The Nets, Way Too Much Talent to Lose Right?
Posted: Sat Feb 9, 2008 10:13 pm
This is going to sound really really stupid and no I am not trollling, but how the heck are the Nets losing in the East with this much talent?
Let's compare with the Celtics:
PG- Kidd vs. PG- Rondo
Don't get me wrong, Rondo is solid but comon.
SG- Carter vs. SG- Allen
Most would say Allen is a cerebral player that atleast tries on defense but I'd say Carter at his best is harder to guard because of his variety of moves.
SF- Jefferson vs. Pierce
A win for the Celtics, but not by a huge huge margin.
I realize the Celtics have Garnett, but even then the Celtics are winning at a decent clip without him and Sean Williams isn't bad.
Can any Nets fans explain to me what's going on?
Let's compare with the Celtics:
PG- Kidd vs. PG- Rondo
Don't get me wrong, Rondo is solid but comon.
SG- Carter vs. SG- Allen
Most would say Allen is a cerebral player that atleast tries on defense but I'd say Carter at his best is harder to guard because of his variety of moves.
SF- Jefferson vs. Pierce
A win for the Celtics, but not by a huge huge margin.
I realize the Celtics have Garnett, but even then the Celtics are winning at a decent clip without him and Sean Williams isn't bad.
Can any Nets fans explain to me what's going on?