RealGM

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:19 pm**

Sorry to intrude, but I am a Clippers fan, and I noticed you guys really want Elton Brand.

Brand/Mobley for RJ/Harris/Rights to DeAndre Jordan (#10)/Hassell

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:23 pm**

do you want us to bend over and spell RUN too?

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:32 pm**

It doesn't make any sense to trade for Brand if you don't have any kind of a team to be successful with him. With trading away RJ , Harris and the Pick it won't be a good team.

They don't even have a starting caliber PG anymore .

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:51 pm**

RJ could be replaced in the deal. The Clippers really have no need for him with Al Thornton at the 3. I just really want Devin Harris and would like DeAndre Jordan.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:53 pm**

^ Maybe replace him with Stromile and KVH (S&T).

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:15 pm**

Brand and Mobley for Harris and V Carter?

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:27 pm**

Thats doesn't make any sense either . Why do you trade for Brand if you don't make your team any better ? If you trade Harris and Vince for Brand you will not be any better next year and thats the goal if you trade for Brand since he's not really a youngster anymore.

If RJ stays and Harris goes hmm maybe but i really don't think Harris will be traded anyway.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:27 pm**

RJ/Swift/Hassell/KVH/Marcus for Brand/Maggette

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:38 pm**

G_MoNeY wrote:RJ/Swift/Hassell/KVH/Marcus for Brand/Maggette

I would do that deal for Brand and Mobley.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:40 pm**

SportsFan215 wrote:RJ could be replaced in the deal. The Clippers really have no need for him with Al Thornton at the 3. I just really want Devin Harris and would like DeAndre Jordan.

I would think about that.
Our own big 3.

Garnet>Brand
Pierce>RJ
VC>>Allen

or look at it this way

Garnett>Brand
Pierce=VC
Allen=RJ(they both have different skill sets they excel in)

Still needs help from other positions, but yet a truly competitive contending basis.

I know he is a huge risk, but throw in Livinston for Marcus or Sean Williams and it is a done deal.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:44 pm**

Plus we would have Mobley as that big minute 6xth man we have been looking for when we had competitive lineups.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:22 pm**

i like the magette and brand one magette could replace rj

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:08 pm**

RJ/Swift/Hassell/KVH/Marcus for Brand/Mobley...please don't take offense, but that initital deal was horrible dude :laugh:

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:11 pm**

my trade actually works if you add in Mobley too....it'd be a bit of a stretch for LAC. We'd have to throw in a two 2nd rounders or something.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:59 pm**

The Clippers wouldn't want Marcus. The whole reason for this deal is to get Devin Harris.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:00 pm**

Brand/Tim Thomas for Harris/KVH (S&T)/Nachbar (S&T)/Rights to DeAndre Jordan (#10)

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:11 pm**

Btw there's no need for a KVH sign and trade he's on a 3 year contract with 2 of the years beeing team options . And i still doubt Harris will get traded even though it looks acceptable .

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:18 pm**

Oh i didn't know about the KVH thing. How much are his team options for?

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:17 pm**

Well i don't know but i guess around his 4.3 million he's on right now.

Posted: **Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:51 pm**

we're not dealing Harris. Marcus is on the block with RJ and Swift. The core package in any deal, such as this, has to involve at least 2 of them.

RealGM

Trade Proposal LAC/NJN

Trade Proposal LAC/NJN

Re: Trade Proposal LAC/NJN