MrDollarBills wrote:If the roster at the start of next season is in better shape than it is now and the Nets still get off to their same atrocious start that has become common place under Lawrence Frank's watch, I for one think that a change will be made, albeit two seasons too late. It's not about Thorn giving indications that he didn't like him, Thorn didn't give any indication that he didn't like Byron before he canned him to appease Jason Kidd.
It's a star's league. When a choice is to be made between your star and your coach, the owner and general manager will appeal more to the star. Simple business. In Scott's case, it was Scott or the team. In Frank's case, it's Frank alone because no one else in the organization is against him. Frank's expectations won't be high for him next season with the way we played this season. Not to mention he just signed an extension. We can't just cut him loose like the Knicks have done with Brown and Isiah. We're not that ballin'.
And what does Thorn having years to "satisfy" his captain have to do with THIS SUMMER? What Thorn did over the past years to appease some guy that quit on this team just so he can go over to the Mavs to get schooled by a kid half his age in a playoff series has nothing to do with whats going on right now...you need to let him go dude, seriously.
Love the irony here. Kidd break your heart? Once again after months of this, you've learned nothing on accusations without proof. To top it off, you tell me to do something you can't do. Not to mention you posted in a congratulatory thread to Kidd to stick it to him. I'll simply dismiss this one again.
Anyway, my point with Kidd is that he's a franchise player. All he needed was a couple of more pieces for a good run. We trade our biggest star, are others become older, and guess what...we're farther away from the goal. Do you think it'll be easier for Thorn and Kiki to build around borderline All-Stars?
That's your assumption about the drafts looking weak for the next two three years, do you mind backing that up with some type of fact? You don't know what will happen in college basketball or abroad and what players will be available to the Nets when that time comes.
I'm actually an avid college sports fan...okay just an avid college basketball and football fan. I travel...a lot. Reading and watching local, national, and international sports sections on the road are one of the few things that keep me sane. You could go to multiple draft sites and they'll tell you the same: they don't look too well. For starters, take a look at our candidates in nbadraft.net's 2009. If you say things are looking up and we'll pick in the second third of the draft, you'll be looking at saviors in Tyler Hansborough, Jordan Hill, or Patrick Patterson. Oh joy...what I'm saying is that drafting isn't going to be enough for this team to see surface again. Packaging them will be even harder than Thorn's ever tried. Can you really not see that?
What FA's are we signing long term? Thorn may let Krstic -and- Diop walk if the offers are too ridiculous. I don't see thorn getting into any bidding wars over Boki Nachbar...and we have no expiring contracts on deck? What???? What well of information are you pulling this from man?
And let's say we don't sign anyone. That's nine players excluding our available three draft picks and including Swift picks up his option (he's not going to get +$6 million anywhere else). And excluding those draft picks, brings us within 5 million of the cap. Our roster would be...
Boone
Williams/Swift
RJ/Hassell
VC/Ager
Harris/Williams
Here's a small list of FAs. Who could we sign for the $5 million?
Big Names: Baron Davis (Player's Option), Maggette (PO), Brand (PO), Marion (PO), Artest (PO), Jamison, Arenas (PO)
Restricted from Rookie-Expiring Contracts: Josh Smith, Josh Childress, Okafor, Gordon, Deng, Ariza
Other FAs: Pietrus, Barnes, Ellis, Gibson
Keep in mind signing just one of the last four will cost us that $5 million, meaning we have no chance at the other two categories.
You're right, and your point is? That falls in the same boat as me not worrying about Ratner penny pinching, if he does, the only thing i can do is get upset about it, which at the end of the day is futile. The only thing i can do is not spend a dime on the product, like a lot of people will do if there is a conscious effort on the part of the front office to not make this team competitive/a contender.
The main reasons why anyone posts on their board is to vent and express their opinion. On this board we take players, management, situations into account on our posting. Why not ownership? You could continue to talk about Thorn, Kiki, and the direction of the team, but Ratner as a majority owner does have a part on this team. You might want to take him into account when you post about the team's status, future moves, etc.
There's a difference between hard times(rebuilding) and a team's ownership doing whatever it can to cut costs and purposefully put a garbage product on the floor,
Isn't the point of rebuilding to cost cut on purpose to get under the cap to sign upcoming big names and high draft picks? Hey, you might not even have to worry about that. Ratner's got a middle of the pack team treading the salary cap. The combination of VC, RJ, and Harris will keep the team in the second third of the league. The possibility to cost cut to rebuild for a quicker start in Brooklyn has a high chance of taking place though. Hey, the entire reason for bringing Kiki in might be to cost cut like he did in Denver. Either way, rebuilding, cost cutting, whatever you want to call it gets higher draft picks so we might select someone decent in the upcoming weak drafts while at the same time, getting money to sign upcoming FAs...something we can't exactly do right now in our situation, yet you still seem very optimistic.
for you to even insinuate that i'm some type of bandwagoner for speaking my mind about that issue is a load of crap Rich, this may have been the second time since i've been posting here where i've seen you come at me from that angle and i think it's pretty pathetic, if you want to call someone a bandwagoner you might want to look in the mirror, because you sure seemed ready to jump ship when Kidd got traded, going by your point of view one would think the NJ Nets franchise started playing basketball in 2001.
No need to get so defensive. You simply mentioned whether you would spend your money on a team in hard times.
As for my opinions, mine have just been realisitic scenarios going by what has happened in this team's entire history. Sure, I admit I get negative, but what one part have I said isn't realisitic? You're talking about how things are looking up and how well we'll do in the upcoming season. I admire the optimism. I surely do, but there comes a line between optimism and fanaticism and it looks like you're looking at just that. From your words that the Nets are turning a corner after being further away from a Finals appearance in the last seven years, I have no idea where you get your inspiration from. I seriously would love to know because based on basketball organization track records, we're headed for mediocrity once again.
I have been a Nets fan since 1991 and have gone thru years of losing, and I have no problem going through a rebuilding effort(or retooling) to get this team back where it needs to be, but if I see Ratner and co cutting costs and not giving a damn about what they put out there on the floor, I have no problem not devoting my time, money, and attention to the product until i see things change, i may be a loyal fan but i'm not some fool that will tolerate garbage like that, that doesn't mean i will be running off rooting for another team or ex players on other teams either.
Once again, not questioning your loyalty, you simply brought it up, next...
That has not happened yet, because from what i've been seeing, the front office has been trying to get things right and the trading of Jason Kidd for picks and a top 10-11 PG in Devin Harris was a solid move, so i see no reason to accuse them of selling the fans out. But i'm sure you would have much rather had this team handicapped with Kidd's contract and his pissy passive aggressive attitude?
Go to my post history and find if I had ever stated trading Kidd for Harris was a bad move. Can't find it? Of course you can't. I've never said that. If I'm angered at the Nets FO, it's more for NOT doing what they should've. Abdur-Rahim (Can't say he would've had the same problems here), not firing Frank, not finding a big man, not trying harder in trade discussions (Thorn never shows his hand (emotions), we all know, but he couldn't even make it look like he hard for KG, Gasol).
Kidd's contract was for +$20 million next season. Couldn't care less if he literally took a piss on the Nets FO. He could've sat next season for all I cared since he was an expiring. He would've only hurt himself. If he left, we would've freed up more cap space and enticed other FAs with more money. We traded him for a good young PG and two picks. I'm fine with either scenario. But in either case we're further from where we were when he was here. Unlike you though, I know the fans are going to feel worse than they are now before it starts to get better. I just don't understand how we're closer to a championship. I mean, does resenting Kidd resolve our problems? Cause if it does, I will resent the ish out of him. Until them, forgive me if I'm not to Kidd what Toronto was to VC.