Page 1 of 1
Question: Mavs Deal or Last years LA Deal?
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:38 am
by Chubby Chaser
Do you guys think this current offer from the Mavs with, Diop, KVH, Hassell Harris, Ager, cash n picks, is better than the Kwame, Farmar, Cash and a 1st that was on the table last year before the deadline?
(Excluding Bynum in the trade of course)
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:37 am
by Jemini80
i'm not a Nets fan, so from an impartial view
Diop>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kwame
Hassell has 1 year left
Harris>>>>>>>>>>farmar
2 first rounders>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>1 first rounder
plus Dallas will probably be a lower seed than LA so those draft picks will be better too.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:03 am
by Adam1221
Dallas deal=10 times better.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:57 pm
by S.I.C. GM
If you put Bynum in that it would be closer, but we have 2 young PF/C. So PG for PG would work better.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:00 pm
by mack69
The Dallas deal has more workable parts. This is a better deal!
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:35 pm
by NjNeTs1029
the dallas deal is much better.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:07 pm
by SpeedyG
Dallas deal.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:14 pm
by MrDollarBills
Seeing that LA never would have come up off of Bynum, the Dallas deal is far superior. I am astounded Rod was even able to work this deal, we got far more than i expected for Kidd.
IN ROD WE TRUST!!
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:24 pm
by Da big3
Harris future 20ppg 6apg, better than farmer, plus quicker and 2 first round picks, who knows JKidd might retire in the next 3 years or lose his effectiveness while Harris is beasting
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:27 pm
by NjNeTs1029
Da big3 wrote:Harris future 20ppg 6apg, better than farmer, plus quicker and 2 first round picks, who knows JKidd might retire in the next 3 years or lose his effectiveness while Harris is beasting
people have been saying that for like 3 years now but he keeps proving everyone wrong. I really wouldnt be surprised if he takes dallas to the Conference Finals or even the Finals. He wants his ring.
but im still glad we got Harris
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:32 pm
by NYC2AUS
Wasn
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:35 pm
by RJ 24
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:40 pm
by treiz
Dallas.
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:43 pm
by NYC2AUS
"Do you guys think this current offer from the Mavs with, Diop, KVH, Hassell Harris, Ager, cash n picks, is better than the Kwame, Farmar, Cash and a 1st that was on the table last year before the deadline? "
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:20 am
by 8/24
S.I.C. GM wrote:If you put Bynum in that it would be closer, but we have 2 young PF/C. So PG for PG would work better.
What are you saying.....if LA put Bynum in that deal, he alone would be >>>>>>>> than the Dallas deal.
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:47 am
by vincecarter4pres
8/24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
What are you saying.....if LA put Bynum in that deal, he alone would be >>>>>>>> than the Dallas deal.
I don't know if you are being sarcastic, but without question, if we would have gotten Bynum, plus the rest of the LA deal it would have been far superior.
Like someone else said, also , Gasol was had for KWame, a decent 6xt man looking pg and 2 1sts.
We probrably miss the playoffs last year an go lotto
Draft a PG or trade the pick for someone like ANdre Miller
Imagine if we had a lineup such as:
PG: Miller
SG VC
SF RJ
PF Gasol
C Bynum
Bench of Boone, Boki, SWAT and Curly
Easy contender in 1 to 3 years.
Even trade VC straight up for Tmac or RJ for Kirlenko when these guys were also available in the offseason for straight up value.
I like the deal we got for Kidd, but.................
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:48 pm
by netsforever
I don't think we'd be able to make the Memphis deal if we made the LA deal.
Just seems like Gasol would be reluctant to come here with that team - and doesn't he have a veto over the trade?
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:55 pm
by Jordan45822
Gasol doesn't have a no-trade clause.
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:06 pm
by Pugsley_2491
only player with a full no trade clause is kobe...