David Lee for picks 10+21
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:26 pm
Very fair deal.
RealGM
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
David Lee for picks 10+21
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=780918
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:41 pm
Lee is probably the only Knick that Walsh wants next season....
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:41 pm
^ Did he say fair deal.
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:43 pm
I think your sig says it all.
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:44 pm
o_o... So the Nets get a glorified Josh Boone who plays worse defense AND get to add to their already crowded front line...
Although I like David Lee's energy he's not going to take the Nets to the next level.
Although I like David Lee's energy he's not going to take the Nets to the next level.
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:31 pm
fair deal? I hope you're joking...we could most likely get 2 rotational players with 10 and 21. Who am I kidding, we have Frank as a coach.
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:34 pm
i would do a Lee for #21 pick
: )
: )
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:59 am
Lee for #10 is probably fair.
But Nets fans seem to think they're friggin headed to the playoffs, so fugheddaboutit.
But Nets fans seem to think they're friggin headed to the playoffs, so fugheddaboutit.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:20 am
Please leave the David Lee worshiping in the Knicks board.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:08 pm
#1KnicksFan wrote:Lee for #10 is probably fair.
But Nets fans seem to think they're friggin headed to the playoffs, so fugheddaboutit.
yeh who said that?
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:04 pm
#1KnicksFan wrote:Lee for #10 is probably fair.
But Nets fans seem to think they're friggin headed to the playoffs, so fugheddaboutit.
Yeah coz the Nets just had their WORST season in 6 years and were STILL better than the Knicks.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:06 pm
#1KnicksFan wrote:Lee for #10 is probably fair.
But Nets fans seem to think they're friggin headed to the playoffs, so fugheddaboutit.
wow, a 30th overall in 2005 draft is worth a top 10 in this stacked class....umm?
Lee worth our #21 pick is a stretch. I'd probably do THAT if we weren't overloaded with bigs, as it is.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:46 pm
I'll PROBABLY do an Ager+2nd rounder, probably.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:04 pm
We already have Josh Boone. If David Lee was a back to the basket scorer, then we'd have to take a look, other wise, i don't see the point of even considering this.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:10 pm
yeh as G said...for the record, I'd do #21 for Lee...
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:12 pm
SpeedyG wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Yeah coz the Nets just had their WORST season in 6 years and were STILL better than the Knicks.
you got that right bro...
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:34 pm
SAY NO TO DRUGS!! 
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:44 pm
Phewww!! is it hot in here or What?
Briggs you are seriously a couple of cent's short of a dollar if you think it this is a fair deal.
In the words of the great man Homer J Simpson. 'You chose fruit you stick with fruit'
Briggs you are seriously a couple of cent's short of a dollar if you think it this is a fair deal.
In the words of the great man Homer J Simpson. 'You chose fruit you stick with fruit'
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:02 pm
I like lee's game, a lot, but we have Boone. Josh Boone brings much of the same type of production that Lee does. Compared to Lee, Boone needs to toughen up and work on his FTs.
There's no point in having both of them on one team.
There's no point in having both of them on one team.
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:23 am
LOL for number 10 and 21....Lee is so overrated by some of you..He is a good player, but he isn't worth 10 and 21...