ImageImageImageImageImage

From TNT: Mavs interested with Kidd

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
Hoops23
General Manager
Posts: 8,845
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Location: City of Angels
   

From TNT: Mavs interested with Kidd 

Post#1 » by Hoops23 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:29 am

Before the Heat-Spurs game, David Aldrige said that it
User avatar
RJ 24
Senior
Posts: 510
And1: 10
Joined: May 19, 2007
Location: NJ

Re: From TNT: Mavs interested with Kidd 

Post#2 » by RJ 24 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:46 am

Hoops23 wrote:Before the Heat-Spurs game, David Aldrige said that it
Image
deviljets7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,536
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: From TNT: Mavs interested with Kidd 

Post#3 » by deviljets7 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:00 am

Hoops23 wrote:Before the Heat-Spurs game, David Aldrige said that it
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#4 » by JES12 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:27 am

Dallas is not going to trade Dirk, Harris or Howard for Kidd. Barkley is just anti-mav as evident by picking David West over Josh Howard and Dirk on his all-star votes.
User avatar
The_Child_Prodigy
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: May 03, 2005

 

Post#5 » by The_Child_Prodigy » Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:59 am

Harris has to come back. No not Luscious.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by 4ho5ive » Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:45 am

JES12 wrote:Dallas is not going to trade Dirk, Harris or Howard for Kidd. Barkley is just anti-mav as evident by picking David West over Josh Howard and Dirk on his all-star votes.


I think its a possibility that Harris would be involved. I think Howard/Dirk are obviously off limits. And just because Chuck took David West over Howard/Dirk doesnt mean he is anti-Mavs. Maybe there are other reasons present but David West is having an excellent year once again. Im glad that guy is getting some recognition.

RJ 24's deal seems kinda too much for Kidd when the Lakers werent willing to give up Bynum for the guy.
User avatar
Universe
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,715
And1: 120
Joined: Aug 21, 2005
Location: Ontario

 

Post#7 » by Universe » Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:03 am

Devin Harris is the center peice but unlike Bynum, he will not be the next "Wilt".
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#8 » by JES12 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:12 am

Well, the problem is there is no way we are giving up Harris, thus this trade will never go down if you insist on Harris being included.

2 years ago we would not trade Harris for Artest. This summer, Cuban stated that any deal with KG would leave us with Dirk, Harris, Stack (obvious from recent signing) and KG. The Kobe trade would have happened if they were willing to give up Harris & Howard, but we would not give up Harris.

Now, certainly, Harris is still of limits.

And even if you don't believe the whole Harris thing, Cuban and Avery deny any trade talks for Kidd because he would cost too much (*ahm*...Harris).

http://www.dallasbasketball.com/fullArc ... hp?id=2584

NO KIDD ON THE BLOCK
Mavs Deny Interest In Unhappy Nets PG
By Mike Fisher -- DB.com


The chorus of Mavs
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

 

Post#9 » by 4ho5ive » Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:17 am

Well, that makes most of my last post worthless.
User avatar
SaintofKillers
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,001
And1: 506
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
 

 

Post#10 » by SaintofKillers » Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:55 am

Devin Harris + KVH's contract for Kidd.
Image
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#11 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 10:10 am

SaintofKillers wrote:Devin Harris + KVH's contract for Kidd.


A team keeps rights to a player for only one year after the player's last pro contract. KVN last contract expired June 30, 2006

Thus, Dallas' right to sign-and-trade KVH ended June 30, 2007

For some reason many of their fans still think they can sign & trade him. That's not true.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

 

Post#12 » by jeff1624 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:24 am

^^damnit, I find no suitable trade between the mavs and the nets then..
Dat Leadership
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#13 » by JES12 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:14 pm

bulls6 wrote:A team keeps rights to a player for only one year after the player's last pro contract. KVN last contract expired June 30, 2006

Thus, Dallas' right to sign-and-trade KVH ended June 30, 2007

For some reason many of their fans still think they can sign & trade him. That's not true.


Wrong.

The June 30th rule is if we renounce him, we cannot resign him with Bird rights until the following June 30th. If that team wants to sign the player after renouncing and within a year, they have to use an exception or with cap space if they are under the cap.

We still have his rights until he officially retires, signs elsewhere or we renounce him.


But that's not the point anyways. At this point, Cuban was too stingy to spend our MLE on a swingman (Pietrus, Posey, Pavlovic, MoPeterson, etc) that we desperatly needed. I seriously doubt he uses KVH for the right to spend 20 mil per year on an over 30 player doubled by tax. And I also seriously doubt he trades 11 years of Harris for 2 of Kidd (years til they are 36) when PG is not even our issue (our issue is as swingman to put next to Howard).
User avatar
netsfanbq
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,449
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 04, 2005
Location: Kansas

 

Post#14 » by netsfanbq » Fri Jan 25, 2008 4:03 pm

I do think it's time for a change in the mix...having said that, I'd rather trade Carter or RJ (mainly VC). But if Kidd goes to Dallas, Devin Harris has to come back. Otherwise, no go. We're not winning a title without Kidd anyway, so no reason to trade him Terry/Stack "depth". No, get a young guy and a pick. And I like Harris.
Walk away from this ASAP.
User avatar
jerseyjac
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,956
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 01, 2001

 

Post#15 » by jerseyjac » Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:07 pm

absolutely disgusting...
FGump
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,050
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 14, 2004

 

Post#16 » by FGump » Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:49 pm

bulls6 wrote:-
A team keeps rights to a player for only one year after the player's last pro contract. KVN last contract expired June 30, 2006

WRONG!!!!

Thus, Dallas' right to sign-and-trade KVH ended June 30, 2007

WRONG

For some reason many of their fans still think they can sign & trade him. That's not true.

WRONG!!!


You would think that you, as a moderator, wouldn't go from forum to forum making up rules that don't exist or spewing CBA info that isn't in the CBA.

But you continue to do so. Seems I wander into one of these every week or two from you. Good grief, do your damn homework sometime before cranking out your hso's, okay?

The Mavs had, and continue to have, the ability to SNT KVH. There is nothing in the rules that forbids it, and there are even rules that speak to that very situation happening, so it's obviously something that CAN happen. And the reason that many of the fans believe this is because it's true.

Now the question is, WILL it happen? I doubt it. But if the Mavs and KVH and some other team want to use him for trade filler, they have every ability to do so.
FGump
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,050
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 14, 2004

 

Post#17 » by FGump » Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:58 pm

In my opinion as a close observer of both teams, the ONLY trade that makes any sense whatsoever in getting Kidd to Dallas would be the Kidd for Devin Harris (plus KVH filler) idea.

That allows the Nets to quickly reduce from a $20M a year guy to an $8M per year guy, who is capable of running the team and with lots of talent. And it gives Dallas an upgrade for the short run, the classic old-for-young trade.

But I don't think Dallas would do it like that, and I can't see any other trade of Kidd to Dallas where both teams would get something they want. One one level it makes sense, but I think the Mavs are more likely to roll the dice with essentially the team they have and take their chances.
User avatar
Bucky O'Hare
Banned User
Posts: 1,000
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!

 

Post#18 » by Bucky O'Hare » Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:55 am

I can't believe the Mavs wouldn't trade Harris for Kidd. Harris is good, but he's shown nothing to make anyone think he'll ever be special. After last years flame out, I can't help but feel the Mavs are pretenders disguised as contenders. IF they could pick up an All-Star point guard, a leader like Jason Kidd, without moving Dirk or Howard, they'd be idiots to pass.

PRETENDERS: Devin Harris - Jason Terry - Josh Howard - Dirk Nowitzki - Erick Dampier

CONTENDERS: Jason Kidd - Jason Terry - Josh Howard - Dirk Nowtizki - Erick Dampier
User avatar
treiz
RealGM
Posts: 11,984
And1: 564
Joined: Aug 17, 2005
Location: London, England
       

 

Post#19 » by treiz » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:48 pm

To be honest, if we're gonna rebuild the Harris + KVH trade would be the first step to do it. And to be honest, I'd do it. I feel sorry for Kidd, he needs a ring already.
User avatar
JES12
RealGM
Posts: 24,863
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#20 » by JES12 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:31 pm

Bucky O'Hare wrote:I can't believe the Mavs wouldn't trade Harris for Kidd. Harris is good, but he's shown nothing to make anyone think he'll ever be special. After last years flame out, I can't help but feel the Mavs are pretenders disguised as contenders. IF they could pick up an All-Star point guard, a leader like Jason Kidd, without moving Dirk or Howard, they'd be idiots to pass.

PRETENDERS: Devin Harris - Jason Terry - Josh Howard - Dirk Nowitzki - Erick Dampier

CONTENDERS: Jason Kidd - Jason Terry - Josh Howard - Dirk Nowtizki - Erick Dampier
Are you KIDDing me? If you believe Harris has shown nothing, then you must not be watching any mav games. He is our best penetrator, 2nd best defender (behind Howard) and his +/- is twice as much as Kidd. Harris does more for our team than Kidd does for New Jersey. Why don't you take your goggles off and watch some of the games.

Just last night, there was a poll on who was our fist half MVP

37% was Harris
33% was Howard
30% was Dirk

And I would have to agree with that.

Edit: and the biggest knockon Harris was his shot which has been knocked out of the conversation this year. His 3pt % has been better than Dirk and 11 of the Mavs and his FG% is only beat by our 3 centers (Damp, Diop & Fazekas) who are shooting 51 to 63%.

Return to Brooklyn Nets