NyCeEvO wrote:I don't think we'll be able to move up to get him but I think Kevin Knox could be Aaron Gordon-lite as a physical prospect but with a much more refined game under Kenny's tutelage.
I'm definitely a fan.
Moderators: NyCeEvO, Rich Rane
NyCeEvO wrote:I don't think we'll be able to move up to get him but I think Kevin Knox could be Aaron Gordon-lite as a physical prospect but with a much more refined game under Kenny's tutelage.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
vincecarter4pres wrote:NyCeEvO wrote:I don't think we'll be able to move up to get him but I think Kevin Knox could be Aaron Gordon-lite as a physical prospect but with a much more refined game under Kenny's tutelage.
I'm definitely a fan.
vincecarter4pres wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:TheNetsFan wrote:It depends on where you can get & who is available. Word was that Marks loved Donovan Mitchell, but had no way of getting up there. Mitchell fell to #13. If he loves a player that slides a bit, and he can trade Dinwiddie plus a 2019 1st (a reportedly weak draft) for a pick in the 10-15 range that lands a guy he views as Donovan Mitchell caliber, you do it. Maybe he can even get minimal protections on the pick (e.g. top 2 protected in 2019 & top 1 protected in 2020). In our situation, to trade a future pick it has to be for a player Marks feels will be a potential future star.
the thought of trading a 1st round pick makes my hands tremble.
I'd be OK with a scenario like that if he could put heavy protections on it in 2019, such as top 10 or so, then it conveys when we're hopefully in a better position, it would need like permanent top 8 protections though.
Prokorov wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:
the thought of trading a 1st round pick makes my hands tremble.
I'd be OK with a scenario like that if he could put heavy protections on it in 2019, such as top 10 or so, then it conveys when we're hopefully in a better position, it would need like permanent top 8 protections though.
Same here. you cant let the past effect making the right move. and if the right move is trading a future first pick you do it. i know everyone is shell shocked because of billy king, but teams move up with future picks and have it work all the time.
im not saying to do it, but if we like a guy enough, and thats what it takes id be fine doing it. and yeah, adding protections is basically mandatory now for all teams.
Also there is a HUUUUUGE difference trading a future pick for a current pick vs. trading a future pick for a veteran player.
Sleepyazn wrote:Prokorov wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:I'd be OK with a scenario like that if he could put heavy protections on it in 2019, such as top 10 or so, then it conveys when we're hopefully in a better position, it would need like permanent top 8 protections though.
Same here. you cant let the past effect making the right move. and if the right move is trading a future first pick you do it. i know everyone is shell shocked because of billy king, but teams move up with future picks and have it work all the time.
im not saying to do it, but if we like a guy enough, and thats what it takes id be fine doing it. and yeah, adding protections is basically mandatory now for all teams.
Also there is a HUUUUUGE difference trading a future pick for a current pick vs. trading a future pick for a veteran player.
I would have given up next years pick PROTECTED TOP 5 for a Mitchell.
Agreed 100%. I like Knox because he provides athleticism and size and would be much cheaper to acquire than signing away or trading for AG.Prokorov wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:NyCeEvO wrote:I don't think we'll be able to move up to get him but I think Kevin Knox could be Aaron Gordon-lite as a physical prospect but with a much more refined game under Kenny's tutelage.
I'm definitely a fan.
yup, i said it earlier in this thread. Knox is the guy id want and the best fit for the roster.
We really need an athletic, explosive wing badly. we have a couple athletic guys, but we need one who plays above the rim and lives in the paint.
NyCeEvO wrote:Agreed 100%. I like Knox because he provides athleticism and size and would be much cheaper to acquire than signing away or trading for AG.Prokorov wrote:vincecarter4pres wrote:I'm definitely a fan.
yup, i said it earlier in this thread. Knox is the guy id want and the best fit for the roster.
We really need an athletic, explosive wing badly. we have a couple athletic guys, but we need one who plays above the rim and lives in the paint.
These playoffs just prove to me that if you want a chance to compete in the playoffs it's imperative to have several athletic and long players. We're so undersized as a team.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
That's not a horrible thought. That's exactly what one should expect given how much the team has developed.MrDollarBills wrote:I agree with everyone the need to improve the athleticism. But unless make a killer deal on draft night I don't really see anyone at the end of this draft that is going to move the needle. but we say that every year, so who knows.
I had a horrible thought today. What if this offseason's work with the players we have now helps big time and the Nets mess around and win 38-40 games next season?
It would be just our luck for the one year where we collectively hope to get at least a pick within the top 12, we'd end up being in danger of getting a lower lottery pick instead
The timing window would have been much better if 2018 was the year instead when we finally end up having our own pick. We'd even have a realistic possibility of moving into top 5 or top 3 in this year's draft if we had our pick. But I guess Billy King envisioned the Nets being a playoffs team with 41 year old KG, and 40 year old Pierce in 2018.MrDollarBills wrote:well i expect 32-35 wins next season. i just notice that the improvement comes when we have a lottery pick in a draft where the top 5 players might be generational types lol.
we'll never win. i'm just here for the fun games i guess.
DarkXaero wrote:The timing window would have been much better if 2018 was the year instead when we finally end up having our own pick. We'd even have a realistic possibility of moving into top 5 or top 3 in this year's draft if we had our pick. But I guess Billy King envisioned the Nets being a playoffs team with 41 year old KG, and 40 year old Pierce in 2018.MrDollarBills wrote:well i expect 32-35 wins next season. i just notice that the improvement comes when we have a lottery pick in a draft where the top 5 players might be generational types lol.
we'll never win. i'm just here for the fun games i guess.
MrDollarBills wrote:I agree with everyone the need to improve the athleticism. But unless make a killer deal on draft night I don't really see anyone at the end of this draft that is going to move the needle. but we say that every year, so who knows.
I had a horrible thought today. What if this offseason's work with the players we have now helps big time and the Nets mess around and win 38-40 games next season?
It would be just our luck for the one year where we collectively hope to get at least a pick within the top 12, we'd end up being in danger of getting a lower lottery pick instead
Prokorov wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:I agree with everyone the need to improve the athleticism. But unless make a killer deal on draft night I don't really see anyone at the end of this draft that is going to move the needle. but we say that every year, so who knows.
I had a horrible thought today. What if this offseason's work with the players we have now helps big time and the Nets mess around and win 38-40 games next season?
It would be just our luck for the one year where we collectively hope to get at least a pick within the top 12, we'd end up being in danger of getting a lower lottery pick instead
still good players to be had in the 14-15 range if we made the playoffs.
and there are a ton of super athletes at the top of round2 or #29. including Diallo who every one creamed their pants over before he went back to kentucky.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
kamaze wrote:It wasn't all Billy King's fault Prokhorov's guys were behind a lot of the moves. The further away from personnel moves the better.
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
MrDollarBills wrote:I agree with everyone the need to improve the athleticism. But unless make a killer deal on draft night I don't really see anyone at the end of this draft that is going to move the needle. but we say that every year, so who knows.
I had a horrible thought today. What if this offseason's work with the players we have now helps big time and the Nets mess around and win 38-40 games next season?
It would be just our luck for the one year where we collectively hope to get at least a pick within the top 12, we'd end up being in danger of getting a lower lottery pick instead
SpeedyG wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:I agree with everyone the need to improve the athleticism. But unless make a killer deal on draft night I don't really see anyone at the end of this draft that is going to move the needle. but we say that every year, so who knows.
I had a horrible thought today. What if this offseason's work with the players we have now helps big time and the Nets mess around and win 38-40 games next season?
It would be just our luck for the one year where we collectively hope to get at least a pick within the top 12, we'd end up being in danger of getting a lower lottery pick instead
I've been saying this for the longest time. This might be a case where our development progresses faster than what is beneficial for us.
vincecarter4pres wrote:Prokorov wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:I agree with everyone the need to improve the athleticism. But unless make a killer deal on draft night I don't really see anyone at the end of this draft that is going to move the needle. but we say that every year, so who knows.
I had a horrible thought today. What if this offseason's work with the players we have now helps big time and the Nets mess around and win 38-40 games next season?
It would be just our luck for the one year where we collectively hope to get at least a pick within the top 12, we'd end up being in danger of getting a lower lottery pick instead :lol: :lol: :lol:
still good players to be had in the 14-15 range if we made the playoffs.
and there are a ton of super athletes at the top of round2 or #29. including Diallo who every one creamed their pants over before he went back to kentucky.
Diallo was definitely over-hyped last year, but now it feels like he's almost being disrespected. Unless there's something behind it, like attitude concerns, or he's straight up dumb as a box of rocks, a wing with his physical attributes, athletic ability, young age and desire to dig in on the defensive end should never last to pick 29, let alone the 2nd round.