ImageImageImageImageImage

Well we just Livingston to Golden State

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
jerzeyguy201
Junior
Posts: 271
And1: 118
Joined: Jan 24, 2012
       

Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#1 » by jerzeyguy201 » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:37 am

Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
Livingston's deal with Warriors will be for three years, with a partial guarantee in final season, league source tells Yahoo.
#WeTheLost #WeTheCry #WeTheRobbed #WeTheFishin #WeTheDrake
User avatar
Mr. Dynomite!
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 818
Joined: Jul 04, 2006

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#2 » by Mr. Dynomite! » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:38 am

Paul is next. Don't the Nets have a pick this year? Tank.
Nebkreb11
Sophomore
Posts: 158
And1: 48
Joined: Jun 29, 2014
         

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#3 » by Nebkreb11 » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:40 am

We will have the worse pick of us and either Atlanta or Celtics, I forgot which one.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,015
And1: 11,965
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#4 » by Paradise » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:43 am

Mr. Dynomite! wrote:Paul is next. Don't the Nets have a pick this year? Tank.

Lol No.
User avatar
Mr. Dynomite!
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 818
Joined: Jul 04, 2006

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#5 » by Mr. Dynomite! » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:43 am

Nebkreb11 wrote:We will have the worse pick of us and either Atlanta or Celtics, I forgot which one.


Nevermind then.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,015
And1: 11,965
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#6 » by Paradise » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:46 am

I'm surprised. He could have gotten more years but It was a pleasure having him here. Very happy for him and grateful that he went to the West.

Sent from my LGMS659 using Tapatalk
MGrand15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,987
And1: 2,758
Joined: Nov 17, 2009

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#7 » by MGrand15 » Wed Jul 2, 2014 12:47 am

We lost Shaun Livingston! TANKKKKKKKKKKKKK. All hope is lost. How will we ever replace Shaun's MVP like production? There's no way we bounce back from this.

:lol :lol

I like Livingston but he was a flawed player with no 3pt shot and wasn't a true PG or a primary ballhandler. I'm happy he got a big contract, he deserves it.
kerry kittles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,896
And1: 1,198
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#8 » by kerry kittles » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:03 am

Good for Livingston, bad for the Nets. Wish him nothing but the best. We should really give a long hard look at signing Thabo. Provides defense, doesn't need touches on offense where we have a number of cooks in the kitchen. Surely he can't handle the ball like Livingston or take advantages of mismatches in the same way, but I feel like he's a solid replacement.

We also need a backup point guard. I don't feel comfortable with Guiterrez and Teague as our backups. I'd pray Nelson would take a vet minimum deal, but I'm not confident. I'd look at Shelvin Mack as well who I think may be a step above vet minimum.
User avatar
JMaine518
Starter
Posts: 2,372
And1: 156
Joined: Jul 17, 2012

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#9 » by JMaine518 » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:07 am

Good for him. He got his money and is on a better team. Now I think we have to try and make Thornton for Jack happen.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,015
And1: 11,965
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#10 » by Paradise » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:08 am

Livingston was effectively used more as our shooting guard more than a point guard.

Sefelosha and Hinrich should be looked at as his replacement.

The PG market is deep. We should be fine adding a backup but it isn't a huge priority right now.
User avatar
Keith Van Horn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,976
And1: 1,217
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
   

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#11 » by Keith Van Horn » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:08 am

Can we offer Nelson the deal we would have given Livingston, the 3 year 10 million? Or would he get more elsewhere?

Thanks for the solid year Livingston, best of luck in GS
User avatar
Keith Van Horn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,976
And1: 1,217
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
   

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#12 » by Keith Van Horn » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:09 am

Paradise wrote:Livingston was effectively used more as our shooting guard more than a point guard.

Sefelosha and Hinrich should be looked at as his replacement.

The PG market is deep. We should be fine adding a backup but it isn't a huge priority right now.

What would those 2 guys cost, more than vet min?
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#13 » by Prokorov » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:16 am

Paradise wrote:Livingston was effectively used more as our shooting guard more than a point guard.

Sefelosha and Hinrich should be looked at as his replacement.

The PG market is deep. We should be fine adding a backup but it isn't a huge priority right now.


agree with this. it was a lock livingston wouldnt be back. while i loved the dude, he is certainly replaceable. would love hinrich or sefelosha... 2 guys who are tough as nails and play hard.

Pierce is the only guy who if we lost him would really make a big impact. every one else who is an FA or might retire would be replaceable/minor loss
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#14 » by Prokorov » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:16 am

macgyver893 wrote:
Paradise wrote:Livingston was effectively used more as our shooting guard more than a point guard.

Sefelosha and Hinrich should be looked at as his replacement.

The PG market is deep. We should be fine adding a backup but it isn't a huge priority right now.

What would those 2 guys cost, more than vet min?

mMLE
User avatar
JoseRizal
General Manager
Posts: 7,973
And1: 2,279
Joined: Oct 21, 2010
 

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#15 » by JoseRizal » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:16 am

The fact that Meeks got more money than Shaun makes the deal for GSW superb...
MGrand15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,987
And1: 2,758
Joined: Nov 17, 2009

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#16 » by MGrand15 » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:24 am

I wonder if Livingston, Iguodala, Lee and Bogut will be able to play together. That's a lot of non-shooting on the floor. Even if Curry is the other guy on the floor with them. I hope they use Livingston as combo guard and not just a backup PG.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,015
And1: 11,965
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#17 » by Paradise » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:29 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/484142502300356609[/tweet]
kerry kittles
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,896
And1: 1,198
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#18 » by kerry kittles » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:37 am

Prokorov wrote:
Paradise wrote:Livingston was effectively used more as our shooting guard more than a point guard.

Sefelosha and Hinrich should be looked at as his replacement.

The PG market is deep. We should be fine adding a backup but it isn't a huge priority right now.


agree with this. it was a lock livingston wouldnt be back. while i loved the dude, he is certainly replaceable. would love hinrich or sefelosha... 2 guys who are tough as nails and play hard.

Pierce is the only guy who if we lost him would really make a big impact. every one else who is an FA or might retire would be replaceable/minor loss


Agreed Pierce is the lynch pin. I hate to see Livingston go, but his production can be made up for more than Pierce's can. I think it's actually a blessing in disguise that Livingston signed this early into free agency. We're not going to be in a position to miss out on Sefelosha or Hinrich because we were waiting for a pipedream decision from SDot to stay. Both those guys are great guys to target with the mmle as a replacement
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#19 » by Prokorov » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:43 am

kerry kittles wrote:
Prokorov wrote:
Paradise wrote:Livingston was effectively used more as our shooting guard more than a point guard.

Sefelosha and Hinrich should be looked at as his replacement.

The PG market is deep. We should be fine adding a backup but it isn't a huge priority right now.


agree with this. it was a lock livingston wouldnt be back. while i loved the dude, he is certainly replaceable. would love hinrich or sefelosha... 2 guys who are tough as nails and play hard.

Pierce is the only guy who if we lost him would really make a big impact. every one else who is an FA or might retire would be replaceable/minor loss


Agreed Pierce is the lynch pin. I hate to see Livingston go, but his production can be made up for more than Pierce's can. I think it's actually a blessing in disguise that Livingston signed this early into free agency. We're not going to be in a position to miss out on Sefelosha or Hinrich because we were waiting for a pipedream decision from SDot to stay. Both those guys are great guys to target with the mmle as a replacement


id love to get hinrich...outstanding defender and gives us another high effort player. can play both gaurd spots and is dwill insurance as he can start at the 1 if needed.
therealbig3
RealGM
Posts: 29,468
And1: 16,055
Joined: Jul 31, 2010

Re: Well we just Livingston to Golden State 

Post#20 » by therealbig3 » Wed Jul 2, 2014 1:49 am

Would LOVE to get Kirk Hinrich, but Chicago loves him. Dude's been one of my favorite players since he entered the league. Excellent shooter (career 38% from 3), and he's a very smart PG with good court vision and the ability to control the pace of the game, and always makes the right pass. He's still a really solid defender too.

He's actually a lot like Livingston...except he's not as long or as versatile as Livingston on defense, and he can't create his own shot off the dribble like Livingston can on offense, but he's a much better spot up shooter with much better range, so it's a tradeoff. I'd rather have Livingston, but Hinrich would be a damn good replacement.

Return to Brooklyn Nets