughly equal in every other aspect of the game.