S.I.C. GM wrote:deviljets7 wrote:Serpo wrote:Two Max-contract are pretty unrealistic . Countless teams clear capspace for 2010 / are going to have capspace in 2010 . Getting one will be hard but two ? Talk about mission impossible.
If anything I think once you get one, the second wouldn't be that hard.
Let's put it this way. One of the biggest arguments for keeping Carter is that you have to have other players to make the place attractive to LeBron or another free agent. By having that room for the second free agent, the opportunity is there to give LeBron a much better "Robin" than we would have otherwise. Think of all the guys who can be free agents in the summer of 2010, how many would LeBron likely want to play with over what will be a 33-year-old Vince Carter?
The key is getting that first free agent.
I agree Devil. Yeah alot of teams will have cap space for FA agents in 2010, but to have enough for 2 big FA we have to distinguish ourselves.
If you look at our roster Thorn and Kiki have picked the right pieces. First, Thorn and Kiki have gotten an above average PG which Lebron has complained about not having. Second, Thorn and Kiki have front loaded PF/C. Lebron has made it to the finals with guys like Variejo and Z. Lopez has been compared with Z. When it comes to the energy for the guy that needs a haircut you can pick between S.Will and/or IMO Anderson will fit. Third, Lebron needs capable shooters around him so when he gets doubled and can pass it too. Most of the players are the roster are capable of that, big or small. CDR is going to be the X factor. Though IMO he wont be the "Robin", with hard work, he can be the perfect 6th man.
Now that leaves "Robin". This person maybe available through FA in 2010, draft (if we get a high enough pick) and trades or S&T can also be possible. No the question is WHO can be the perfect Robin? Though I am not comparing Lebron to Jordan, but MJ's robin was Pippen. Pippen was an all around player. this guy has to be able to if needed to step up and take over a game offensively and he also has when needed to shut a player down.
That is my take. If lebron decides to stay in Cleveland or signs somewhere else, we just need a different game plan.
I think it's pretty clear that cap space alone is not enough to bring LeBron to the Nets. Too many teams are likely to have cap room (including the Cavs) so this is a completely different situation than this year with Brand/Baron Davis or last year with Rashard Lewis. So you have to have some sort of core in place to recruit LeBron (or any other big free agent).
I don't know if the cap room is there for 2 max free agents, even if Carter was gone. To sign 2 max free agents, you'd basically need $38-40 million in cap space to pull it off, something that I'm not sure is possible even if you dump Carter (remember you still have 3 1st rounders to sign and you have to deal with Boone and/or Krstic between now and 2010).
Basically there are four separate ways the Nets can go over the next 2 years in order to "build a core" around LeBron. For the sake of this scenario, I'm making the following assumptions:
1. The cap in 2010/11 is at $65 million
2. All three picks 09 and 10 first rounders are still here (cost $6 million)
3. Harris, Sean Williams, Yi, Brook Lopez, Ryan Andersen and Boone (RFA with a $6.17 mil cap hold) are here, while everyone else (most notably Krstic, Marcus and CDR) are gone.
4. The first year salary on a max contract (ie: LeBron is $18.3 million)
1. Play the course and do nothingWith this scenario, you're about $2.3 million short of a max contract. This can easily be fixed through a myriad of ways. If Lopez/Yi/Sean hit their potential and/or you strike gold in the lottery, you have an enticing group to recruit LeBron. If that doesn't happen, is Devin Harris and a 33-year-old Carter enough to entice him? Carter would be an expiring that could be used in a trade, but expirings only have so much value on their own.
One important note on this one, even if you let Vince expire, you would not likely have cap room in 2011/12 because at that point Sean Williams and Yi would both be RFAs with large cap holds. Those cap holds would eat up most if not all of the savings on Vince's contract, so unless you're dumping Sean and Yi, you can't add LeBron in 2010 and then another marquee FA in 2011.
2. Deal Vince in a non-salary dumpAn example of this would be the Carter/Krstic to Chicago for Gordon/Hughes proposal that was posted on this board a few days ago. In this situation, you have turned Carter into a younger, cheaper and hopefully better "2nd option" in 2010/11. You have enough cap room to potentially add LeBron plus another player (around MLE level, maybe a little above the MLE). If you can get a Ben Gordon caliber player, I think this is a better option than option 1, but is it possible to get a Gordon, Barbosa, or Josh Howard caliber player in a Carter trade? Carter is over 30 and it's not like we're the only team looking for cap room.
3. Deal Vince in a salary dumpAn example of this would be Carter to Cleveland for Sczerbiak and their 2009 1st round pick. Unlike the other two scenarios, you do not have a viable second "Robin" to join LeBron and Harris. With Carter out of the picture, you have a better chance of winning the lottery in 2009 or 2010, but as we know, losing 60 games does not guarantee a top 2 pick. The big thing this deal has in it's favor is that you have opened up about $32 million in cap space. Unless someone is willing to sacrifice money, it's not quite enough to land 2 max FAs (so you can probably forget about Wade, Bosh, Yao or Amare), but just about everyone else is in play (Joe Johnson, a 31-year-old TMac, Ginobli, etc.). If you were to dump Boone, you could have the room for 2 max FAs.
4. Salary Dump Vince and add a player or 2 elsewhereThis is basically a spinoff of options 2 and 3. Carter is dealt in a salary dump and you use your non-2010 pieces (the expirings of Swift/KVH, Marcus Williams and Krstic) or the MLE for a complementary piece or two. Examples of this are the Nocioni rumors or a Childress/JR Smith type. The result would be similar to option 2, where you have cap room for LeBron and possibly a MLE type.