We should make a trade

kidd007 · Post #1 » by **kidd007** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:44 am

I think it's time to make a trade, even though this team has played well last games.I was thinking that we need a defensive man, but that can also scores.A guy like Ron Artest would be good for us.What do you guys think about RJ,Boone,Magloire for Artest and Brad Miller.I would not mind trading Carter for Artest and Miller as well, once Carter is not playing that great this season, with no D, just taking shots and missing almost all of them.

Da big3 · Post #2 » by **Da big3** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:48 am

im for artest but this NJ sends Mags, collins, and wright nothing more not the big man we need

bigmoney · Post #3 » by **bigmoney** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:09 am

why the hell do you guys cry for trades after every time we lose

Da big3 · Post #4 » by **Da big3** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:18 am

bigmoney wrote:why the hell do you guys cry for trades after every time we lose

actually this was before the loss :wink:

etopn23 · Post #5 » by **etopn23** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:20 am

Why in the hell would we pick up Ron Artest? We don't need another G/F.

Da big3 · Post #6 » by **Da big3** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:26 am

etopn23 wrote:Why in the hell would we pick up Ron Artest? We don't need another G/F.

he brings more defense to the table

ItsaVC3 · Post #7 » by **ItsaVC3** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 3:26 am

bigmoney wrote:why the hell do you guys cry for trades after every time we lose

cause lets see they have all these pretty good players and where losing to easy teams and r lu is pretty good so i dont know what games have u been watching

NetsForce · Post #8 » by **NetsForce** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:21 pm

Getting Artest would probably require giving up RJ and taking back at least one bad contract from the Kings...

I don't see how that would make this team better offensively but they'd probably be more consistent defensively, oh yeah they'd also be one ticking time bomb waiting to happen =/

RJ 24 · Post #9 » by **RJ 24** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:28 pm

this is a dumb trade. why do we need to obtain defense and give away offense when we are at the bottom of the leauge in PPG. Plus your giving away RJ who is having a career year, Josh Boone is has been very good lately and who could possibly develop to be very good, and an expiring in Magloire. This is dumb.

deviljets7 · Post #10 » by **deviljets7** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:34 pm

RJ 24 wrote:this is a dumb trade. why do we need to obtain defense and give away offense when we are at the bottom of the leauge in PPG. Plus your giving away RJ who is having a career year, Josh Boone is has been very good lately and who could possibly develop to be very good, and an expiring in Magloire. This is dumb.

jeff1624 · Post #11 » by **jeff1624** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:55 pm

Stupid trade...

PS: VC is shooting 45% this season how the hell is that missing ''almost all of them''

deviljets7 · Post #12 » by **deviljets7** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:07 pm

Instead of creating a new thread, I figure I'll use this thread to make two proposals that make significantly more sense IMO:

1. Marcus, Wright, Magliore, Collins and a #1 (lottery protected) to Seattle for Chris Wilcox, Earl Watson and Damien Wilkins

2. in a 3-team trade
NJ Trades: Collins, Magliore and a #1 (lottery protected)
NJ Gets: Drew Gooden and Shareef Abdur-Raheem

CLE Trades: Gooden, Snow, Cedric Simmons, Ira Newble and a #1
CLE Gets: Mike Bibby and Kenny Thomas

SAC Trades: Bibby, SAR and Thomas
SAC Gets: Snow, Simmons, Collins, Magliore, Newble and 2 #1s

jeff1624 · Post #13 » by **jeff1624** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:16 pm

^^that 2nd deal has too many flaws..

Sacto gets back 2 expirings, a guy in his rookie contract and collins who expires in 09 PLUS 2 1st rounders for Mike Bibby and the chance to get 2 rid of useless players??

They're getting rid of a horrible contract in thomas and a guy who has been limited due to injuries the WHOLE season...

The 1st one is ok IMO... We get back a swingman that isnt afraid to take a shot, a big that would shine playing alongside Kidd and watson a servicable back up...

RJ 24 · Post #14 » by **RJ 24** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:58 am

deviljets7 wrote:Instead of creating a new thread, I figure I'll use this thread to make two proposals that make significantly more sense IMO:

1. Marcus, Wright, Magliore, Collins and a #1 (lottery protected) to Seattle for Chris Wilcox, Earl Watson and Damien Wilkins

2. in a 3-team trade
NJ Trades: Collins, Magliore and a #1 (lottery protected)
NJ Gets: Drew Gooden and Shareef Abdur-Raheem

CLE Trades: Gooden, Snow, Cedric Simmons, Ira Newble and a #1
CLE Gets: Mike Bibby and Kenny Thomas

SAC Trades: Bibby, SAR and Thomas
SAC Gets: Snow, Simmons, Collins, Magliore, Newble and 2 #1s

the first trade just plain out sucks and the second trade is alright but i wouldn't do it.

Da big3 · Post #15 » by **Da big3** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:48 am

the lottery looks pretty good Eric Gordon, Beasly, Mayo, Rose ---for a key componet marcus he we replace with a ROY

vincecarter4pres · Post #16 » by **vincecarter4pres** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:48 pm

deviljets7 wrote:Instead of creating a new thread, I figure I'll use this thread to make two proposals that make significantly more sense IMO:

1. Marcus, Wright, Magliore, Collins and a #1 (lottery protected) to Seattle for Chris Wilcox, Earl Watson and Damien Wilkins

2. in a 3-team trade
NJ Trades: Collins, Magliore and a #1 (lottery protected)
NJ Gets: Drew Gooden and Shareef Abdur-Raheem

CLE Trades: Gooden, Snow, Cedric Simmons, Ira Newble and a #1
CLE Gets: Mike Bibby and Kenny Thomas

SAC Trades: Bibby, SAR and Thomas
SAC Gets: Snow, Simmons, Collins, Magliore, Newble and 2 #1s

I like the 1st one a lot.
Watson would be great off the bench to relieve Kidd.
Wilkins would be greta off the bench as a 6xth man.
Wilcox would be a beast plaing with Kidd.

Only problem is it cuts into eitherr Boone or SWAT's minutes along with Boki.